Hmmm ... a request for a *pHOENIx mANOUEVEREr* by the enemy?
An offering to the *Luv Poppets* will have 2 b considered.
...
Rather perhaps more than:

Learn another language, gain another *Soul*
Learn another language, & gain greater expression for thine own *Soul*

It goes to the cohesion of thought form and the consequential meaning potentials derived from different combinations of thought and feeling.

Instead of:
" ... and b4 he was *pREz* he was George Washington the WarrioR ... "

Rather the Australian "Socio/Medical" model and appeal to their very strong social and family ethos.

A gift, of sorts - *cOMPUTEr pOPPETs* I giv U *Cap'n Hooey*

http://www.liputan6.com/mediaplayer/?program=news&id=157329&m_id=708279

...Adam...

It states in relation to:
HOUSTON David Bruce
Possession 3.5g's "Dry Cannabis Leaf"
Excuse: In order to alleviate back pain.

Dear *Mrs Hooey*

I am not a legal expert, so pls consider taking what I say with a pinch of salt,
but *David's* excess consumption of marajuana came to the attention of "Men's Club" approximately 3 years ago from memory, resulting in a direction for me to refer *David* to:

http://www.drneilbeck.com/

which I did. However, the matter was left up to *David* as to whether or not he took *Men's Club* advice as he was not yet considered a candidate for the P.E.T. team. I assume that perhaps he did not? This is "good" in some ways as things currently are as it demostrates what the Drs refer to as a lack of insight. And it would appear that *David's* continued habit of "self medicating" extended all the way to that desire over-riding his common sense not to do this in a country with very harsh penalties like Indonesia.

My view, *David's* case is more medical than criminal.

Of course, given that the politicians are currently negotiating a "prisoner exchange" program, if U had an admissable testimony from a Dr like *Neil* I consider that this could well be in *David's* advantage. After all, they let the model girl go who claimed the much harder synthetic drug "ecstasy" that she was caught with was actually her anti-depressant medication.

And further, and again I am no expert, but *David* very likely has a mild leaning disability and this goes to potentially a succesfull arguement that this problem further imapired his judgement. I tutored *David* for many years during primary school as he was one of those that was always behind and I was always ahead, most especially in mathematics.

Anyway, notwithstanding the fact that I have been "advised" well away from making any direct representations on *David's* behalf, I thought the least I could do was to offer U another point of view for your deliberations in his interests.

I had no idea the articles section was your section as you put it.

Does this make it another labor party love fest site Belly.

But then, do we care?

Why not let him b buried in solitary for his crimes
(Not that that is what he is in for)
in a sensorially deprived environment.

Then, if anyone says anything about medication later, just blow pipe in a pill & bury the coroner's report in the "UnClassified" section of an under resourced, under staffed, give a ___k department, as is the case of at least one *BlakFella* that I know of.

...Adam...

Sorry should duck my head and run away, its the best thing to do, we all do it if walking on the street and some one shouts rude words.
Or seems to be lost in a world of their own, we walk away run sometimes.
The thread is dead our site owner says it is an open forum and he owns it, yes he does and sometimes not rare but often it is going to be used by some we run away from.
It can not be any other way, freedom of speech is worth while.
Last post for me in this thread but can any reasonable person, tell me that you thought I claimed personal ownership of the articles section?
A J Breton? run away Belly you can do nothing here.
But like 100 murdered threads just maybe we should all be concerned, are we served by a conservative movement that most likely is about to change leadership but not directions.
And that true open debate on politics is so very hard in a forum that is also about politics.

"Coalition need to realize that people matter more than Corporations"
(Foxy)

"I am 'ALP' to the core" (Belly)

"Oppositions look for the chink..and exploit it" (Corri)

"time to get on with their job as an effective opposition to keep the government on track and govern FOR Australians instead of corporations."

There seems to be an unspoken assumption here that when the ALP were in opposition, they did not do the very things everyone is mentioning..except not for 'corporations'.. rather.. 'workers' (which of course impacts on the competitiveness and viability of 'corporations'.

The conservative think tank should be thinking how to represent the broad cross section of Australians both corporate and worker. But do leapords change their spots? Will the ALP when next in opposition seek to represent other than organized 'Labor'- as per its name?

Our democratic system is driven primarily by 'me'ism... selfishness.. greed.. and I suspect the higher up the party peck order one goes, and the more one is exposed to, the more this will become apparent on both sides of politics. Advertizing deals.. Consultancy deals...etc etc..

Fill in the blanks "......is not 'of' this world" :)