The Forum > General Discussion > Is it time for a National Police Force
Is it time for a National Police Force
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
Posted by JBowyer, Sunday, 9 August 2009 6:26:33 PM
| |
Wasn't the original decision for creating an Anglican church, as opposed to a Catholic Church in England, decided by the King Henry the eighth so he could divorce his present wife and marry his mistress?
I don't think it was originally because they didn't want to follow the Pope. I am sure you will correct me if I am wrong. When I went to school way back in the fifties, before Ming the Merciless set out to destroy Australia’s legal system, the entire story of how the English broke from Rome, was taught to primary school students. The break from Rome occurred in 1215, at Runnymede on the Thames, when some Barons and their English Churchmen, abolished what was until then the Divine Right of Kings. Continental Europe, vulnerable to armies sponsored by the Pope, from countries like Spain and France, was brutally oppressed until Napoleon came along. With their ditch, the English were safer, and able to adopt the Holy Bible as their Constitution. The law that made the break with Rome official was the Magna Carta Statute, in 1297. Professor Neil Rees said one day at Newcastle University, the law is all about power and money. The Roman Catholic Church by 1533, in England had accumulated enormous wealth, and in the name of Almighty God, had vast estates paying no taxes to the British Crown, with enormous numbers of virtual slaves on them doing the work. Henry VIII broke with Rome totally and gave the land to the indigenous English who were working it. The issue of his wife was just the one popularly promoted. The next great change occurred under James the Second, when he set out to restore Roman Catholic Rule. The English had to find a Protestant King, and called in William of Orange, to restore the Constitution. The Coronation Oath 1688 ( Imp) here did that: http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=456 That law is still in force in Australia, but we need a National Police Force to ensure it is obeyed. Paul Keating’s government has enacted all the laws we need but the States refuse to accept them Posted by Peter the Believer, Monday, 10 August 2009 6:34:40 AM
| |
I was fortunate today, Monday 11th August 2009, to attend at the Australian Federal Police headquarters in Sydney. I was in the company of a very worried person, who is the victim of a scam being perpetrated on a lot of people in New South Wales involving money laundering, and loan fraud. Afterwards I did a troll through the Act that gives the Australian Federal Police its power, the Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth) .
Here is what it says about Banking fraud. The Australian Federal Police has jurisdiction in any matter involving National Infrastructure, by reference to Ch 10 Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth) . S 400.1 sets out Definitions: 1. Every Bank is an authorized ADI. 2. Instrument of crime include all the forged approvals, the forged mortgage, the forged Taxation Statements and Balance Sheets. S 400.2 Meaning of dealing with money or other property. 1. A person deals with money or other property if: (a) The person receives, (i)possesses, conceals, or disposes of money or other property (iii) Engages in banking transactions relating to money or other property: and: (b) The person does any of the matters referred to in paragraph (a) (ii) by means of a communication using postal, telegraphic or telephonic service within the meaning of Paragraph 51 (xx) Constitution. or (iii) In the course of banking. 2. S 400.3 (2) A person is guilty of an offense if: (a) The persons deals with money or other property and (b) Either: (i) the money or property is proceeds of crime; or (ii) There is a risk the money will become the proceeds of crime. (c) The person is reckless as to the fact that the money or property is proceeds of crime, or the fact that there is a risk that it will become an instrument of crime ( as the case may be). And (d) The value of the dealing, the value of the money and other property is $1,000,000 or more. Penalty: Imprisonment for 12 years or 720 penalty units or both. ( 720 penalty units is $79,200). That’s real money Posted by Peter the Believer, Monday, 10 August 2009 6:18:38 PM
| |
i agree with belly their are good cops and bad cops and politicians ,and lawyers, new south wales still covers up daruk boys home , maybe our new head of police will look into this as he should over ride all other police so that we can get the coruption in every state clean , will this happen who knows only can hope their is such a thing as justice but so far their is not look at all the forgotten australians , just being wipe and swept under the carpet in the courts sysytem . if this is not corpution what is , i even wrote to our G.G and sent her the emails i sent the previous G.G can only hope she will act for us forgotten australians and give us justice as our prime minister isn't
Posted by huffnpuff, Friday, 14 August 2009 11:47:10 PM
|
Give it a rest for goodness sake who remembers what the original article is now?
I agree politicians have effectively allowed lawyers to rob and pillage and they themselves are in many instances pedophiles and fraudsters and their colleagues protect them.
I think what we need is a federal police squad devoted to investigating all lawyers especially those who go bankrupt to avoid paying tax. One QC was said to have been bankrupt six times? A national disgrace but expecting the wallopers (Who are mostly boneheads) to do something about this is too much. I think we need a national federal crime commission and its charter is to DO something rather than report on what should be would be done.