“A wise wife never lets her man leave home with his seminal vesicles full. Any man worth his salt with a decent sex drive, needs to be unloaded at least every second day."

Bollocks Peter – though no doubt marriage was invented (by man of course) to accommodate the male’s sexual urge in the olden days to make him appear more respectable!

However, you rather conveniently use a biological foundation to excuse man’s infidelity and "lust" but dismiss a biological foundation for masturbation. Rest assured if masturbation lacked a biological foundation then masturbation would not be physically possible so enough of your cherry picking – chimps do it, canines do it, everybody’s doin’ it!

Of course, unlike Homo sapien, the canine usually practises sexual restraint until he’s invited to copulate by a bitch that’s on heat! Often on the other hand, if Homo sapien female is not keen to have sex due to menstruation, pregnancy, illness, conflict or temporary separation, the human male goes on the prowl.

Futhermore, biological foundations and your “lust” can no longer be used to excuse the state of the modern world due to the lack of restraint practised by the human species - 6.7 billion Homo sapiens and rising! I say: “Bring back masturbation, castration or expect a good floggin’!”

” Usually a strong sex drive goes with a higher intelligence and often with a greater drive in all things.”

Really – well Peter just consult the thousands of rape victims who’ve been assaulted by the males with a strong sex drive driven by that “higher intelligence!”

Nevertheless Della Bosca’s extramarital fling could have once been regarded as trivial. That’s before he denied offering Meagher the Cabramatta candidature, just hours before sitting member Newman was murdered; denied the allegations of Iguana-gate; denied plotting for the role of Premier and denied the recent allegations by Kate Neal - his version versus the rest of the world!

Therefore, from the opinion of a “leftie,” Della Bosca should have tied a knot in his “upstanding member” and practised the restraint constituents expect of one in public office.

*though no doubt marriage was invented (by man of course) to accommodate the male’s sexual urge in the olden days to make him appear more respectable!*

Not so dickie, because of course the female urge to raise offspring
is pretty strong. As our human females can't simply chew a bit of
grass for a living, they needed a male to help provide the resources.
So the clever little hussies came up with a plan :) They'd provide
the male with a bit of nookie and give him a reason to stick around,
if he helped provide the resources to feed the offspring. the rest is
history.

Pairbonding was the result.

* the canine usually practises sexual restraint until he’s invited to copulate by a bitch that’s on heat!*

Not so, for male canines commonly try to shag peoples legs :)

Now if you were a sheep dickie, as long as you stood still long
enough, some male would shag you, no flowers, no dinners, no
consent, no alimony either!

So you human females are not doing so badly in comparison.

Yabbies attitudes and belief system sum up evolutionary ideology very well. Unfortunately with thinking like this it is no wonder people justify rape and lack of self control. It is about as scientific as gw but what the hec!

Ah well the thread worked GY it would truly make a great subject on why we think the media is any different than us.
Just as many lies here, conclusions jumped to.
Blindness to the fact sex is not evil and just maybe we all or surely most of us do not want our past uncovered.
I have a problem, look at my frothing at the mouth condemnation of my party in NSW.
Can anyone think I would favor JDB?
I know the bloke,few who assault him here do.
I have insulted the bloke.
I knew that old rehashed rubbish about the murdered man, its years old dredged up as if it was yesterday, a story from a vindictive woman, unloved and vindictive.
I understand some females have had leave that alone, affairs.
your point remains do we truly understand this bloke, did Clinton continue to be a great leader after he got found out, did it impact on his leadership?
It continues to bring a grin to me poor Della if he had tipped the garbo just a few weeks ago would be well liked by now, riding a horse without legs, doomed to die but well liked.
He had a plan, be honest my Labor fellow travelers.
We are done for.
But we you and I rank and file, will be generations undoing the damage.
I take that challenge but never again after Latham will I hand out HTV for a dead party, a murdered party so badly served by its Representatives its self destruction should be achieved by calling an election now.
Let the other lot of useless beggars have it .

“Not so dickie, because of course the female urge to raise offspring
is pretty strong. As our human females can't simply chew a bit of
grass for a living, they needed a male to help provide the resources”

Err……Yabby – Seems you have not yet realised that it was the human male who asserted that only he could provide the resources for women’s survival. It’s currently called the “glass ceiling” to keep the little woman in her place (a mini-Taliban eh?) However, historically, if the little woman got out of line, the bully could beat, shame, rape, murder, burn or abandon her with impunity.

Nevertheless, you remain ill-informed on the overall history of woman's survival. Native women have possessed as much or more power within many tribal cultures as men. This role deteriorated as European values infiltrated but it's a role that has experienced a strong resurgence within European societies over the last 50 years.

Alas, the primordial male feels threatened by women who take on the roles of Prime Minister, CEOs of multi-national corporations or become builders, electricians, plumbers, carpenters, civil and mining engineers, geologists, truckies, train-drivers, scientists, astrophysicists, academics, doctors, brickies, politicians etc. and all "supposedly" on equal pay too.

And while a happy (and honest!) union between the human male and female is desirable, all of the above puts paid to your unmitigated swill on females' total dependency on the male Yabby. It was and is a con job!

In fairness, misogynists generally represent the desperate and the dateless, and we know you derive your information on human behaviour from the literature resting on your bookshelf.

Though strange how you permit your farm dogs (who by nature are pack animals) to shag people’s legs rather than putting them out of their misery by having them neutered. If one is so forlorn, I guess watching sheep copulate too is not so whacko though I’ve heard very strange tales about misogynistic farmers who hold such interest in the sex lives of sheep.

*Yabby – Seems you have not yet realised that it was the human male who asserted that only he could provide the resources for women’s survival*

Oh rubbish. As hunter gatherers, it seems that females were commonly
swopping sex for meat. At least thats how it worked in some of
the South African bushmen studies that I've read. Helen Fisher
reckons that it was the advent of the plough, which was too heavy
for women to operate, that made the difference, with more formal
marriage etc following.

* Though strange how you permit your farm dogs (who by nature are pack animals) to shag people’s legs*

Ah Dickie, but my farm dogs are female, old age is getting to you,
for you dragged that one from the air.

*I guess watching sheep copulate too is not so whacko though*

It happens on farms dickie. Thats the start of those packets of
lambs chops on your supermarket shelf!