The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Suggestions for OLO

Suggestions for OLO

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 20
  7. 21
  8. 22
  9. Page 23
  10. 24
  11. 25
  12. All
Would you like me to post some of the cross-referenced entries than clearly demonstrate what I have said?

Nicky
Posted by Nicky, Wednesday, 3 September 2008 1:01:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hello Nicky,
Are you calling me a liar?
Nobody, would or could access my ID or password.
It seems to me that you are a stalker and have a personal vendetta re pale.
You seem to be overly consumed with PALE, its members and my ID and to me its very clear that Animal Welfare is certainly not your main agenda.

Graham, in the past you told us to ignore Nicky, because it makes it harder for you to deal with the problem.
I have waited almost 2 years for you to deal with this.-
That is why I stopped posting. How much longer until you enforce your own Forum rules?
Posted by Macropod Whisperer, Wednesday, 3 September 2008 10:35:58 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Also Graham I seem to recall you saying to Robert that anybody bring this up again would be banned.
You ruled on this and this is what you said-
"Robert I do not think there is a rule against several people using a tag- rather a person using several tages.
I do not see that pale get anymore posts than others. I am putting an end to this and if its raised that person will be banned."

After which for peace sake Tayn and Antje both decided to post under their own ids.
I think pale, Antje and Taryn have all bent over backwards to put a stop to this.

NOBODY is posting in anybodys somebody elses tags-= There is no need to and we are very upfront as to who we are- unlike others.
Its a cowardly thing to do to allow someone to contiune to accuse an organisation of lies and cheating on your forum while using a false Id themselves
Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Wednesday, 3 September 2008 11:59:27 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Example Post 1 (extract)

cAnd yes, when it comes to the crunch you run except for this low standard level of reply. There is no need for you cuphandle to use dirty, filthy uncivilised language if Nicky is not willing to respond to questions asks.

Just say that you can not answer the question but don’t go diverting the topic because of “ your” failure or inability to respond.

Not one of you has offered a solution or alternative to the cruel live exports what so ever and yet you believe to be above everybody else and can treat others like what ever.
You met with me the wrong person.

Cuphandle said:
I suggest that there is an opening for you ..

MS:Your filthy language does not make two wrongs right.
Your own uncivilised words speak for themselves and they are there for everybody to read …
Isn’t it marvellous to think one can get away with it just by using a Nickname??

By the way you are wrong. People are listening- they comprehend what’s written on the Forum.
They think about it and are capable of making up their own minds.
Pale does not have all the answers but tries to get the info when being ask…

Just because you started the thread does not mean that you have the right to use inappropriate language and bad-mouth people for speaking the truth.
The truth is “already” out there for everybody to read.
May be you are illiterate? No offence meant.
Where is your proof to substantiate your claims to back up your bad mouthing? Pale can provide evidence by the numbers

MS:No, wrong again, you destroy your own or what’s left of it.
Unlike you PALE is straight forward and does not want sympathy for its cause.
Pale’s priority is and always was animal welfare.
Its agenda is to inform the public to broaden their view about the Animal Welfare in AU in general and to help farmers to get a better deal for their product.

Macropod Whisperer, Saturday, 2 February 2008 8:56:42 P
Posted by Nicky, Thursday, 4 September 2008 12:09:35 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Example post 2 (extract)

Then when run off opening another thread ignore us which is rude and praise peta.

Our members donate to other groups on a regular basis.
peta being one of them'AA another. Its a policy of ours to help others!
We are not anti peta so why are you so anti pale.?

Peta refuse to discuss any of the projects that Bridgett fully supports.

I find THAT simply amazing.

We wont be bullied and we ARE the only ones with the contacts the MOUS the plans to actually do something about live exports and Intensive farming .

Instead of AA and PETA welcoming these projects like Bridgett they have flatly refused to work with us.

Instead of being delighted we are treated as the enermy.

I find that beyond the pale
Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Thursday, 24 January 2008 12:07:19 PM
Posted by Nicky, Thursday, 4 September 2008 12:11:57 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Example post 3 (extract)

Gertrude cant post at the moment. GY didnt like her comment on forum owners.

I can say personally you are so right about the liberation lot.

This thread is only a small example of what they are like.

People like Nicky follow like sheep with no idea of the industry. I loved this comment

@(Yabby, as I have pointed out before - don't bitch about it, do something about it.@?

Note Yabby how the only lot run by Gertrude has been treated. What a joke she says do something about it!

Its interesting that Nicky still prefers to hide behind a false name while myself Antje Struthmann and RSPCA QLD along with Gertrude are happy to be open and upfront.
Oh No Of course Nickys not speaking on behalf of the others. Of Course Ha!

Not one thought of her own on this forum in over two years.

Then she goes on with this-

(I don't care why the live trade exists ...

Yabby I cant understand how people can be so stupid. Of course we need to understand why the live trade exists !
In order to fix anything you must fully understand the reason for it in the first place.
No wonder why the Government dont take them seriously.

What terribly damage these people do towards Animal Welfare to make such irresponsible statements
Posted by Macropod Whisperer, Monday, 7 July 2008 8:01:46 AM
Posted by Nicky, Thursday, 4 September 2008 12:14:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 20
  7. 21
  8. 22
  9. Page 23
  10. 24
  11. 25
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy