The Forum > General Discussion > Rape victim's rather seeks papal audience
Rape victim's rather seeks papal audience
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
Posted by Spikey, Sunday, 20 July 2008 4:40:46 PM
| |
Good Evening Everyone,
Thanks for all your responses - to date. They're all greatly appreciated and very valued. I came across an interesting article in, The Age, Saturday, July 19, 2008. A2 - Culture And Life section, p. 23. It's a review of a book by Paul Collins, called, "Believers: Does Australian Catholicism have a Future?" UNSW Press, $34.95. As Barney Zwartz, The Age religious editor tells us, the book, "Asks the hard questions that the hierarchy will not confront and the young are too inexperienced to know or articulate. Collins is an excellent commentator, very well informed and a meticulous and detailed researcher. He writes as an insider, with a good knowledge of how the Church works, but also with a measure of detachment." We're told that Collins, "Has long been a leading spokesman of the more progressive group of Australian Catholics but has been marginalised by traditionalists who have regained control in Rome and Australia since Vatican II. What will make this book hard to ignore are the facts and figures and concrete examples." "The Australian Church cannot assume it will survive. Its numerical heyday was before Vatican II, which brought considerable change, but the traditionalists have been winding that back for decades and new generations are increasingly disconnected from the Church. The sexual abuse crisis had weakened trust, and the priest shortage is already dire." I intend to get hold of a copy of the book. As the article points out, "Catholicism has proved infinitely adaptable over two millennia, only finding energy to change often when things seemed dire." I'm hoping that this will occur if enough pressure is brought on. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 20 July 2008 6:59:31 PM
| |
The media driven frenzy aimed at the Pope in regards to sexual abuse was incredibly hypocritical. Why don't the ABC/SBS demand that the NSW Premier apologize on behalf of the abusers in his Government. Why does not one of our prominent Aboriginal leaders say sorry on behalf of the seismic sexual abuse done by many of their elders. Why does not all the State school teachers unions say sorry on behalf of many of the teachers who have committed sexual abuse. Why does not the SBS/ABC insist on their own CEO saying sorry for the kiddy fiddlers in their own ranks.
I am no fan of the pope or Catholic church but the media driven hate and bias on this issue was incredibly unbalanced. Then again our gay friendly ABC/SBS has not been balanced for a long time. I do hope that next time the earth worshipers have their next violent gathering that the ABC/SBS insist that Bob Brown gives a personal apology to all those people who have been abused among their ranks. Posted by runner, Monday, 21 July 2008 11:15:07 AM
| |
Runner you have got to the crux of the problem. The media have a lot to answer for. Politicians won't lift a finger while the heat is on the Catholic Church alone.
George adduced an exception to the reporting rule which shows just how much relevant information the supposedly in depth coverage of Lateline missed thus resulting in Pell being accused of a cover up. Naturally the pretend cover up guaranteed prolonged exclusive focus on the Catholic Church thus keeping victims like Michael who didn't experience Catholic clerical abuse in the cold. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24040493-7583,00.html If more reporters went to that much trouble to uncover the truth abuse in governmental institutions would be heavily in the news and Rudd would be apologizing very quickly. Posted by mjpb, Monday, 21 July 2008 12:31:17 PM
| |
mjpb,
The sad part is that so many of those who see themselves as intellectual on OLO seem to get much of their information from these pathetically inadequate national broadcasters. I suppose it confirms what they want to hear. Some like Foxy to her credit seem genuinely concerned about those who were abused. Her emotions obviously cloud her thinking but her intentions appear genuine. Others however seem to somehow want their own actions justified by misrepresenting others. Posted by runner, Monday, 21 July 2008 1:52:18 PM
| |
Dear Runner and Mjpb,
The media covers what's currently making news. World Youth Day, the Pope's arrival, Pilgrims from all over the world - all this placed the media emphasis on the Catholic Church. But without this attention - would there have been a Papal apology? I believe that its thanks to media pressure and emphasis that it happened. And I'm grateful that it did. But, I'm hoping that it won't stop there, and that the apology will initiate change within the church when it comes to dealing with victims of sexual abuse. As for victims within Government Institutions, as Michael (huffnpuff) knows, I've emailed the PM, written to newspapers, emailed the ABC, and done what I could. If all of us were to continue putting pressure on our elected officials, perhaps someone, somewhere, will eventually take notice. We can only try. But with perseverance - we may just succeed. As someone once said, "Even the snails made it onto the ark." Perseverance brings results. Posted by Foxy, Monday, 21 July 2008 2:32:25 PM
|
I absolutely agree with you that it's now time for Prime Minister Rudd to apologise to all victims who were raped and abused in the state run instituions of Australia. It's long overdue.
PM Howard failed and used the excuse that it was the States and churches that were responsible. What a weak leader he was when it came to questions of morality. The kids who were raped were Australian children but Howard wanted no part in showing the lead in redressing the wrongs that were done to this nation's institutionalised children.
So if Rudd fails us you have to ask the question, What's the point of winning power if you fail to use that power to put right the evil things that were done to Australian children?
Keep up the pressure Michael. We need people like you to make the ignorant knowledgeable, the spineless courageous and the uncaring caring.