The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > please do this survey on carbon taxes

please do this survey on carbon taxes

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
Please take a few moments to fill out this survey. It is run by a new party - cnservatives for climate and environment:

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=8DxFU51ealvnvcT0YQiC_2fA_3d_3d

3. Would you be happy to pay a carbon price penalty for fossil fuel energy sources ?
E.g. $50/tonne CO2 price would see petrol up 12c/litre and coal fired electricity up around 5c/kWh.
(The Nobel Prize winning IPCC's report shows around 45% global mitigation potential by 2030 at $50USD/tonne CO2)

4. Even a tax or trading scheme at $50/tonne would collect almost as much revenue as the GST. How would you like to see it spent ?

More info:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1168051896/42#42

http://www.ozpolitic.com/green-tax-shift/green-tax-shift.html
Posted by freediver, Friday, 2 November 2007 11:33:28 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
there's no point in a carbon tax unless the money is spent providing alternatives. no australian politician can be trusted to do this, as the structure of political society does not allow precise supervision or accountability.

perhaps a better approach is to extract a resource price from mining companies. they are, after all, making a profit from 'the commons', leaving a hole where there used to be a valuable resource not of their making.
Posted by DEMOS, Sunday, 4 November 2007 9:22:29 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Actually no, the tax serves a purpose even if the income is used to reduce income tax or GST or something like that. The increase in price alone will significantly reduce emissions. This is the best way to achieve fast reductions with little impact on the economy.

The fact that politicians can't be trusted is kind of a moot point. You could make the same argument about any change. It is the public that is u;ltimately responsible. Politicians will only get away with what the public allows them to.
Posted by freediver, Sunday, 4 November 2007 2:56:45 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Not much point, human caused global warming is no longer the issue.
With world oil, gas and coal either about to start depleting, or depleting
in the next 10 years, (coal 2025 to 2030) there will not be the CO2
to worry about.

We have a much more serious problem;
The tacit agreement of politicians to not mention peak oil.
Reminds me of Faulty Towers "Don't mention the war".
Oil at almost $US100 a barrel.
Australia 40% depleted.

Those carrying on about human caused global warming have missed the boat.
It is no longer the major problem.
I know to even say this is like swearing in church but face it.
Posted by Bazz, Monday, 5 November 2007 11:01:13 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
You don't actually believe that do you? At most we have used half the available oil, and far less of the coal, which is a bigger problem. We've hardly begun on the tar sands. This is not the time to say 'OK, we're only going to put out 5 times as much as we have so before it runs out, so lets not worry about it.' If what you say is true, it would be a good thing. But it isn't.
Posted by freediver, Monday, 5 November 2007 4:30:59 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hello Freediver said,
>You don't actually believe that do you? At most we have used half the
>available oil, and far less of the coal, which is a bigger problem.

Sorry, but coal was presumed by everybody to have years of reserves.
The German Energy Watch group found that there had been no review for
40 years I think it was. That was recently confirmed.
Oil depletion may well have already started.

> We've hardly begun on the tar sands.
ERoEI, and it can't be ramped up faster than depletion. Also problem
with gas availability to heat the tar and pollution.

> This is not the time to say 'OK, we're only going to put out 5 times
>as much as we have so before it runs out, so lets not worry about it.'

Isn't it ? Well the Hydrocarbon group at Uppsala thinks that the
IPCC studies need looking at because of this problem.

> If what you say is true, it would be a good thing. But it isn't.
Well, we will have to wait until it sinks in to the GW pushers but at
present it is against their religion, so we await prophet Gore to speak.
=
NB what I have said applies to world production, not Australia.
In Australia oil depletion is already by 40 percent.
We have gas in plenty, but will sell it to China & Japan until we have
none to use ourselves.
Likewise with China, someone in the Chinese government said they will
use all their coal and then use ours. They are now a coal importer.
What price is oil today ?
Posted by Bazz, Monday, 5 November 2007 6:26:23 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy