BOAZ, Mate I didnt say it wasnt.

Sub saharan blacks are generally muslim or have intellect that will make them vastly more prone to violence than say um us.

I got no problem with Chinese or SE Asians, they are smarter than us so at least the skilled ones are less likely to be part of the social welfare cycle and the non muslim ones seem to be content with killing each other and not us.

This country is to good to be selling it out like a $2 whore in a knock shop to a bunch of apes.

Dont tell me your turning into a bleeding heart BD, what have you changed sides since the election?

Im just telling it the way it is, for everyone of you hand wringing socialist scumbags out there, there are at least one of us callious uncaring ninties types. You all must hate my guts.

Er, Boazy...

"EXAMPLE. Australian law says you cannot discriminate against people in business or services based on religion. But Aussies are regularly discriminated by Muslim taxi drivers if they are:
a) Carrying alchohol (something you are partial to)
b) Guide dogs."

Evidence please. I thought that particular dog-whistle was consigned to redneck mythology ages ago.

I object to you disingenuously claiming my support for your pusilanimous cause. However, now that you've admitted that the only valid criterion for acceptance of bona fide refugees is willingness to abide by Australian law, you seem to have shot yourself in the foot somewhat.

I also object to this:

"..the whole of Sudan can be polarized by calling a Teddy bear 'mohammad'...... "

Are you aware that something like half of Sudan isn't Muslim? You know, that persecuted proportion from which comes the bulk of Sudanese refugees like those who end up in Australia. Your linking of Sudan as an example of Muslim extremism to this discussion only reinforces the legitimacy of the refugee status of Sudanese refugees.

But that isn't what you intended, is it? You're such a reprehensible goose.

P.S. I see the village idiot's back in town. Damn that deinstitutionalisation policy.

SCOTTY

Thank you for your comic dissertation on race and intelligence. However, I think you wanted to tell us more about yourself than about 'sub-saharan blacks' and violence or 'smarter than us' (leave me out of that thanks) Chinese or SE Asians.

I must say I got confused with your contradictory claims:

(a) "This country is to good to be selling it out like a $2 whore in a knock shop to a bunch of apes." and

(b) "...for everyone of you hand wringing socialist scumbags out there, there are at least one of us callious uncaring ninties types."

Is the country too good; or is it full of socialist scumbags and an equal number of 'callious uncaring ninties types'?

You conclude: "You all must hate my guts." No, not at all SCOTTY. But your spelling and logic are a bit of a worry.

Scotty.. no mate.. I'm not a 'bleeding heart' in the silly unthinking sense.. My heart does bleed for the genuine people in genuine need.(as opposed to self manufactured need by deliberately spitting on our laws, or placing themselves in 'sympathy' situations they never needed to)

CJ.. it's not me who shot in the foot..its u :) "pusilanimous"? r u serious.... "PUSILANIMOUS" how many thesaurus's did you have to wade through to come up with THAT gem :)?
You spelt it incrorrectly too.. smart alek... its PusiLLanimous"
and the meaning ?

"Lacking in courage and resolution; contemptibly fearful; cowardly."

I can't quite see the connection.. "cowardly" ? I'm pretty up front with what I say. If you want to have a coffee some time I'll be as upfront in person as via here.

Anyway...back to topic.. you do agree with my position, because you expressed it. *thanx* :) I see hope there.

EVIDENCE?
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,,20544559-661,00.html
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21782513-5001021,00.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=408912&in_page_id=1770
http://www.aussiemuslims.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=97&Itemid=45

>>Muslim taxi drivers are refusing to transport guide dogs and passengers carrying alcohol. At least 20 blind Melburnians have lodged discrimination complaints with the Victorian Taxi directorate, New Limited reports.<<

That last quote is from a 'redneck muslim' site... shock horror..they admit it themselves.
Dont' you hate it when, with all your 'education' .. you can't spell and ur plain wrong? :)

*pusilanimous* ? :) the mind truly boggles.

No big offense meant (perhaps a tiny bit?)... but I am stirring you.

Another not-so-veiled religious assault under the guise of social commentary from the indefatigable BOAZ_David.

While I don’t doubt their veracity, some of these taxi sources are actually 12 months old, one was a single incident from overseas and the latest actually said the incidence of banning dogs was “rare”.

In any case provisions to deal with such matters already exist so why make it seem like some brand new phenomenon that has suddenly appeared that we all have to deal with.

If they are “spitting on our laws” then they will pay the penalty – just as I would if I were caught speeding. It’s not as if they are requesting some sort of dispensation on religious grounds.

Why also the need to continually stress the differences between peoples and not appreciate the similarities? Because it doesn’t suit the agenda or is it a fundamental need to assert some sort of moral superiority? If you can't build yourself up, then drag others down?

Instead of bleating about how we could be wiped out as a nation by the wearing of headscarves or whatever, why not demonstrate how our culture is already being virtually obliterated by American culture without even a whimper?

The typical pattern is - if it’s potentially negative it’s got be specifically about “Muslim” taxi drivers but if the story was about generic taxi drivers who refuse to pick up drunks or aboriginals, they wouldn’t be referred to as “Christian taxi drivers”. Likewise, it’s the “Muslim gang” that riots but never the “Christian army” that bombs civilians.

By the way it’s traditionally called “smart alec” or “smart aleck” - not smart alek.

I’ll overlook the “incrorrectly” as an example of typing-in-tongues, an affliction to which I am also prone.

Thanks wobbles. Clearly this is just another case of Boazy dog-whistling.

And Boazy, 'pusillanimous' is just a good old English word that I plucked from the recesses of my vocabulary. Unusual perhaps, but those of us who read more than one book are likely to have encountered it. I thought you were a passionate supporter of speaking English in Australia?

The sense in which I used 'pusillanimous' is that of 'contemptibly fearful' - referring of course to your Islamophobia. Thanks for pointing out the typo, but as wobbles has indicated you made two yourself in the same sentence.

Your attempt to revive an old dog-whistle doesn't assist your pusillanimous cause. Those few Muslim taxi drivers who broke those regulations some time ago have either been dealt with under complaints procedures or are no longer driving taxis. In any case, it was hardly an example of "spitting on our laws", was it?

So, if bona fide refugees are willing to abide by Australian laws, would you agree that they should be accepted into our refugee program?