The Forum > General Discussion > Is David in danger?
Is David in danger?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
Posted by P_Dox, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 9:44:49 AM
| |
his sanity is certainly in danger. the whole world knows what the cia does, if they want to know. hicks has nothing new to add, and is a confessed criminal, so nothing he says need be credited anyway.
the only way he can be troublesome is by being shot by someone in the pay of the cia. this would stir a little bit of fuss. so no. if he doesn't kill himself, if he doesn't go insane, he's in no danger. of course, insurance and employment will be a problem for the rest of his life, and he might despise the people who left him to rot in a foreign jail, but hey, everyone's got some problem, right? Posted by DEMOS, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 1:37:34 PM
| |
As opposed to the other people held at G-bay?.
Any mysterious disappearances reported?. If those agenda driven religous frootloops (christian as well) told me the sky was blue, I'd stick my head out the door to double check. Posted by StG, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 3:12:26 PM
| |
Is this the same (busy little beaver) Sheikh Haron - who's a fraud?
Who's neither a Sheikh nor a Muslim ... even his name isn't real. He made all these claims about sending letters to the PM et cetera. Check him out on the net. And you'll see David is quite safe - at least from the Sheikh... Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 3:36:04 PM
| |
P- Dox
I am surprised you would bother spreading this rubbish and even more so that olo approved it. Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 4:26:43 PM
| |
The great global plan of Islam includes stirring up as much dissension wherever they can. Even little stirrings have value to the great plan. I think David's fine or he wouldnt have made it home. I think the CIA has greater concerns. If I was them, it would be China and the quiet two-way between China and Russia about the overthrow of the US. I wish David well actually. God bless him. He always seemed to me to be a boy out for adventure that ended up with a bad crowd. How often has that happened to youth?
Posted by Gibo, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 4:59:32 PM
| |
Sure After all all he did was meet with Bin larden at least twenty times and describe him as a "really nice guy"
BTW he denounced Islam according to reports. Well I think he first did but withdrew that postion later only to do the same thing again. Seems to me hes not a Muslim when in custody of the opposition but is when he isnt. Can anybody tell the tax payers what he cost us for the private plane to bring this person back to our country and why he isnt being made reasonsible for that bill Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 5:18:13 PM
| |
He is a traitor! And should be taken down the backyard and shot! He was born here and if his mind is in that frame of thought, we can do well without that. Someone here got it right, one silly boys thoughts, embarrassed us all. I guess I should think about that myself. LOL. Is David in danger? Who cares! We are all responsible for our actions, and if we look at our youth, again! nothing is going to change soon.
Thanks David, I hope you enjoyed your experience. Maybe in your next life you do more with your existence. I see a different world to most, but every time I make a comment, I just draw my self into the pathetic world of small mindlessness. People! There are bigger fish too fry. Freedom of speech! Don't you just love it. Posted by evolution, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 8:32:21 PM
| |
Interesting link P_Dox. Now tell us what your REAL motivation is?
Posted by Ginx, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 8:53:37 PM
| |
The only danger David faces is himself.
He needs to remembers that D.H. can stands for, David Hicks – NOT , Die Hard. If he goes running off on another ‘Grand Tour’ of the continent, we’ll all see that D.H. really stands for , D1ck Head. Posted by Horus, Thursday, 24 January 2008 4:32:05 AM
| |
DEMOS
Your comment regarding CIA has made me concerned. Do you really think that CIA is going to kill David Hicks before he reveals any information? Foxy You say Sheikh Haron is neither a Sheikh nor a Muslim. ABC Radio says that he is a Muslim and is Ayatollah. I don't know I should believe you or ABC Radio. If you have more information about him please let us know, or contact news.com.au. They have given a number for SMS/MMS and an Email, and they have requested people to contact news.com.au if they have more information. Please let them and us know about his religion. http://austrolabe.com/2008/01/21/who-is-sheikh-haron/#comments http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22874009-2,00.html?from=mostpop People Against Live Export You are usually polite on the forum. I am surprised you said "rubbish". It is not rubbish, it is an important topic about the safety of an Australian citizen. The life of every aussie is important whether is Christian or Muslim or ... This is one of the reasons olo has approved it. Secondly it is freedom of expression, isn't it? Ginx I have no idea. I am confused. Everyone says something different. ABC Radio says Sheikh Haron exists and is Muslim. Foxy says he is not Muslim. I don't know who should I believe? Posted by P_Dox, Thursday, 24 January 2008 3:56:49 PM
| |
I would suggest that you look up the following site:
http://austrolabe.com/2007/12/06/the-fake-sheikh-haron/ or alternatively ask "Google" the question, "Who is Sheikh Haron?" then judge for yourself... Posted by Foxy, Thursday, 24 January 2008 6:01:18 PM
| |
Good link Foxy.
