The Forum > General Discussion > Spiritual or Religious or Both?
Spiritual or Religious or Both?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Other people may be spiritual they believe we are all inter-connected, part of nature.
Some people are both spiritual and religious, combining their interpretation of their holy books with an understanding that not everyone is the same, but that we are all valid living beings under a supreme deity.
Anyone can be religious, but that does not mean they are spiritual.
Being spiritual requires self-knowledge and accountability for one’s actions.
Religion (with the exception of Buddhism) places the onus on a deity – serving the deity, imagining what this deity wants them to do, which could be good; helping the poor, or very bad; suicide bombing.
The spiritual person doesn’t require a ‘leader’ or even a ‘congregation’ – they simply are.
The religious person adheres to a strict hierarchy, god at the zenith, the more enlightened place women and men and nature together under god, the less enlightened place man followed by woman and dominion over nature.
The above is just my definition. There are, no doubt, other better alternatives.
Perhaps, the gentle OLO contributor would like reflect on what makes them spiritual or religious or both or maybe not any of the above.