The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Police who do we trust?

Police who do we trust?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. All
pale reading your posts here reminds me of those cowboy paper back books lively but not to be taken seriously.
How did you ever get the idea our ex police man poster was trying to uncover bad cops?
From what wild place did you get the idea I lied?
ICAC heard of it?
hours trying to get many to tell the truth about those rolled over trucks, you just do not talk about police thieving without reason.
And whistle blowers run last always so ICAC wasted its time.
I will leave every thread you use to insult and prod ,but want you to look at your written arm over the shoulder of o sung Wu.
It is your standard practice to do so, then use your new chum, the idea o sung Wu is investigating those he has so well defended here is rubbish.
Posted by Belly, Sunday, 22 June 2008 9:04:56 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Belly
You annoyed me by doing all the good coppers a great injustice. *Everybody at the police station was in on it!* How irresponsible is that.
Oh and remember you were told it comes from the top so what do you think ICAC and CMC etc and the likes are REALLY for? Dur.
Anybody who understands the system knows they are people you steer well clear of.
Dont tell me you tried to report a whole police station to ICAC.
Talk about a good Belly Laugh.

Dont try to bring the nice x policeman into your differences with me either.
Hes possibly wondering why I came back into this thread to take you up on your comment which would be fair enough.

Because you have for a long time posted the most nasty stupid comments to upset good people I just had to say something.

You had Antje in tears because shes not so good with English and Taryn was called awful things because she made a comment about aboriginals.
Mind you Taryn is actually part aboriginal. Neither post here any more .

Now your posting irresponsible posts about all coppers.
That makes a mockery of what good coopers have been through. Your childish ill informed unkind and I thought it was about time someone told you.
Now you can rush off to your mate as you call him kevin 07.
Mind you its possible your speaking the truth because Kevins not that bright eitherIMOP. Hes proved already to be a dishonerable liar.
Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Sunday, 22 June 2008 10:34:55 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi there BELLY...

I've read your last couple of posts carefully, regarding your assertions that all, most, or just a few coppers are, corrupt !

Without putting too fine a point on it, I've tried to explain that ALL organisitions, institutions, or ANY affiliation or group of human beings, who are gathered together for a common purpose, may be susceptible to corrupt behaviour of some sort.

Further, police are probably the MOST audited and scrutinized group of individuals in the workforce per se ! And, because police have to 'cop' so much crap from many,many different sources, they generally enjoy pretty reasonablly pay and benefits, together with, probably one of the best Superannuation Schemes available to the ordinary working man.

BELLY, think for a moment if you will. Do you actually believe a copper with a few years service in, would actually jeopardize ALL of the above benefits for a few ill-gotten 'goodies' ? Or, engage in systematic thievery - or commit some other indiscretion - like giving a mug a bit of 'biff' in the cells ?

By far, the large majority of police members would NEVER risk losing these advantages. Nor would they wish to destroy their own (or their families) good fame and character, for a flirtatious pilgrimage into the shadowy world of crime ?

As PALE&IF correctly suggested herein. If you have evidence that these events you've described, actually took place, then you should report it to police immediately. If not police, ANY related government department will pick-up the cudgel, and either deal with it themselves, or they'll pass it on to the correct and relevant authority.
Posted by o sung wu, Sunday, 22 June 2008 4:44:13 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I have to keep my words very much on track but o sung Wu if you served in NSW you know what I say is true.
In the 1980,and into the 90,s ICAC did get involved as I said.
Police did get removed from the force.
And I was indeed one of a great number interviewed by a chief inspector of police attacked to ICAC.
I did not sign a statement, and will not continue to dance close to the flame, it is true every word this thread has story's we must understand are also true why say it is not true?
this very day NSW press has a story about the highest level police corruption, police being the whistle blowers.
Pale you have little good will to trade on, seem to like insulting posters and look for fights.
I will avoid you by leaving the thread but have you noticed I no longer post in animal welfare threads?
You insure any one who differs with you is subject to insults and its not worth talking to you
o sung Wu I would stay and talk with you but history tells me it would not be wise reading my post history and pales would highlight a long term problem.
Posted by Belly, Sunday, 22 June 2008 5:16:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi all

Belly, it is a pity you have let PALE drive you away from animal welfare threads, that's just what they want - to discredit everyone who disagrees with them. Do return to us!

Cheers
Nicky
Posted by Nicky, Sunday, 22 June 2008 10:28:25 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I see this thread raging on,

I agree with o sung wu,

“Without putting too fine a point on it, I've tried to explain that ALL organisitions, institutions, or ANY affiliation or group of human beings, who are gathered together for a common purpose, may be susceptible to corrupt behaviour of some sort.”

We have seen it in diverse branches of the law, in all the professions and in the church. It will always happen because the organisations are of people and rely on the ethicacy of people.

The test for the system is

A to minimise the intake of people of dubious character (psychological profiles and historic behaviour can help there)

B to quarantine and expel those who do turn from or fail the standards required by the system, profession, association or authority.

I measure the success of an organisation on its prompt and urgent responsiveness to ‘B’ not the conduct of those who managed to sneak in through ‘A’

Like I said originally

“I recall we have had police commissioners end up in gaol. The system worked because it identified and punished them.”

Although we will always speculate on how prompt any action might be.
Posted by Col Rouge, Monday, 23 June 2008 11:55:34 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy