OK, Arjay, so there are versions of thermite without the additive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermite

The fact remains that the most commonly available military-use version would leave the barium nitrate residue.

Bu you need to accept that the presence of thermite is theoretical, not factual.

http://www.de-fact-o.com/fact_read.php?id=8

Just because you can imagine something, Arjay, doesn't mean it suddenly becomes a fact. You need to include a plausibility factor.

Your process is to pile one possibility (thermite was present) onto another (that it was used to destroy the building) onto another (that George Bush helped shift hundreds of tons of the stuff into the building) onto another (that the explosions were coordinated with the acts of terrorism that flew planes into the WTC) to suit your conspiracy agenda.

If I was found slumped over my keyboard in my upstairs study with a knife between my shoulder blades in the middle of writing this to you, and it was determined that a) you had knives in your kitchen drawer, b) you have previously used them to cut meat and c) you have been seen in the past climbing stairs, would it be realistic to accuse you of my murder?

Because that's the territory we're in here, you know.

As for the audit, I'll just repeat what I said earlier.

>>I'm truly glad of course that Arjay sees this possible Fed audit as a victory. I hope he won't be upset when the actual outcome - should there be one - does not meet his expectations.<<

Have a great day.