The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Anti-Abortion site deemed

Anti-Abortion site deemed

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All
Censorship is just wrong.

But for killing stealing and raping, Life all choice.

Another thing with banning extreme content is that we don't get to see where extreme people stand on things, I like to be able to see for myself, who hates who and why...

It's a scary world, so full of misinformation, I'd at least like to be able to judge for myself and not rely on SBS or A Current Affair both bias in their own directions.

If things are censored I won't see a true reflection of the abortions people or the terrorists or the left wing right wing.

There is always the x button if it is to much.
Posted by meredith, Saturday, 24 January 2009 4:36:57 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Do we know if these pictures were put up with consent.

Or has some high handed persons violated these women’s right to privacy?
Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Saturday, 24 January 2009 9:06:48 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Chainsmoker “For the record, I wouldn't expect a government with Tony Abbott in it to behave any differently.”

But a government with Tony Abbott in it DID Behave Differently, by not implementing the process back when it was first presented.

“Contemporary governments are all morally and motivationally shonky. For the record, I wouldn't expect a government with Tony Abbott in it to behave any differently.”

That is why I support smaller5 government with less power, rather than the socialist model which erroneously believes you can manage a nation centrally, without seriously curtailing the natural opportunity of all its independent and interdependent variables of tyhe electorate which it is supposed to serve.

“More worrying, this is being contemplated by an Australian government. You'd hardly call Australians a nation of trouble makers. What we are though, is a nation without any constitutional protection from this sort of thing.”

That mirrors my continuing concerns to the real motives of anyone who claims to be “socialist”. Socialism is used to mask some darker intents and in this exercise in censorship, the very vehicle to pursue those darker intents is launched.

Ultimately, Meredith says it well “Censorship is just wrong.”
Posted by Col Rouge, Sunday, 25 January 2009 10:02:04 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I stopped listening to anything pro-lifers had to say when they started killing people.
Posted by StG, Sunday, 25 January 2009 12:07:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
stG writes

'I stopped listening to anything pro-lifers had to say when they started killing people'

Yea and their are dozens of those here in Australia aren't there? Makes a lot of sense to listen to the pro deathers or murderers
Posted by runner, Sunday, 25 January 2009 1:47:54 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
StG “I stopped listening to anything pro-lifers had to say when they started killing people.”
And runner “Yea and their are dozens of those here in Australia aren't there? Makes a lot of sense to listen to the pro deathers or murderers”

That is your choice. I have found ignorance becomes those from the anti-abortion brigade.

Listen or ignore, your choice, just as it is my choice to support every womans right of choice in the matter of abortion.

The difference between us:

I have an open mind, which is able to listen to both sides of the debate and reach my own conclusions.

I understand that if I were female, you would deny me the right to reach my own conclusions in the matter of abortion.

Hence, I vocally and politically stand square against those who would use censorship and those who would deny abortions.

IF you would like to turn this into a debate based on logic, I am ready to challenge all and every faux-justification you are prepared to promote with reason.

But if you prefer to keep the issue churned up with "emotionalism", that is OK I am happy to address that debate too.
Posted by Col Rouge, Sunday, 25 January 2009 2:02:27 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy