Here, Hebrew alphabetical writings on a seal acts as evidence of the OT narratives. There is an earlier find called House of David relic, which is a mere 250 years after Moses lived. The missing links are such historical writings from phonecia and sumer, which alligns with its space-time:

Old Testament 'proof': Royal seal discovered
Archaeologists unearth ancient relic from prince mentioned in Jeremiah

August 03, 2008
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

A team of archaeologists in Israel has unearthed what's believed to be the royal seal of an Old Testament prince.

The stamped engraving, known as a "bulla," was discovered earlier this year about 600 feet south of the Temple Mount, but is just now making headlines.

"How absolutely fantastic and special this find is can only be realized when you hold in your hand this magnificent one-centimeter piece of clay and know that it survived 2,600 years in the debris of the destruction, and came to us complete and in perfect condition," Mazar said.

The letters on the seal are in ancient Hebrew, and Mazar told WND the relic was recovered through a wet-sifting process. She says the method was learned after the "illegal excavations" by the Waqf, the Islamic custodians of the Temple Mount, who have been dumping debris in huge mounds.

This is actually the second recent discovery of an ancient bulla from the time of Jeremiah.

In 2005, Mazar found another seal with the name of Jehucal the son of Shelemiah, who is mentioned twice in the prophet's book. That artifact was found in a stone structure Mazar believes was part of King David's ancient palace.

She added, "It is not very often that such a discovery happens to archaeologists in which real figures of the past shake off the dust of history and so vividly revive the stories of the Bible."

Yes, it is reassuring, when once tentative knowledge is validated. Especially hard with the ancient past.

Been quite busy but do recall that when I started investigating "V" the Hebrews and the Pheonians did play ping-pong with "V" and "U". I will need to check but I think as earlier pictograms "V" was phonetically and visually related related to vase, and, "U", urn. Don't quote this, I need to make sure.

I saw a reference to Hadrian and Tarjan in my night-time reading [about Hadrian]related to the Jewish-Roman wars:

Regarding the Tarjan's invasion of [now] Iraq deployed against the Jews; "According to Cassius Dio, fifty fortresses and 1,000 villages were destroyed, 500,000 people had been killed or enslaved and [now] Palestine had been reduced to a wilderness of wolves and hyenas feeding on the corpses" [Neil Faulker, 2008].

Mention is also made of another Jewish Messiah, Bar-Kokba [Son of the Star], and this Messiah being supported by Rabbi Akiba

The V alphabet says a lot about ancient history, and the division which came after the European continent invaded the middle-east, namely with Greece and Rome. The V was absent in Greek, Roman [latin] and Arabic, but still embedded in the Hebrew - denoting this as a more ancient language, and thus a more authentic description of ancient history.

It appears the Islamic scriptures [Quran] would be heavily influenced by the latin, because it spells Abraham with a B [as with the latin], instead of the original hebrew AVraham [with a V], and also because the Quran condones one major portion of the gospels [Immacualte birth], while it rejects the most vital resurrection. And because the arabic writings first appeared well after the latin, in 350 CE.

The V alphabet says that the latin and arabic emerged in a different situation than the Hebrew, and that these writings would not have been privy to the ancient periods - having been written some 1300 to 1500 years later, and thus they have no historical veracity in measuring or re-defining the OT. The V becomes pivotal here - it signifies the OT as a document written in its narrated space-time, as opposed 1500 years later.