tax fraud

I would like to sue my former employer for 'tax fraud".

Actually i introduced my ex-boss to set up a chinese massage shop at sunshine plaza in sunshine coast. In exchange, when i quite the job he would provide me with a job reference letter by saying i did marketing xysis and well structured promotional strategy (which i did in deep).

Although he has 3 other massage shop in brisbane, i realize most of my employee never pay tax or pay a little amount of tax. Of coz he does pay tax but cheating on tax as well.

When the first day we open our shop at sunshine plaza (last sept), on the employee list which he regestered, he just put one staff onto the list (whom quite the job on nov..

Wiz please let me explain, in truth I do not think you understood my post.
I too, we are a minority, do not mind paying more tax if it gets a better life for those who must live on Social Security.
I would want every dollar saved from controlling fraud to be returned to the pool, not general funds.
Let us together look at what I have said, to do under the table deals as in post one is a crime, committed both by the boss and the worker.
Three times a crime, the wages paid is less than the minimum wage as I understand it.
The outcomes of this crime are.
1 no real job exists because of it.
2 the boss has cheated every one including his honest opposition.
3 while the worker is making some illegal money her actions are keeping her down ,she would be better of with a job not for a few dollars being used like a slave.
Not every one on social security is a victim hard as some find it some do not want to work ever, some do work in the cash economy and get social security.
I kid you not I would give 20% more of my total income to end poverty, if it like was for the real poor not those who use the system.

with the greatest of respect, it seems you are being taken in by the [failed] devices of the departed Howard mob, ie the red herrings to put you off the real fraud

Remember the "sting" on lawyers paying no tax on million dollar incomes - AG Williams said he would look into the loophole [maintenance trusts] but Howard got rid of him and gave us AG Ruddock

I devote a whole chapter to "Centrelink Matters" in my book and not one word re the Dole

see http://www.ablokesguide.com

Doc you march into the thread throw a far different issue on the table, run an add for your book and smugly wander of.
I can see a point proved here. the cleaner may know more about the issue than the teacher.
I do truly get a grin out of the Howard comparison, every day! yes I still can not let it go! I grin in joy at his defeat.
Come down from those ivory towers please, to think some find it difficult to see some who receive Social Security commit fraud.
Or the this fraud is just as wrong as any theft.
The truth is we as a nation must one day look again at the whole issue.
My belief is we should pay far more attention to who gets what, it will be swimming against a very fast tide but if we do truly try we can pay much more to many less.
Some who now work part time and collect the SS are not nice victims but some will not see it.
The truly unhappy life of those who have no choice must be made better but we do need to confront the difference .

"Come down from those ivory towers please, to think some find it difficult to see some who receive Social Security commit fraud.
Or the this fraud is just as wrong as any theft........

........Some who now work part time and collect the SS are not nice victims but some will not see it." (Quote:Belly)~

_________________

Now you are starting to annoy me. Can you not see that such criticism can be equally leveled at you?

YOU Belly, ARE thoroughly fixated on 'Social Security Fraud' to the exclusion of the MASSIVE rorting of the system at the other end of the money tree.

I am irritated by your bland assertion: 'come down from those ivory towers/some will not see it..'.Your comments could quite validly be applied to you!
Comments that are derogatory because others have pointed out that BY FAR the greatest drain on the system comes from the top. BY FAR!!

To extrapolate statements made about corporate fraud as being blind to welfare fraud is ludicrous!

Don't attempt to tell me what I can and can't see, you have a thread about courtesy in posting. How about accepting that others disagree with you rather than talking down to them

yes I agree, and only reason I mentioned lawyers paying no tax and not the massive rorting of family law is because I have already spent 10 years detecting and reporting that side in my book

that is why I mentioned the book

but the biggest recent fraud was the 60 billion by Costello, and I have documented that one too at UTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLRg1U4h-2Y

don't say I did not warn everyone