P_Dox, David Hicks has had NO letter from this fake fakir.Truly. I still question your motivation for this. IF Hicks was in danger from the CIA he would have met with an 'accident' in G/mo. Posted by Ginx, Thursday, 24 January 2008 11:32:07 PM
| |
Foxy
I have given the link for the same site, Austrolable. Austrolable published two articles and claimed that Sheikh Haron was fake. Later the third article was published to correct the past mistakes and they explained that Sheikh Haron is Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi. They have also given a link of ABC Radio's interview with him. Please check the link. Also newspaper The Australian published an article saying "MYSTERIOUS cleric" on 6 December 2007,but later on 28 December they pulished an article to correct it. They wrote: The Australian wrongly accused him as Mysterious Imam. Foxy I have a friend who is Muslim and he follows all these carefully and is interested to know what will be the next. But still if you have more imformation about Sheikh Haron, please do not to hesitate to sms the number that news.com.au has announced it for Sheikh Haron or contact The Australian. By the way the topic of this thread is David Hicks, not Sheikh Haron, so please lets talk about the topic. Thank you. http://austrolabe.com/2008/01/21/who-is-sheikh-haron/ Posted by P_Dox, Thursday, 24 January 2008 11:35:21 PM
| |
You were the one that brought up the topic of Sheikh Haron,
as part of this thread and I responded to it. I contacted the ABC - they are familiar with other Muslim clerics - but not the one called - "Haron." Nobody in the Muslim community knows can confirm who this man is. I'm more than happy to leave this subject alone - as I feel that to comment further - would be an insult to our intelligence. Posted by Foxy, Friday, 25 January 2008 9:50:30 AM
| |
P - Dox
I am sorry If you are dissapointed by us. Normally We dont care too much if we get people off side because we have a job to do. However you have always been one of my personal favouite posters. I dont always comment on the post because we tend to get chased out. People just dont understand that exporting animals alive from Oz really does cross into everything from jobs trade health climate Animal Welfare etc I am surprised you opended this post TBRO. I mean of all the things we Aussies have to worry about I just cant see David[ is that his name this week?] being a huge problem. You say he was just a silly boy looking for fun. He was a man who wrote his parents telling them he wanted to fight for Islam. He left two kids here. I want the air costs paid by him and him alone so somebody had best give him a job. Then he can pay all the legal costs he caused the tax payers. Money that could have been spent on hospitals for our sick and elderly. Hes not saying sorry I was young and sily. Hes saying he met with Bin Lardin twenty times or more who he describes as a really nice bloke. Is David In Danger you ask? Only If I get hold of him by the looks of it P-Dox When hes good and ready he will leave his parents and shame them by returning to his buddy Bin Larden where he will probably get made a imortal. No P-Dox David isnt in any danger what so ever. He has friends in low places.[ Usually the best survival of all] and we the suckers and tax payers are left to pick up his bill. I prefer to give my time to the victims and familes of the bali Bombers and the world trade centers as well as the most innocent= our Animals. Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Friday, 25 January 2008 10:31:09 AM
| |
P-Dox I am one of the 'friends in low places' that David has.
I've done a little bit of research on the so-called Sheik. The only 'interview' done with this fellow was when he was in a tent on the steps of Parl/House in 2001! Any link that you provide to validate his existence by showing that he is Manteghi Boroujerdi, only serves to prove that there may well be a MB, BUT;- there is no evidence to suggest that HE is HarOOn or HarOUn. I have to admit though, that 'Sheik Haron' is making a brilliant job of this pretence! Posted by Ginx, Friday, 25 January 2008 3:17:38 PM
| |
We can live in hope, I suppose.
Posted by Hasbeen, Friday, 25 January 2008 3:25:43 PM
| |
Foxy
ABC knows this man as Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi, not as Sheikh Haron. Ayatollah Boroujerdi a while after his interview with ABC has legally changed his name. Ayatollah Boroujerdi has had interview with other Radios as well but you can't find it through Google search. A newspaper in London published a report about Ayatollah Boroujerdi with his photo on front page few years ago. I have been in a Hall in Granvile in Sydney when he gave a speech to few hudreds people. That speech has been recorded. Ginx You are right. There is no evidence to show that Sheikh Haron is Boroujerdi except the Siekh's website which claims him to be. So I think Sheikh Haron must prove that he is the same Manteghi Boroujerdi. Probaly he is , if not so why doesn't Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi complain from Sheikh Haron for using his identity? Whether Sheikh Haron is Manteghi Boroujerdi or not, he as a Muslim or Christian or Jewish or Atheist (it doesn't make difference) has claimed that David might be in danger, so tell me your opinion about it, Ginx. Posted by ALJAZEERA_OZ, Monday, 28 January 2008 12:38:11 AM
| |
If David was following an idiologic thinking pattern by training in muslim camps which were not backed by a foreign countries army, he should be safe.The question whether he would be classified a "mercenary" (as the present occupiers in Iraq are) could put him in danger.
Posted by eftfnc, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 4:08:26 PM
| |
ALJAZEERA_OZ,
NO ONE can say for sure who is or is not in danger. If you go to David's site, you will see that NO letter has been sent by 'Haron'. NO media in SA have made ANY mention of danger to DH;- we all know the media well enough; this is newsworthy! NOTHING has been seen electronic or print. ANY possible threat has been conveyed by 'Haron' (yes, I believe he's fake), allegedly by a letter. There is no trace of any letter. David Hicks was considered, even by other detainees, as 'small fry'. The only conceivable danger that I could see for him is based on what he witnessed when he was sold to the 'allies', and everything he witnessed thereafter. But the Bush Administration has already acted to immune itself from any human rights abuse charges. I am sceptical in the absence of a letter from a so-called Sheik. Posted by Ginx, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 8:36:37 PM
| |
Hey Ozzie
According to the 6 oclock news David Hicks had a visitor- Dick Smith of the Dick Smith chain of stores Dick Smith has stated most angrily that David was only there to help people.? Well its too much for me as plenty need help here including his own kids. Anyway hes saying he knows more than the police after one meeting with him I wonder if he has any idea how some of these people can spin a yarn So everyone I think David is safe and i think its safe to say that if Smith is watching out for him. Just thought you mayall like to know. by Geeif there is a story behind this it wont look good for US and it will be a big one Cheers all. Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Monday, 4 February 2008 6:22:19 PM
| |
So the conclusion for this thread is
David is not in danger, am I right? Posted by P_Dox, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 8:50:32 PM
| |
P- Dox
As a bank Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 8:58:07 PM
|
http://www.sheikhharon.com/announcements.html
Do you really think David is in danger?