sillyfilly wrote: Just a quick thought: can someone investigate the possibility of having two christian martyrs named Polycarp? (two centuries apart that is).

The name, Polycarp, was inspired by the miracle of the loaves and the fishes. Polycarp (many fish) It also is in anticipation of Christians returning to the faith of Jesus and becoming Jews. The ceremony can use the old jazz standard.

The Imitation of Christ

Six feet two, eyes of blue
Jesus Christ, he was a Jew
Has anybody seen my lord?

Big hooked nose, There he goes
Preaching so that everyone knows
Has anybody seen my lord?

Speared by a Roman
In the abdomen
Blood gushing out

Rose from the dead
So it is said
People believe without a doubt

Jesus died, still a Jew
He's a Jew so why aren't you?
Has anybody seen my lord?

When another flood comes the ark can be filled with many carp in anticipation of making gefillte fish. We can also store our cars for after the flood and have a mutistory polycarp ark.

Well David it looks like when they have lost the debate they resort to foolish talk, in am endeavour to brush their embarrasment away. They can no longer defend their immoral position so this subject is finished.

david f: << When another flood comes the ark can be filled with many carp in anticipation of making gefillte fish. We can also store our cars for after the flood and have a mutistory polycarp ark. >>

Hilarious - keep them coming!

Philo - before you go, don't you want to correct your false claim that Henson acted illegally, or are you another fundy bulldust-artist like Porky?

Well you should have asked the question was it constitutional.

Then you would have to find a constitutional government to say he acted illegaly.

If you can find one then you had better prove it, with facts not fiction.

CJ.. you provided a classic example of why:

a) Apologising to you has little value
b) That you expect apologies for things you declare 'lies' when you just don't understand what's going on.

You tend to HOP to some kind of very tightly defined (mis)understanding of something....then.. you SKIP into using that as a straw man, then you JUMP into accusing another party of 'lying' or deliberately fabricating falsehoods.

Let me demonstrate your folly.. (this becomes boring that's why I just let it go and leave rather than continually correct you :)

I said: "used against us"

You interpreted this as meaning "A specific terrorist act"
which in your mind appears to only mean some kind of jihadist guy fawkes event.

Then..having manufactured your straw man.. proceed to attack it vigorously with all your might. "your falsehood was deliberate"

Notice what happened? (besides your brain snapping:) you firstly decided that I mean't "a terrorist act" and then.. you accuse me of deliberately running with a known falsehood.

Who's falsehood? not mine that's for sure.

NAUGHTY BOY.. you need some detention for that

"used against us" could mean many things. Planning, conspiring.. overt actions.. all come under the heading of 'used against us'.
Even passing on of critical information to others more willing to carry out such attacks is 'used against us'.

Shane Kent will be retried on this matter (trips to Afghanistan where he is alleged to have undertaken explosives training)

Izhar ul-Haque is to stand trial for undergoing terror training with Lashkar e Toiba (Pakistan).

So... my case for 'used against us' is made well and truly, the only debatable issue is to what extent and in what form.

But back to Henson :) oh wait..no space.

Bill Henson has violated the law of social decency and responsibility to children by his photoes, and by his perousal of girls in the school yard a place unnatended by parents.

CJ how many girls have you raised or had custody of? Myself two daughters, two step daughters and four foster daughters. No responsible parent exposes the privacy of their daughters for all the world to perouse.