The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Is it time for a National Police Force

Is it time for a National Police Force

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All
Did you know that in 1900, virtually anyone could create wealth for themselves, by simply writing up a Complaint Sworn and Summons, and filing it in a Local Court of Petty Sessions. This right to create wealth was made a Commonwealth right in 1914, with the Crimes Act 1914 ( Cth) and it absolutely enrages lawyers.

This was the original PPP, Public Private Partnership, initiated by the Kings of England, for the preservation of democracy. Lawyers are not democrats, they are despots. To ensure it remained democratic, the English Government provided in 1487, that no Judge could dismiss a private prosecution, and the only good discharge from an allegation of a crime, was a discharge given by a democratic jury of 12. The Statute is 4 HEN 7 Ch 20, [1487] and was in force in 1828, when the Australian Courts Act 1828 gave democracy to Australia. It provided half of the total Crown revenue.

The Statute recites: much profitable to the king as well as to every of his subjects that them will sue and maintain. Because Judges were doing the Pope thing and selling indulgences, or selling get out of jail free cards, if you like, the Statute removed the right of Judges and Magistrates to give a good discharge, and made it the prerogative if a jury. Only a jury in a democracy can give a good discharge.

This is what our Constitution has preserved. It is a magnificent document, and you can download it here. http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=473

There is a source of great personal wealth just waiting for you to learn how to access it. Before you can get to it you need to have a National Policeman, to give the weight of the law to your democratic rights. Your best mate should be an Irish immigrant called Brendan O’Connor the Minister for Home Affairs, responsible for the Australian Federal Police. What he needs to do is open a desk at AFP headquarters, where a clerk can accept a Complaint, and issue a Court Attendance Notice on your behalf. The AFP should then ensure a fair trial
Posted by Peter the Believer, Saturday, 8 August 2009 11:57:11 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The decentralization of the might of the judicial power of the Commonwealth does not suit the petty criminals who run the States. The judicial power of the Commonwealth is the power to enforce the Constitution, and the laws made by the Parliament of the Commonwealth, and under the Constitution, S 118 also brings in the laws of the States, however only in a so far as they are not in conflict with a higher law, That of the Commonwealth.

On the link posted below you will find the law that makes all Judges and Magistrates in Australia criminals. They are criminals because they have no Police to keep them honest. It contains two Statutes, one giving free election, which really means an election to pay a fine or go to jail, and the other the Habeas Corpus Act 1640 16 Charles 1 Ch X. which makes it a crime for a Judge to impose a prison sentence, without first offering a fine.

http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=485

Col Rouge asks who is going to pay for a National Police. The Criminals are going to pay of course. Just as in China the State makes the family buy the bullet to shoot an offending member of the family, so the law makes a criminal pay for the law enforcement that catches him.

This has been reinforced by the Federal Legislation enacted by Paul Keating’s government in 1995. The penalties of 500pounds and 1000pounds imposed in 1640, are bankcard penalties today, and no deterrent, but the penalties of 25 years and 17 years imprisonment for doing what was prohibited in 1640, imposed by Sections 268:10 and 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth), are not Visa or Mastercard breaches.

17 years converts to a fine, of $112,000 and 25 converts to a fine of $165,000 and if they knew that by awarding costs orders before a trial has been had, that is the penalty, I suspect Judges and Magistrates in Australia would suddenly find a hidden streak of honesty. The lawyers who gleefully seek costs orders, are liable too. Oh just give us a National Policeman
Posted by Peter the Believer, Saturday, 8 August 2009 8:42:00 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
There is one man in Canberra who can either ensure Kevin gets a second term, or probably ensure that Peter Costello comes out of retirement and does what Bob Hawke did to Bill Hayden, and makes this Labor Government a oncer. That man is the Honourable Brendan O’Connor. He is a good looking young man, like so many Australians he comes from Irish Stock, and he would like to see a republic established here. To understand him a little you should read his first speech.

http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/firstspeech.asp?id=AN3

While trained in law he has never been a solicitor, or admitted to the bar, and although born in London, he came to Australia aged six. He started to represent workers at the age of twenty four years old. The greatest opportunity he now has is to make the Rudd government the one that restored democracy to Australia, and the de-facto republic it was before 1952.

A republic must have a separation of powers, the separation of powers that comes about by having a fair just and impartial judiciary. Most of what Brendan hated about work-choices, was the powerlessness it inflicted on workers. The 100 workers at the Mandurajh Railway, threatened with a $100,000 fine, just for organizing as unionists. The only reason the Liberal’s thought they could get away with this and Labor even thinks they can, is because the judiciary in Australia is made up of lawyers.

Brendan is smart. He is able if he wants to, to make Australia One Nation, and follow the English model of rebellion against Roman Style Government. The Irish hated the English because the English denied them the same Christian government they enjoyed. They appointed RM’s in Ireland. Resident Magistrates, and universal jury trial was not extended to Roman Catholic Irish.

Mr O’Connor has it in his power, as Minister for the AFP, to make Australia into a republic without a referendum. All he has to do is accept that the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and Constitution is Australia’s paramount law, and make it possible for us all to enforce it, by jury trial
Posted by Peter the Believer, Sunday, 9 August 2009 12:24:04 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Americans dumped the English Crown,for the very same reason that we are calling for it to be abolished. It was dumped because it had not obeyed the English Constitution in its dealings with the Americans and we will probably dump the Crown here as well while we continue to let the States think there can be a separate Crown in every State. See

http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=365

Brendan O’Connor is probably a Christian. He would know the fundamentals of Christianity which are that there can only be one Almighty God. His Boss certainly knows that, but the politics of the Labor Party have suited the atheist belief in multifarious Gods, because they have State Governments in their power. If Brendan cannot fix the State governments of Australia, and bring them under the Commonwealth Crown, before Rudd must face the next Poll, Costello will be able to harness the dissatisfaction with all State Governments, and use it to unseat the Rudd Government. The reality is that Rudd must face the electorate before any of the States Governments that are absolutely on the nose throughout Australia.

To establish the Paramount Commonwealth Crown, Brendan O’Connor must accept that Labor enacted S 13 and 15F Crimes Act 1914 ( Cth) to ensure the continued republican government in Australia established by the Constitution, and enacted s 28 Crimes Act 1914 ( Cth) to ensure that democracy continued. The State of New South Wales has introduced Court Attendance Notices, and authorized clerks in the Police Force and other authorities to issue them. Brendan should take a leaf out of their book.

In every major town in Australia, there should be a clerk employed by the Australian Federal Police, with a Rubber Stamp, so that a Court Attendance Notice can be issued to any one who seeks, backed by the full might and glory of the judicial power of the Commonwealth. That power and glory is manifested by the words in Ch III Constitution, and the binding nature of S 80. The judicial power of the Commonwealth can be exercised by a jury of judges, not by a Judge
Posted by Peter the Believer, Sunday, 9 August 2009 12:46:30 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Just so we know why I advocate a National Police, I believe we need one because we are currently living in a godless Nation, ruled by pagan Judges. I happen to believe the Parliament of the Commonwealth is ordained by Almighty God, and unlike the Pope is not infallible. It is created in the image of the Anglican Church, and unlike the Roman Catholic Church, is not beholden to one man, no matter how Divinely Guided that one man may be.

This radical republican government was established in England after the English Catholics rejected Papal infallibility, and enacted the Gospel of Matthew 18:15-20, as the Magna Carta: The Great Charter of Liberties. It has had its bloody episodes, and in one case a Statute contained these words: Whereas the Late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counselors, judges and ministers employed by him did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom: Pages 40 Imperial Acts Application Act 1980 ( Vic).

I also happen to believe that no State Parliament is so ordained, and if the Brumby leading Victoria, is not to destroy the Commonwealth Government, the system established to check and balance arbitrary power, by the Australian Constitution, must be enforceable, and enforced.

The power to indict, by issuing Court Attendance Notices is the power to revue and call in question the deliberations of a not infallible Anglican Protestant Government. The Governments of every despotic State are based upon the Roman Catholic model. The States are despotic. The Premiers are the equivalent of Godfathers, in a mafia like system. We elected Kevin Rudd to end the cooperation between the States and the Liberal Party in oppressing Australians. He has not yet done it but he has chosen Mr O’Connor.

The exercise of the judicial power of the Commonwealth, must be universally available, and evenly applied. Its power is demonstrated by this extract from a Textbook.

http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=238

This textbook was discontinued in Australia after Universities started to teach that the States can be Gods in their own right
Posted by Peter the Believer, Sunday, 9 August 2009 1:16:47 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Peter the Believer,
I don't believe the Police Force or our court systems should have anything to do with religion or Gods, given the diverse number of religions and Gods worshipped in this country.

Wasn't the original decision for creating an Anglican church, as opposed to a Catholic Church in England, decided by the King Henry the eighth so he could divorce his present wife and marry his mistress?
I don't think it was originally because they didn't want to follow the Pope.
I am sure you will correct me if I am wrong.
Posted by Moondoggy, Sunday, 9 August 2009 5:09:15 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy