The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Power with Pride going Belly-up?

Power with Pride going Belly-up?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. All
QUOTE<<In Flanders fields,
where the poppies grow.
the elcia-rda reaps the harvest
soldin the slums
fillin up jails
while beating [bleating] from their gums

In that other field,
where King John did yield
In Britain, yes, that Britain of old
where beneath the gaze of the Barons bold
on parchment that Great Charter was writ;

that of common propriatry
jury by peers
moneies of coin
the only legal tender
the constitution[of these vairious states]...has fortold

the weeds now grow, and cover it.
legislated contractual civil oppression
via statute and act
subverting act into contract

the sheeple fail to react
thus under the constitutions of the state
[of these commonwealths..of sovereign estates held/under trust

In Flanders fields,and many other fields and deserts
in water or trench
our fighting has not brought peace

pieces, though long out of the fight
The million dead lie awaken all through this darkest of night.

The torch of truth harmony and love
lie dimming upon/or on the ground,
nearly rubbed away..not quite rub-bed/out,

sure..they are dimmed
covered with weeds
The faith now broken,
seeking drug induced solace
of Runnymede....made into jin.

[AB-origonal]...sic

For Britain's origonie/states
now unioned.. now a modern state..state
pretending demon-mocracy
statuted Law and terrost debilitating
that left of our liberties?

What are they mate?
Where heritage now just counts for nought,

and trial and hearings routinely abort.

Where just because of a terrorist fright
for the asking .que warrento...by what right
they'll readily extradite.

look up entente
the time is for talking and listening
not anyones words to abort
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 8 October 2009 2:24:39 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It had been a bit of a rum rebellion, what with some of the backbenchers backbiting their guv'nor, Malcolm Turnbull, like what they had. Perhaps it just went with the middle name, Bligh. Or the territory. Everyone soon knew about this because, like on Channel 9 where there was these days increasingly getting to be less real news, Joe had told them, Joe'd told them so. As a consequence, Mr Christian was now going to be able to have the running of the good ship 'Bounty' all to himself, at least for a while.

There had been a sea change.

Forrest realized that he had sort of dropped Julia right in it by having implicitly foreseen a time when Kevin might no longer be on the scene, but there had been nothing intendedly pointed in this omission. Forrest was pointing the bone in a different direction, and it was clearly having its effect already. Forrest nevertheless wished there was an omissions trading scheme in existence: for all its evident effectiveness, bone-pointing didn't pay very much, only a bob or two.

But hey, sufficient unto the day had been the evil thereof. Such mild embarrassment would surely pass unnoticed against the background of the fortuitous events of recent days, and Julia could perhaps do a bit of networking, with the advantage of her recent literary epiphany, around Westminster with members of the UK Labour government. Who knows but that she could not be helpful in crafting a face-saving exit for them from the embarrasment of the Howes' extradition matter? There was always the telephone. After all, it had been HER epiphany: Kevin could have one any time he wanted; OLO is always ready and waiting.

Remember, post hoc ergo propter hoc!

Forrest didn't want to labour the point too much, but thought there was a simple message in all this for an Opposition and its associated political party structure groomed for decades in all manner of subtle ways, to the point that sight had been lost of the nation's heritage: Constitutional monarchy good; republic,BAD!
Posted by Forrest Gumpp, Friday, 9 October 2009 7:55:07 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
i can tell your in shock...[third person referancing]..but julia is as hamstrung as the rest of us...she would know the law is a law that en-force-es itself...upon who ever they chose as today meat

it has the guns/prisons/judges/lawyer/barristers...who can become polititions[and do to the extent of lawyers in govt is near 50 percent

lawyers know their standing only at the cwhim and will of the court...not called a system...for light nor transient cause...but to wholsale oppress or favour who so ever it chose

julies selection of title set this entrain...had she not revealed her..lol..indignation...at succeeeding so wonderfully beyond her station...lol..one should have realised her indignation..at being forced to do many things againsts her nature

it could should have been its own topic...all this unclear expresion dosnt raise the issues...nor advance the insanity of policing drugs..or in this case seemingly precursors...where policing policy via armed cops subverts the duties of the healers curing pain...all drug use is pain

see were all..doing things as best we can..

but none of us is doing perfect..because this is the realm of imperfection...were ALL being tested...to whom much is given...is only the measure of..how many tests..[serving mammon...we have served..anyhow ball is yet again in your court...aim between the lines and the net

how should julia have responded...?
say graham..got a high up/complaint..how should he react?

for that matter..predict the reply..you would have sought/hoped/anticipated.. from the olo posters...

its gotta be better than third personing...im faily sure the deletion isnt as much the issue..as reason de tare...

