The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > For the sake of OLO ...rule changes?

For the sake of OLO ...rule changes?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 17
  7. 18
  8. 19
  9. Page 20
  10. 21
  11. 22
  12. 23
  13. ...
  14. 40
  15. 41
  16. 42
  17. All
Examinator

Yours are indeed words of wisdom. Nevertheless, I must insist that the only troll on the Sea Kitten thread, to which Belly refers, is Belly.

Alas, trolls, with vested interests, who raise threads to inflame and defame, lack acuity hence any ability to address pertinent and relevant facts on the topic. They continue to bleat their sermons (with insidious references to their “opponents”) without acknowledging the issues in the very topic they have raised.

One can either walk away from these trolls who persecute the defenceless, or participate in a bun fight. No freebies either for guessing who dons the boxing gloves but hopefully, only on provocation!

“Or pointing out that the flaws in both facts and logic in a discussion, defending my self or supporting others against lies and plagiarized unimaginative insults?

"If this is what is meant by being high and mighty, condescending? Then we agree I am guilty and proud of it. I don't see shame in apologising when I err quite the contrary.”

Well Examinator, I for one am proud to be acquainted - and I commend you for your ability to conduct an unambiguous and logical pattern of debate.

Hang about man – you have much to contribute to this forum!
Posted by dickie, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 4:20:04 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear examinator,

Welcome back. As dickie said, we need your input
on this Forum. You have been missed.

And as for you Houellebecq, I blow you a great
big raspberry (politely of course).

Cheers,
Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 5:57:15 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dickie, chin up, I can not agree with much you post,but its your right to have your say.
And why would I be upset by your views of me?
Never! see my only defense against your words meant to hurt, are read your post history, all of it, I rest my case.
Now if you knew how very many Roos Wallaby's Kolas and two Wombats all baby's I bottle fed.
If you only knew of the dumped dogs and kittens [not fish]I bought home after finding them dumped on the road.
My slaves, two dogs one dumped one bought Sky and Blue, little half Foxys girls sleep in my bed.
Yet you who can not know me slander me?
I love animals, my gut still turns as I remember slaughter yards, cattle waiting in line knowing they are to die.
Its life Dickie we eat meat we always will, we are the result of evolution not the madness of non existent Gods.
We even in that fairy tale Bible are told we have rule over animals.
IF activists did not resort to the stuff you use, maybe you would find more support.
Out of nothing but respect for OLO I must make every effort to stay away from animal rights threads, it is warlike and nothing is ever gained, yep got it right I did go back to sea kittens, still think its madness.
Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 6:47:06 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
meredith

"I notice you have decided your correct on my reasons to defend Boaz with out any answer from me, why even ask me, hey :)..."

Sorry if I've misread you. I hadn't read enough of your posts to know offhand whether you were a Conservative or not, though I had a feeling you were.

It was the following sentence of yours that I was going on, which I thought at the time indicated you were a fellow Conservative of BD's, but looking at it again now I'm not so sure.

"I thought he was great, I didn’t worry about the religious stuff and just read his posts, for conservative posts, they were pretty good…"

So, sorry if I've got it wrong.

Daggett

"I certainly invite you to examine the evidence and form your own judgement."

I looked at the thread but I still don't really know enough to make an informed comment I’m sorry.

I don’t know the full extent of the exchanges you’ve had with CJ in the past and how they would have contributed to his assessment of you. I agree, in this thread at least, your style didn’t appear provocative, so I can only assume that it was the content of your post that CJ was lampooning.

Again, I haven’t followed the 9/11 conspiracy debate, so don’t know whether it’s the rubbish CJ clearly believes it to be, or whether there is something more to it. In my experience, I’ve always found him to be a pretty good judge of any situation, but I'm not sure on this one. I did notice that Forrest and RObert were much less dismissive and I always consider them to be good judges too!

So, I’m sitting on the fence on this one I'm afraid.
Posted by Bronwyn, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 11:46:07 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Brwonwyn,

What does my being conservative have to do with it?
Posted by meredith, Wednesday, 4 February 2009 12:01:09 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
meredith

"What does my being conservative have to do with it?"

When I first expressed disbelief that you could defend BD the way you were, I made the comment - "Being a fellow conservative is clouding your judgement here I think meredith. :)"

You then criticized me for jumping to conclusions about the reasons why you defended BD, so I assumed you were upset with the 'conservative' tag. What else was there in that brief sentence to object to?

I see from this quote of yours from earlier on in the thread that I was right all along and that by your own admission you are a conservative.

".. I am not a thug I am just a conservative..."

You're allowed to be, no big deal, I couldn't give a continental whether you're a conservative or not.

But I sure wish you could follow the debate and stop sending me round in endless circles over trivialities.
Posted by Bronwyn, Wednesday, 4 February 2009 12:53:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 17
  7. 18
  8. 19
  9. Page 20
  10. 21
  11. 22
  12. 23
  13. ...
  14. 40
  15. 41
  16. 42
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy