The Forum > General Discussion > Jump at it?
Jump at it?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I deed I deed but it's a niche market.
The economics of the meat V beef/sheep is no where as good. Thus farmbers are reluctant they just want to grow things that have big established markets. Like wheat etc that actually costs more per tonne than it yields. (that is if you factor in all bounties etc).
Sheep/beef compact the soil which causes dead zones on tracks to water holes that can be seen from in satellite photos real depressing stuff.
The yanks still run campaigns against roo meat with bogus scare campaigns of mis treatment. I remember seeing one and I tracked down the group that played it ....they were backed by the beef farming Association.
So long as we have that sort of negative campaigns to contend with I think you'll find investors will run away. especially when they can stick to what they know.
Max,
As I understand it some beast don't tame that well and I understand that some species of roo are included. There is some doubt that they can be penned for fattening. Check out their breeding I think there's a hic cup there. Because they are a mob orientation one Alpha male gets all the booty from a maximum number of females there are issues with other males fighting(damaging stock).In short density and area are key issues. I guess the issue is the animal husbandry (sorry whistler but this is what it's called)is largely unknown and money for research is lacking because commercialization is still an unknown.
While I agree with the principal. I read somewhere that very little of the roo is good for the marketable meat. Unlike moo Which is 70% meat worthy I think the roo is as low as 35% (but I maybe wrong...I am getting old).
Smiles all around.
Not so testy examinator. :-)