"What pisses me off no end is when so-called refugees turn up and make demands that run contrary to our tradtions,mores and values and then want to overtly and covertly threaten us with destruction and death if we fail to get what they demand."

Which refugees do this, socratease?

"There is absolutely no way that the Government will be recognising polygamist relationships," Mr McLelland said. "They are unlawful and will remain as such."
.
The truth is that ample of men are living also in de facto relationships while married and Centrelink still pays for their de facto wives as if they are in a marriage. The only thing missing is the wedding with the other women.
.
I view Centrelink should not make payments based upon a De Facto situation as it is contrary to one man-one woman marriage.
.
The commonwealth has Subsection 51(xxvi) by which it can discriminate against any race provided it does do so for a specific race and all people of that race are discriminated against. Otherwise the Commonwealth cannot discriminate and all laws must be throughout the commonwealth.
As such, if the Federal Parliament doesn’t desire an influx of a certain race it can legislate against that particular race, failing to do so the Federal Government has no power to discriminate against any particular refugee.
This is very important as otherwise pending the bias of the Government of the Day to any political race/religion we could be swamped with a particular race and in time suffer the consequences for this.
A blend is in my view the best option.
The Commonwealth is not allowed to determine refugees as to their religious beliefs as the Commonwealth is strictly prohibited by the Constitution to do so, as such persecution regardless of the reason of it is what is relevant.
The United Nations has no position to interfere with the constitutional provisions of the Commonwealth of Australia therefore neither can dictate which refugees are to be accepted or not.