The Forum > General Discussion > Smart democracy
Smart democracy
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
At risk of boring senseless readers who can follow deductive reasoning, let me explain again why the Constitution of Australia mandates rape, with further explanation for those unfamiliar with law, history and Australian democracy.
There is nothing in the Constitution of Australia to say that women should be prohibited from being elected to Parliament yet women were prohibited from being elected to Australia's first Parliament.
Why? ... because that was the intention of the Westminster Parliament which enacted the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900.
Black letter law is accompanied with baggage, that is, the intention of those who enacted the law.
Moreover, Australia's Constitution has never been amended to overturn the doctrine that men boss over women which accompanied its enactment.
The Westminster parliament enacted men's legislatures only, from which women were prohibited.
In 1902 the Parliament of Australia legislated to allow women to vote and to stand for Parliament but this legislation did not overturn the doctrine that men boss over women because legislation enacted under a Constitution cannot change the doctrine accompanying the Constitution.
Australia's Constitution provides that only a referendum can change its black letter law, and consequently, the doctrine by which its black letter law was enacted.
All the Commonwealth Franchise Act 1902 did was extend the practice of male supervision of women to within the nation's legislatures.
After 30 years, anti-discrimination legislation enacted under the Constitution of Australia has had the effect of "no drop, or even of an increase" in violence against women.
Moreover, since the doctrine accompanying the black letter law of Australia's Constitution mandates that men boss over women, the courts are required to treat women and men differently.
As strange as it may seem with all it's talk of impartiality, that's the law under which Australians live today.
Clearly, the Constitution is at fault.
Since power is derived from legislatures, only provision for both a men's legislature and a women's legislature can replace the doctrine that men boss over women with the doctrine that women and men are their own bosses, thus achieving equity between women and men.
(1/2)