Fractelle:"A-septic denigrates women generally and uses personal insults on many female contributors to OLO for no more reason than they hold differing POV's"

Au contraire, lovey. Do try to find evidence of your claim, won't you? We're all agog, I'm sure. As I have said and demonstrated frequently, I never initiate an exchange of personal comments_ I leave that to the less intellectually gifted of my readers. As for denigrating women generally, nope, not I, try again. Most women are still entirely useful members of society, contributing much and demanding little, just like most men. Then there are the ones like you...

Now off you toddle and see if you can fit a few more mirrors in around the house, although someone as self-obsessed as you are will no doubt already have that covered...

Fractelle, Tuesday, 21 July 2009 11:56:53 AM

Lighten up, smell the roses and let them fight it out. They had their own thread until we all happened along.

You have a good head on your shoulders and it is wasted on the BS and flaming on both sides. The WWF tag team stuff is really, really funny. There should be keyboard warning signs because I have spluttered more than a few cups of coffee over mine recently.

Fractelle (and CJ, Master and others) g'day,

As to hostility towards women, there are too many posts to enumerate,
but Cornflower and Blenk and a few others remain blind to those. One example,

<"My experience as an adult is that women rarely acknowledge such courtesies and even exhibit annoyance at them sometimes, so for a time I deliberately did the "wrong" thing, just to see what response I would get. For example, if there was a woman approaching the door at the same time as me, I'd wait for her to open it (and believe me, I always had to wait) and walk through ahead of her. If I was the one to get there first, instead of holding it I'd walk through and let it go, forcing her to catch it. I never saw a single woman fail to make some sign of annoyance at my behaviour, mostly subconsciously I suspect... Must be biologically determined...">
Posted by Antiseptic, Wednesday, 10 June 2009 8:03:08 AM
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2848&page=0#64530

I figure that a bloke would be just as annoyed at such discourtesy. It's such a blatant expression of hatred towards women.

Cornflower and others have no trouble overlooking or adding to the endless stream of lies and nonsense meant to reinforce certain stereotypes about women and feminists. Unrelenting attacks on other posters seem to pass muster with them as well - for example, the constant belittling of CJ Morgan by referring to him as a canine. Cornflower's sanctimonious lecturing about how others should post has to be some version of the 'menz who would be victims fraternity', or a joke, or both.

pynch.

Keyboard warning next time please.

pynchme:"I figure that a bloke would be just as annoyed at such discourtesy. It's such a blatant expression of hatred towards women."

LMAO. failing to open a door is an "expression of hatred toward women". After several hours searching, that's the best you can do? Surely, a "woman-hater" like me who posts daily must have left dozens at least of comments generally disparaging women? Off you go and see if you can't find a few - after all, it's not as if you've anything useful to do.

How many men have you opened the door for in the past year or so, dear? You obviously hate men...

Now we've got the pest control out of the way, would any of the feminist apologists like to have a go at my questions put earlier? Is it a "good" thing that Australian women outnumber Australian men at university 3 to 2 and if so, why?

What does this :

" Women have entered the workforce in greater numbers and in some traditionally male fields. But most women earn lower pay and do more part-time and casual work than men.
More women are seeking equality in family and intimate relationships with growing expectations of shared child-rearing and domestic work.
A backlash against feminism has painted feminists as 'man-haters' responsible for many social ills, including concerns about boys."

have to do with educating boys? It appears on a Qld Education Department website purporting to be about educating boys, so it must have some relevance, surely? Unfortnuately, as a "recuperative masculinist" (LMAO), I'm unable to work out what that is. I was sure one of the highly-educated professional feminists here will be able to enlighten me, but so far no one wants to have a go.

Is it an initiative of the Qld Office of Women? Nah, that can't be right, they don't do anything at all...

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/govt-spent-six-times-more-on-staff-than-programs-20090717-dn4t.html

"The Queensland government's Office of Women has spent six times more on its office than on actual programs to help women".

It must be a grrrl thing...

Anti: "LMAO"

Sorry to interupt, what does that stand for?

"The Queensland government's Office of Women has spent six times more on its office than on actual programs to help women".

Seriously? I think that's an Aussie thing Anti. Shame aye. And be grateful, what if they didn't spend that on the office and turned their focus on you...[smile]