Sancho: << ...by writing "CJ Moron" in every line you're making yourself look like a tragic and hopeless basket case and a debater of no merit whatsoever >>

Indeed, and I'd suggest that the same principle applies to Col Rouge, who seems lately to be allying himself increasingly with the OLO frootloop fraternity - if only to spit some bile.

Sancho - undoubtedly there's more to the story than the 'official' line, but of course that doesn't mean the 9/11 Truth nutters actually have a case.

Sancho

Why do you see the splinter in Daggett's eye but fail to see the plank in the eye of the Moron?

So Sancho pray tell, which description in the Moron's limited vocabulary would most appeal to you?:

"Fruitloop, wingnut, freak show, nutbags, liar, Humpty Dumpty, bull sh**t artist, looney tunes."

Feel free to add to the Moron's list. His repetitive and moronic hyperbole has grown rather tedious!

Err.....just a reminder Sancho if you intend responding. Unlike the Moron, could you endeavour to stay on topic.....there's a good fella!

Sancho,

I'm most interested in your point about the Mossad agents. Were they wearing ID badges that said SECRET AGENT? Or can a New York cop spot a "kike" at 30 paces?

Paul, I found a version of the Mossad story at http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17260.htm

I saw similar elsewhere but this was the most detailed I found in a quick scan. If anything it backs much of the official line on the attacks.

R0bert

The 9/11 Truthers might be on to something after all:

<< New Oliver Stone 9/11 Film Introduces 'Single Plane' Theory.

'World Trade Center', which stars Nicolas Cage as a dedicated Port Authority officer who stumbles on secret evidence amid the rubble and carnage of the terrorist attack, tells a story quite different from what Stone called "the official government line" about the event. According to the film, at 8:46 a.m., a lone commercial airliner flew diagonally through the North Tower of the World Trade Center, maintained a circular holding pattern for approximately 17 minutes, then struck the South Tower before heading to the Pentagon.

After its collision with the center of American military operations, the so-called "magic plane"—which variously and ingeniously identified itself to air-traffic controllers as "American Airlines Flight 11," "United Airlines Flight 175," "American Airlines Flight 77" and "United Airlines Flight 93"—took to the skies once again, landing at a top-secret "black-ops" Air Force base in West Virginia, where it was reloaded with a group of clones from another shadowy government program that Stone described as "shocking."

Stone, who said he did not have time to explore the clone angle in the three-and-a-half-hour film, plans to do so in the sequel, 'September 12'. >>

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/new_oliver_stone_9_11_film

On the other hand, Al Qaeda aren't happy:

http://www.theonion.com/content/video/9_11_conspiracy_theories

dickie: << Fruitloop, wingnut, freak show, nutbags, liar, Humpty Dumpty, bull sh**t artist, looney tunes >>

You must be feeling right at home then. And how exactly did your comment fit James' very strict parameters for discussion?

"And how exactly did your comment fit James' very strict parameters for discussion?" (CJ)

Rather than ambushing someone else's thread CJ, why not analyse what is being said by other posters? Had you taken your hand off it for a brief second, you would have noticed that I had excused myself from debate:

"Thank you for an interesting thread Daggett.

"I'm not sufficiently researched to make much comment," (Dickie Sunday, 5 October 2008)

Nevertheless, I remained interested in reading the theories of others but alas I have been force-fed a dunny-truck load of unprovoked, hate-based invectives, passed off as factual, which leads me to an accurate conclusion on your reasons for "engaging" in this debate!