The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > For the sake of OLO ...rule changes?

For the sake of OLO ...rule changes?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. ...
  11. 40
  12. 41
  13. 42
  14. All
This is it, there are little teams and sides and so forth... I don't think we can moderate each other at all, lol

I'd always be on Col Rouges side!

but the heavy bullying and slander... not just the usual little spits we all have, that can be pretty nasty...
Posted by meredith, Friday, 30 January 2009 10:17:17 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Agree with your sentiments Examinator!

As is clearly seen from some of the responses, it ain't going to happen :-(
Posted by Q&A, Friday, 30 January 2009 10:58:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy,

My apologies for wrongly assuming that you were accusing em of being a troll. However, I think if you wish to put Christopher on a pedestal as some kind of righteous guardian against trolling on OLO, you need to have a closer look at his conduct on other forums.

(FWIW, I have, very belatedly, come to the firm conclusion that Israel, and not Hamas, was at fault for the recent bloodshed in Gaza. (more possibly elsewhere))

---

Christopher, do you or don't you concede that the use of a second account on OLO could ever be justified, or do you believe that it is your sacred duty to, without exception, denounce and pillory each and every transgressor you come across?

---

Christopher wrote, "the ridiculous thread was only 'disrupted' by his endless denial of using sock puppet accounts ..."

That's demonstrably untrue.

In any case, Christopher, as I have shown above, you stated yourself your intention to disrupt that forum and you proceeded to do so in defiance not only of my wishes, but of the wishes of a number of other forum participants.

---

Christopher wrote, "(Daggett) still stalks me around other discussions trolling for a fight, though."

Not true.

I couldn't stalk you even if I wanted to.

Once, out of curiosity, I did look at a succession of your posts, but found the content so stupefyingly boring that I have never since dared do so again.

What does occur, however, if if I do see a post from you on forum on which I have an interest and notice what I consider hypocrisy or double standards, I will draw that to the attention of others.

In fact, it is obvious to me that it is you who has been stalking me for years and are continuing to do so and not vice versa.

Clearly your pride has been wounded on a number of recent occasions, so when another poster called me "a wack job" this morning (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2465#55440), you thought you saw your chance to go in and snipe at me from beneath his skirt (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2465#55446).
Posted by daggett, Saturday, 31 January 2009 1:44:38 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I in my early posts as well as the spelling and other problems, fell for the baits and behaved as badly as the trolls.
We need to remember some of the worst offenders are in no way rational, are unaware they are doing it.
the thread is much needed, but have we the Right to ask for changes, it is after all privately owned.
First if we contribute the funds we may get ways to improve the forum.
We have rules that are not obeyed now, caps, its a rude thing to post so many not excepted in any forum.
I think however we should self discipline , not reply to trolls.
leave threads that are miss used, and avoid those who trouble us.
if we did bring too many new laws just maybe we would be stopping freedom to speak.
Sea Kittens thread has become an advertisement, not for animal welfare sadly, but a warning not all who are in that camp can comment rationally on? animal welfare!
Posted by Belly, Saturday, 31 January 2009 5:35:27 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Meredith sincerely appreciate by your support… :- )

But a word of warning, some around here (no names (for Bronwyn’s sake), no pack-drill) will later denounce you as a heretic, so I hope you like BBQ… they will try to make one of you… but I figure you have sufficient character to stand the heat :- )

Q&A - ah you must be applying to be on the list of names seeking elevation to the Committee of New Rules and Public Safety

Belly “but have we the Right to ask for changes, it is after all privately owned.”

Echoing my previous comment in reference to the “host”


So I guess, regarding those who “privately own OLO”,


Examinator would suggest -

"The king must die so that the country can live."

– Maximilian Robespierre –

But don’t hold your breath Examinator –

parodying Shakepseares Julius Caesar “beware the 10th of Thermidor” (28th July)

Oh I do so love to bring some histrionics and culture to OLO…


But can also address the expectations of the new Committee for new rules and public safety…

How about 3 Billy-goats gruff… it comes complete with a troll

http://www.sterlingtimes.co.uk/bill_goats_gruff.htm

but if you want to to exercise the gravitas we normally associate with the lord high Examinator,

try this gem of a site

http://www.sau35.org/curriculum/Science_curriculum/Kindergarten/ThreeBillyGoats.htm

and don’t forget about the “Timeline for Thematic Unit to be woven within the daily schedule and specials:”

maybe the committee could consider that as this humble "citizens" suggestion for includion among the new “Rules” and fit it in just before afternoon sleep..

happy camping playmates
Posted by Col Rouge, Saturday, 31 January 2009 6:48:11 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Oh to correct my errors...

Belly - I did not refer to the "host" (Private Owner of OLO) on this thread but on the "parallel universe" thread "An Aboriginal Nation state", upon whose authority we have both refered and defer to.



This 'umble "citizen" throws himself prostrate, at the feet of "the Committee for New Rules and Public Safety" and trusts they are merciful in their judgment of him for such a terrible error and personal failing. . . .

(and with further thought to my previous sentence, more culture...

Buddy Holly song "That'll be the day" instantly springs to mind -

although not with the same sentiment which Buddy implied)
Posted by Col Rouge, Saturday, 31 January 2009 7:07:02 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. ...
  11. 40
  12. 41
  13. 42
  14. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy