The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Pot bellette?

Pot bellette?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All
Good one Foxxy, and PP, unless your friend makes a habit of it, the chances of a prosecution are slim, it costs money, and they need a reason. Even then it's highly unlikely any magistrate will impose more than a token penalty, if they convict at all.
It's just a standard part of Docs bullying tactics, and as long as people stay calm and sensible, they'll be safe, sort of the same as you treat an angry dog!
Posted by Maximillion, Friday, 3 July 2009 7:09:54 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
the bullying tactics to which you refer
are the enforcement of law
enacted exclusively by men's legislatures.
DoCS workers administer inequitable law.
Posted by whistler, Friday, 3 July 2009 7:55:49 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy I may buy it for my son and kill two birds with one stone! He is sitting here half way through a celebratory night with his designated driver and I have not decided on anything, by the looks of him he will be a wreck tomorrow anyways.

Thank you Whistler it is strange what you say that since the whole department of community sevices is overloaded with estrogen.

Thanks Max… this woman’s story that is backed up by medical records, toxicology reports, hospital apologies etc is incredible. Her and her son had a reaction to an insect that releases things in to the air. It caused huge amounts of pain to both of them and they go to hospital in a screaming panic... he is taken and her locked in a padded room and sedated, assumed a druggie. Months later and her child remains in care still. The circumstance and person in the family he is placed with is not good and apparently the boy deteriorates. Now I thought I had heard most stories, this one I absolutely believe. Why the media would back off I have no idea.

http://medent.usyd.edu.au/fact/caterpillars.htm

I reckon I tricked her in to telling me this much and I have seen her on other sites and pieced a story together like a super sleuth, so aren’t I clever and will go to jail happily for my devious nature. Oh and I made bits up just to make it interesting and the whole thing is a complete lie. Then I changed the time line and it really happened 40 years ago and it was really a man and his daughter.

What I will never understand is why in any Gods name do DoCS never ever say “my bad” and give a child back?

Victim Compensation? Is there some recourse? Why do they do this, oh look it isn’t just DoCS, FSA are horrible and Queensland’s Child Safety have generated whole sites dedicated to DCS hate. The only ones I can find little on except in the media is NT and WA. Tassie Pfft.
Posted by The Pied Piper, Friday, 3 July 2009 10:00:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Fear not PP, the Docs system is the same here in NT, and I have lived in Tassie and heard local horror stories there too.
That department seems to be a magnet for the hairy-armpit brigade, and Australia-wide is filled with be-studded psychotic femnazis like out windy-lipped friend here!
Personally, I’d like to see the lot of them thrown out on their keesters, and the whole thing re-built from scratch, with normal people running it,…. fat chance!
Posted by Maximillion, Saturday, 4 July 2009 8:09:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Pied Piper, men refuse women the right
to bargain collectively over the welfare of children
with provision of a women's legislature,
then expect women to collectively administer
law enacted by men's legislatures.
no wonder so many find child welfare departments dysfunctional!
Posted by whistler, Saturday, 4 July 2009 1:14:52 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
“Personally, I’d like to see the lot of them thrown out on their keesters, and the whole thing re-built from scratch, with normal people running it,…. fat chance!”

Hey Max, it’s all pretty bloody awful. Fractelle awhile ago suggested middle management be removed (not a direct quote there).

The caseworkers/field workers I have come across really care, they’re really nice people. But they admit to having no authority and always having to go to their managers for every request. They are the ones that everyone is contact with and usually hate where in reality they’re more like little soldiers following orders.

Wonder where the WA, NT and Tassie people are. The other four have certainly embraced the internet as an outlet for a lot of rage, hurt and injustice.

“The Pied Piper, men refuse women the right
to bargain collectively over the welfare of children
with provision of a women's legislature,
then expect women to collectively administer
law enacted by men's legislatures.
no wonder so many find child welfare departments dysfunctional!”

Whistler could you give me an example of legislature that is male and one that would be female? Please keep it simple.

But I don’t know if it is the welfare of children on the whole but only specifically after they remove them from family. They will not admit a mistake, they would rather keep a child in care and go to court repeatedly. I have never known anyone in the department to be held accountable for this so with no responsibility for these actions without fact why on earth don’t they just give a child back?

Is this stubbornness a female trait, when under this men’s legislature do they not know how to concede fault?

The only person in DoCS to say “we were to blame” to me was a male. He probably ended up neck deep for his honesty.
Posted by The Pied Piper, Saturday, 4 July 2009 2:05:32 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy