The Forum > General Discussion > The real reason for the NRL group sex 'scandal'
The real reason for the NRL group sex 'scandal'
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 87
- 88
- 89
- Page 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I miss the scouts though. I really was left hanging about scoutmaster and scout-master. Or was it scout master.
Robert,
Fractelle's never going to give you the approval that you so desire. BTW, that fence must be real tired from you sitting on it all the time.
TPP,
Man I always get labelled as abusive, a psychopath no less, but I didn't even get on the list. I'll double my efforts!
Antiseptic is like a Palestinian settlement, but the others are like Israel.
'I would have preferred an explanation from the idiot-magnet Anti calls his ex-wife.'
Oooooh! You back from your meeting? How did it go? Hey, how do you know his ex-wife didn't 'make' him like The Joker made Batman? Oh, sorry that was wasted, you didn't even get my star wars quote on the other thread.
benk,
I have similar ideas. People who want to be offended often are. Cold and Callous etc have no meaning on an anonymous forum. Less so when talking about people you've never met. If anti disputes a statistic about rape or something, people think that's offensive. It's a bloody number man!
eg. He questions when someone says they were raped, whether they are lying. Very offensive if you know the person, and you say *to* them 'I wonder whether you are telling the truth'. Not offensive at all when it's someone you don't know and you've heard about it on the news and your discussing a topic and questioning all the assumptions therein.