Dear CJ ... one of the reasons I seldom make formal apologies to you is that I'm never wrong :) hahah de haha.. thought you'd love that.

No.. of course I have my moments of error, like Pericles (I think) I was wrong on an occasion about 5 yrs ago 0_^)but you have this rather frustrating characteristic of leaping on any hint of admission of error like a pack of Hyena's on a newborn Gazelle calf and then running with it, throwing it every which way until finally tearing it apart.

One example is your newly manufactured myth of my "Macca's diet"... see how you transformed a meeting of convenience at a well known local landmark after a medical appointment into a DIET.... talk about playing fast and loose with truth and telling 'porkies'....

In fact you have on one occasion gone through numerous posts of mine simply looking for anything which could be construed as 'error' in order to attack my overall credibility. You've not concerned yourself with the fact that I've actually admitted an error and moved on..nope...you drag it up, swing it around, place it on billboards for the next decade.. which of course made me wonder about your treatment of captive flies during your youth :)

Here is your method.

1/ Declare something 'wrong' (even when it is simply disagreement)
2/ Challenge the person to apologise (for the issue which you either misunderstood or misrepresented)
3/ Pester them for the next 10 yrs about this.

Now.. if I adopted your style I'd be reminding you of your factual error here for the same period :)

I prefer to just move on with 'issues'.

Now let's see, Porky. Last month you posted this:

<< But let's not forget.. we are in Afghanistan because of it being used as a haven for terrorist training camps which were used against us on our own soil. >>

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2092#44433

To which I responded:

<< What act of terrorism "on our own soil" was it exactly that caused the Australian government to send troops to Afghanistan? >>

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2092#44440

But of course you never responded, instead deserting the thread as usual when your lie was exposed. If it had been a simple mistake, you could have just corrected your error and moved on - but you chose not to.

I put it to you that your falsehood was deliberate, and designed specifically to foster Islamophobia. Likewise, your deliberate distortion of the case of the homophobic Swedish pastor who was found not guilty on appeal, and in your current distortion in another thread of the ultimate result of the prosecution of the two Islamophobic Christian pastors in Melbourne.

The reason that I persist in reminding of you of cases such as these (and there are many more) is in the hope that you'll eventually realise that your pattern of habitual mendacity does your odious cause no favours.

PALE&IF - I do wish you'd stick to your word and not post to me. This is a forum where adults interact. If you don't like adult humour please feel free to visit any of the thousands of children's sites that exist for people of your mental age, or better still, do something that actually improves the lives of animals.

CJ

To paraphrase a gender specific saying:

I believe we have truly 'separated the adults from the children' on this thread.

And I include Henson as one the those whose maturity goes over the heads of the demonstrably childish.

The naive childish minds believe that it is OK to display nude children in static poses in public places for pedophiles to admire. They see no social responsibility for the protection of children from predators. Perhaps they themselves have no children to protect, or do not see a need to protect children from abuse.

Is Bill Henson happily married and have daughters? If so why did he not photograph his own daughters? Is it because he has no emotional attachment to the children he photographs and treats them merely as photographic models he can use and discard without responsibility?

I just wish that the Council of Nicaea had never happened, then we wouldn't have a son of god nor a holy spirit nor a virgin birth; then Joseph, Mary and Jesus could have been one little happy family. Just a quick thought: can someone investigate the possibility of having two christian martyrs named Polycarp? (two centuries apart that is).

One has to ask since you are calling henson a high priest,

does that mean he is sitting next to labor,unions and kevin rudd

due to the heiner affair