The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Cluster bombs banned.... great, but what about NANO-bombs?

Cluster bombs banned.... great, but what about NANO-bombs?

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All
I am appalled that Australia and a few other countries will still have cluster bombs in their arsenal after attending the meeting to ban them from the face of this earth. Besides that, an even worse disaster is on the carts for all, I said ALL living things on earth.
Would you believe with nano technology they can encapsule nano substances like pesticides, herbicides etc. and manipulate the capsules to open and release their substance with magnetics, sound, radio- frequencies or just by contact? Wouldn't you call that the cluster-bomb /artillery shell principal? For those who think this is utter garbage should go here:
http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/pdf_file/80

Or straight download from this trusted site:
http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/pdf_file/80
and look at page 12-13.
Posted by eftfnc, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 2:48:52 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Those two links are exactly the same.

A pesticide capsule won't blow your leg off (best case senario) 10 years down the track. Reasonably obvious difference there.

Cluster bombs are an effective weapon. Come up with something better and they'll stop using them. What's the point of these pesticide capsules.....a weapon?.
Posted by StG, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 3:03:29 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
GPS/computer guided intelligent schapnel would render aircraft obsolete.
Posted by Oliver, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 3:32:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"GPS/computer guided intelligent schapnel would render aircraft obsolete.
Posted by Oliver"


You will ALWAYS need air superiority. Smart weapons, although smart, aren't infallible. You can always shoot down guided, long range missiles. They haven't figured out evasion techniques for them yet. JDAM's and 'Dumb bombs' you can't shoot down...especially lots of them. By their very nature you need a delivery platform that can cancel their delivery at short notice. Such is the nature of battle these days.
Posted by StG, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 4:25:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"You will ALWAYS need air superiority." StG.

Agree. A point made by Westmooreland who wished an air rather than ground war in Vietnam.

But how does a plane or missle hit a swarm of a thousand nano-bots, guided by a satellite that knows your position? A million bees will bring down an elephant. Perhaps, useless, would have been a better word than, obsolete.
Posted by Oliver, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 5:05:56 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yeah, fair point. Well worth milling in the old noggin. Hundred year away from that?.
Posted by StG, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 5:52:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy