PaulL please put me in the factelle, Foxy and C J Morgan camp on this subject.
You make me very happy I belong in a different paddock than you..
Why re write factelle post in every word it is spot on no need for the extreme rudeness to one of our best mannered posters.
Please be here the day the results of Americas election come down.

Belly,

Maybe you know that CJ and his mates Dickie and Rainier have decided they're going to devote a couple of discussion topics to slagging off Col. Now I clashed with Col before but the infantile, even at times racist behaviour, of these idiots is just incredible. Now it seems CJ wants a third general discussion topic where he can poke tongues at Col. So what extreme rudeness are you talking about, because there seems to be an awful lot of it about.

As for the results on election day. I really don't care that much. I'm pretty sure whoever wins will disappoint the socialists. I really don't think Obama's going to be the man all you progressives hope, even if he wins.

Nice to see I'm still getting up the little wingnut's nose, even when I'm not talking to him.

Paul.L: << safe at home behind your computer >>

At least it's my computer and not the boss's, unlike the one you use predominantly during work hours to spout your anonymous wingnut diatribes.

<< have you actually contributed to a discussion lately that wasn't PURELY flaming? >>

Sure - look at my posting history. I could ask you similarly if you'd made a comment lately that didn't mention pubescent or prepubescent girls.

Col brings it on himself, but I'm sure he's pleased to know that he's got Paul.L to back him up - he obviously doesn't have many friends.

However, I'm not so sure that dickie would regard herself as one of my "mates".

Grow up yourself, Paul - and mind your own business.

Dear Fractelle, CJ, Belly,

Thank you for your kind words,
and support.

I am so sorry that you got
involved in this matter.

However, I must bear a great deal of the
responsibility. I should have chosen my
words far more carefully, and above all
I should not have reacted.

I've got a lot to learn when it comes to
dealing with all sorts of opinions on a
public Forum such as this one.

I'm going to have to learn
not to take things personally.

However, I don't want anyone to continue
to argue over something that has been
given more attention that it deserves.

I've learned a good lesson out of
all this. Let's move on.

I do apologise to both Col, and Paul.
I was wrong to be so arrogant.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
And I admit that it is the wide variety of
opinions that attracted me to this Forum
in the first place.

So I should practice what I believe in.

Foxy apology accepted.

I repeat, “I have always considered you, along with everyone else, free to post or decline from posting as you see fit.” And of course to post your heart felt view and opinions.

But that is a position which I expect everyone to reciprocate toward myself and others whose views may differ from your own.

I do, sincerely look forward to your resumption of posting.










Fractelle “Col, just so you know - I am casting personal aspersions on your character and I am completely justified.”

You are entitled to post whatever dross flows forth from your enfeebled mind.

However, I would be mildly interested, just in passing, how you can actually “justify” the “I am completely justified” bit,

I look forward to reading your “justification” and tearing a new orifice in it.

But before you write anything, please bear in mind, I am entitled, in the pursuit of “aspersion” equality, to respond in kind.

CJ,

I’m back at UNI so my computer is my own. I don't know where it was you got the idea that you know anything about me, but you should always remember the old saying “Its always better to sit quietly and have people think you’re stupid than to open your mouth and prove them correct.” You seem to be proving it an awful lot lately.

He says >> Sure - look at my posting history. I could ask you similarly if you'd made a comment lately that didn't mention pubescent or prepubescent girls.

I looked at your posting history, 6 of you last 10 posts have solely consisted of pathetic personal attacks. Mostly name calling. And it seems you’re the one who cannot have a discussion that doesn’t mention pubescent girls (go through the history, I dare you). Seems you have a real problem there.

It’s my business when you and your idiot mates decide that you need 3 threads to attack someone. They’re all public anyway so I’ll call you on your childish behaviour whenever I come across it.

I see you have now taken to twisting the screen names of your pet hates. Very grown up. Seriously, are you a pubescent girl or what?