Foxy
ABC knows this man as Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi, not as Sheikh Haron. Ayatollah Boroujerdi a while after his interview with ABC has legally changed his name. Ayatollah Boroujerdi has had interview with other Radios as well but you can't find it through Google search. A newspaper in London published a report about Ayatollah Boroujerdi with his photo on front page few years ago. I have been in a Hall in Granvile in Sydney when he gave a speech to few hudreds people. That speech has been recorded.

Ginx
You are right. There is no evidence to show that Sheikh Haron is Boroujerdi except the Siekh's website which claims him to be. So I think Sheikh Haron must prove that he is the same Manteghi Boroujerdi. Probaly he is , if not so why doesn't Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi complain from Sheikh Haron for using his identity?
Whether Sheikh Haron is Manteghi Boroujerdi or not, he as a Muslim or Christian or Jewish or Atheist (it doesn't make difference) has claimed that David might be in danger, so tell me your opinion about it, Ginx.

If David was following an idiologic thinking pattern by training in muslim camps which were not backed by a foreign countries army, he should be safe.The question whether he would be classified a "mercenary" (as the present occupiers in Iraq are) could put him in danger.

ALJAZEERA_OZ,

NO ONE can say for sure who is or is not in danger. If you go to David's site, you will see that NO letter has been sent by 'Haron'.
NO media in SA have made ANY mention of danger to DH;- we all know the media well enough; this is newsworthy! NOTHING has been seen electronic or print.

ANY possible threat has been conveyed by 'Haron' (yes, I believe he's fake), allegedly by a letter.

There is no trace of any letter.

David Hicks was considered, even by other detainees, as 'small fry'.
The only conceivable danger that I could see for him is based on what he witnessed when he was sold to the 'allies', and everything he witnessed thereafter.

But the Bush Administration has already acted to immune itself from any human rights abuse charges.

I am sceptical in the absence of a letter from a so-called Sheik.

Hey Ozzie
According to the 6 oclock news David Hicks had a visitor- Dick Smith of the Dick Smith chain of stores Dick Smith has stated most angrily that David was only there to help people.?
Well its too much for me as plenty need help here including his own kids.

Anyway hes saying he knows more than the police after one meeting with him
I wonder if he has any idea how some of these people can spin a yarn
So everyone I think David is safe and i think its safe to say that if Smith is watching out for him.
Just thought you mayall like to know. by Geeif there is a story behind this it wont look good for US and it will be a big one
Cheers all.

So the conclusion for this thread is
David is not in danger,
am I right?

P- Dox
As a bank