[ooops..mind block]...sets in
Posted by one under god, Friday, 9 October 2009 8:23:38 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
darn all this research...lol

Post hoc ergo propter hoc - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaPost hoc ergo propter hoc, Latin for "after this, therefore because (on account) of this", is a logical fallacy (of the questionable cause variety) which ...

raison d'ętre
(French)..reason for existence.

reason - definition of reason by the Free Online Dictionary ...Definition of reason in the Online Dictionary. Meaning of reason. Pronunciation of reason. ... the reason for/why &#8594; la causa de/la razón por la cual;..

other issues..quote<<..backbenchers backbiting belicose buffoonary belittling beligerantly betwen their master/..their guv'nor,Malcolm Turn...bull,like what they had.>>.in unity lies perpetual opposition..you cant walk both sides of a brabed wire fence[global warning is a new tax..and tax payer subsidy..for big business..we simply got no opposition..stand against this mal..

lets try to have refendums..where clearly the full import and cost of this new subdsidy/in tax form..to big business gets its full informing,..yay or nay..give choice..theres a new concept

<<Channel 9 where there was these days increasingly getting to be less real news...lol...your not joking...night before last the primetime/news..[lol]..was norman not talking about mrs norman...now not saying something..is deemed news worthy..

its totally not news worthy...and is sports besides..

yet it chew up prime news time...keep all sport in sport...news only real news...dont even mention sport...news..[real news dosnt get the time sport does...

another issue for julia...john gave murdoch..whatever he wanted[high def...that wont squeeze down the internet tubes..getting ever more censoredlol..meaning his owing the free air/..and cable..franchise safe...

its treason..by those who done it..as well as those who let it remain
Posted by one under god, Friday, 9 October 2009 8:50:11 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Forrest had not long ago sent this tweet to Brian Howes:

" @Brian_Howes 'Ode to McCrae' is my original work. All are free to use it subject to http://bit.ly/4dxGyv "

The tiny URL link therein is a link to the OLO legals page.

Forrest then thought he should make it expressly clear what the origin was of the work that had inspired his little poem, so he sent this tweet shortly thereafter:

"@Brian_Howes Col JohnMcCrae wrote 'In Flanders Fields' http://bit.ly/12iifx NB2/last para "

The tiny URL link in the tweet is a link to a web page outlining the history behind the wearing of the red poppy on Remembrance Day, and giving some background to the writing of Col John McCrae's famous piece of war poetry, 'In Flander's Fields". This is the expanded link to that page: http://www.defence.gov.au/army/traditions/documents/inflandersfield_1.htm

Now the funny thing was, the characters 'NB2/last para' were missing from the tweet when it went up on Twitter. The text of the second last paragraph of the web page to which Forrest had been referring, and had given a link, was:

"Although the Red Poppy of Flanders is a symbol of modern times, legend has it that the poppy goes back even to the time of the famous Mongol leader, Genghiz Khan, as the flower associated with human sacrifice. In the 12th and early 13th centuries, the Mongol Emperor led his warrior hordes on campaigns south to the conquest of India, and west to envelop Russia as far as the shores of the Black Sea."

All pretty innocuous stuff, surely.

Then Forrest checked his own Twitter link ' http://bit.ly/12iifx '. Well blow him down if it didn't now give a '404', "The Web server cannot find the file or script you asked for ....."

Forrest immediately checked whether the expanded link would work. Same thing, another 404!

Was someone taking Forrest seriously?

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2107#44207

Someone who could fiddle with Twitter, and the internet? Who could that be?

Forrest thought he had better read John Pilger's article after all!

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=9518
Posted by Forrest Gumpp, Sunday, 11 October 2009 8:17:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
yes only in the last few weeks have i noted that my pplaylist selections dont play anymore...many youtube clips now come up not permitted in your cuntry

noted this last week...quote,<<..Will Murdoch, AP Come After Shortnews?
http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=81071

In a statement Friday, media magnate Rupert Murdoch said it's time for.."content kleptomaniacs"..to pay...He was referring to search engines and other web sites..that aggregate news content from multiple online news sources.

The publishing industry..has been lamenting over how they can increase online revenues..and with the recent economic downturn,..they have stepped up their efforts to regain profits..lost due to decreased advertisers in their..conventional media outlets.

The Associated Press is approaching the situation from what they call their AP3P strategy.

The three P's..being..protect, point and pay.

The AP may offer licensing levels whereby some sites can pay to receive news a bit earlier than others.

Source: www.csmonitor.com

there is a link to the articles of faith
http://news.google.com.au/news/more?pz=1&cf=all&ned=au&cf=all&ncl=dGjyZo43cHFcSlMT8eXa7KmRpEsGM

as well as this
Don't Knock Rupert Murdoch's Paywall Plan
and a link
http://blogs.bnet.co.uk/sterling-performance/2009/10/09/dont-knock-rupert-murdochs-paywall-plan/

looks like the police state poisening people into ignorance is near complete

noting murderoc's high definition dosnt travel well in telstra's pipes...its clear what the outcome is intended to be done...as soon as possable...noting krudd visited murderok...and the censure began

have noted less 404...but more..you not permitted to know this info/nor acces this site...even then..the alex jones show..has had two days of replay...being allowed to be put out to the world..while his live/show gets suppressed...in real time..you tube download time has doubled

its time we recalled security-agencies..own the searchengines..and the media..

this is likely the last time..we can note that armed forces..[civil and miletary]..run many cuntries..systems within systems..are shutting down freespeech...to serve their masters..for pathetic baubles and lol..[honours...via dishonour/via disservice]

hut its no less that the sheeple will let them make/take
its time to tax exclusive franchise..

we own the rights to voice our words
que warrento...by what right
Posted by one under god, Sunday, 11 October 2009 10:19:53 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy