The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Foot and mouth disease to be brought to Australia,- 'Thank You ''Mr Burke and Kevin Rudd

Foot and mouth disease to be brought to Australia,- 'Thank You ''Mr Burke and Kevin Rudd

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All
On reading those 2 sentences written by PALEIF, it "initially" seemed obvious the he was connecting KFC with those inhumane practices. I have no doubt that is EXACTLY the implication he intended, but it seems he has been clearly well versed in the legalities of sentence construction when it applies to libel. It's worded in such a way as to "imply" a KFC connection, yet at the same time gives him plenty of room to manoeuvre a denial of that "implication" if someone calls him on the charge.

That's clever use of the language, and also utterly disreputable use of the language. Son, if you really wish to fight against animal cruelty, as any sane and humane person would, then the first place to begin is with your own credibility, your own honesty and your own integrity! Being a smart arse with your sentence construction does your cause no service at all.
Posted by TZ52HX, Tuesday, 24 February 2009 8:09:19 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Don't hold your breath, Pericles.

And TZ52HX - there's absolutely nothing clever about it, trust me.

Reminiscent of the Infinite Monkey Theorem, PALE&IF occasionally posts something that makes sense, but I've come to the conclusion that it's entirely random.
Posted by CJ Morgan, Tuesday, 24 February 2009 8:33:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Pericles,

This is all I can find about KFC-
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/07/10/2300557.htm

http://www.google.com.au/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&q

Wasn`t it you who posted about this poultry industry some time back on that Animal Liberation thread. Perhaps not I might be wrong. Perhaps it was someone else. Never mind its not important.

The only other thing I can tell you is our lawyer /member did take statements off four woman and has been making contact with media.

I am not at libity to disclose what was contained in those statements and in fact I havent seen them.

I do know however that they all told the same story as to how these birds were kept killed.

I hope he manages to get the story out. Its very difficult for the media at times given the graffic pictures not to mention content to film privacy ..etc.
If anybody can it will be him. I know he was very upset for weeks about it and still is.

I hope this helps.
Oh and there was NO mention of KFC. Dont think they would know where the chooks went.

possibly a dozen different outlets

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/07/10/2300557.htm

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=594236

http://www.throng.com.au/big-brother/pamela-anderson-gives-kfc-a-twis
Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Wednesday, 25 February 2009 12:57:04 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
On reading post 2 written by TZ52HX, it "initially" seemed obvious the he was connecting on to OLO as a 'first poster'given the history on olo to take a swipe at pale .

I have no doubt that is EXACTLY the implication he intended, but it seems he has been clearly well versed in the legalities of sentence construction when it applies to libel.

So we would like to say sorry Nicky, because we know thats 'certainly' not you.

Had we wished to say, to the Prime Minister, Pamala Anderson, said KFC were throwing birds into boiling water- the fact is we would have could have. Given that its not been denied by plants and PETA have it on video.

"However thats not what we said." We are perhaps as you said a bit more versed in law than PETA and yet to see any direct evidence of KFC carrying out such practises themselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFgbHK6yP2g

Robert a member/lawyer in particluar was impressed especially considering he`s the one who has spent hours upon hours in his own time typing statementsof four poultry workers . He`s been deeply effected by it.
Well at least Morgan gets to see some pictures of Pamala that he addmiited in the past to enjoy. So there you go something for everyone, including gooses that jump in and make a turkey`s out of themselves.

We are sincere in our efforts to educate people as to what is really happening on in this country behind closed doors of DPI codes of practise.
If you have a heart then think of the animals pls and let us do our job. Thank you
http://blog1.rspcasa.asn.au/2008/07/23/naked-chef-exposes-brutal-layer-and-meat-chicken-industry/
Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Wednesday, 25 February 2009 9:44:45 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
PALEIF, so let me "try" at least to interpret your mangled English.

Are you saying, "Nicky, because we know that's certainly not you" as a sarcastic statement that really means, "Nicky, because we know that's certainly IS you"? Note, that in an earlier post you "implied", for some reason, that I am a person called Nicky.

Also, you have claim that I have registered here for the sole purpose of "to take a swipe at PALE".

Now, let's consider these two accusations from you. In your initial post you imply that KFC performs animal cruelty. I reply by asking you to "prove it". That post was, at that stage, my only post in my history here referring to you. I had written about 20 or so posts on various subjects.

As a result of my two word challenge "prove it", you have come to the conclusion I am someone called "Nicky" and that the sole purpose for my presence on this forum was to "take a swipe at PALE" as a "first poster".

So there we have it, when challenged with a simple "prove it" this person has INSTANTLY come up with 2 conspiracy theories, (1) I am a person called "Nicky" and (2) my sole purpose on this site is to get PALEIF, from my very first post.

PALEIF is obviously immature, and I now realise quite uneducated (you only need to read his/her mangled English). He/she refused to apologise to KFC regarding the false implication of animal cruelty, and instead tries to make up silly little "conspiracy theories" if anyone calls him/her on the dishonesty of the false KFC animal cruelty implication.

Unfortunately, by writing such idiot posts, he/she does no service whatsoever to the wonderful cause of animal protection and the many organisations involved. With his/her mangled, uneducated English and paranoiac little conspiracy theories, the welfare of animals is left behind. Whoever you are, maybe you should stop "claiming" a connection to this great animal welfare and protection group, as your idiot posts obviously bring their fantastic work into disrepute.

YOU are a LIABILITY to the cause.
Posted by TZ52HX, Wednesday, 25 February 2009 12:17:38 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Indeed, TZ52HX.

However, I agree that we should be concerned about the dangers of foot and mouth disease - particularly since its variant 'foot in mouth disease' is already here, as exemplified in PALE&IF's garbled posts.

More seriously, I agree that PALE&IF's comments here are generally a liability to the cause of animal welfare.
Posted by CJ Morgan, Wednesday, 25 February 2009 12:34:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy