Something that was thought to have died and been buried over 50 years ago, the White Australia Policy, has been resurrected, thanks to Pauline Hanson. In what is fast becoming an infamous interview with the convicted UK felon and far-right activist Tommy Robinson, Hanson suggested without evidence migrants came to Australia "purely for the welfare system". She blames this on the ending of the White Australia Policy. In the same interview Hanson claimed it was "quite known" that Muslims in Australia were prominent among people "ripping off" the NDIS. Senator Hanson said all the problems "started" in 1973 when former prime minister Gough Whitlam "opened up Australia, and got rid of the White Australia policy".

Should there be a return to this outdated policy, and are migrants (and Aboriginals), the cause of all of Australia's economic and social problems.

With the extreme right of politics ratcheting up its anti-Muslim, anti-migrant hysteria, the Albanese government has released its timely response to Aftab Malik's Islamophobia Report, accepting 35 of the 54 recommendations, while still considering others. Multicultural Affairs Minister Anne Aly, who is Australia's first female Muslim federal parliamentarian, said the government's responses go to "addressing some of the most significant manifestations of Islamophobia". Hopefully there will be a concerted effort to combat the lies and misinformation being peddled by the likes of Hanson and co about Muslims, and other ethnic minorities in Australia.

All the word twisting doesn't help solve the problem of incompatible migrants. Post WW2 has proven that migrants from all groups & race can achieve a workable society as long as they have the same goal, create a better life by shedding the cultural part that is incompatible with the Western values. Hypocritical racist can not refrain from stirring the pot & accusing good migrants of being racist i.e. White Australia policy ! Australia started as a Western Nation & when incompatible migrants keep promoting their thousand year old quest to take over this nation than they're clearly incompatible ! Only racists will bleat racism when there isn't any !

Hi Indy,

How do you define "incompatible migrants"? Are they incompatible because they speak a different language to you, dress differently, eat different foods etc. I see no problem with people coming here simply for a better life, regardless of differences in culture, provided these differences are benign, which for 99.9% of migrants most certainly are. If you are olive skinned, speaking a strange language, come to Australia and you want to wear a toga, and worship the god Jupiter, and eat ostrich brains, I don't care. If you want to to feed people to lions on a Saturday afternoon at the MCG, I'm going to oppose that cultural practice as incompatible. It's a matter of acceptance and balance, I would be willing to come around to your "domus" and partake of the ostrich brains, although I did hear they are high in cholesterol.

You say you are a migrant, what was your experience coming to Australia, I assume you arrived post 1966 when the Holt Coalition government repealed the laws around the White Australia Policy, allowing for mixed migration.

incompatible
adjective
1 she and McBride are totally incompatible: unsuited, mismatched, ill-matched, poles apart, worlds apart, like day and night; ill-assorted; British like chalk and cheese. ANTONYMS well matched, suited
2 incompatible economic objectives: irreconcilable, conflicting, opposed, opposite, contradictory, antagonistic, antipathetic; clashing, inharmonious, discordant; mutually exclusive. ANTONYMS compatible; complementary
3 his theory was incompatible with that of his predecessor: inconsistent with, at odds with, out of keeping with, different to, differing from, divergent from, at variance with, incongruous with, inconsonant with, contrary to, in conflict with, in opposition to, diametrically opposed to, counter to, not in accord with, irreconcilable with, not able to be reconciled with, alien to; rare repugnant to, oppugnant to. ANTONYMS consistent
People who desire other peoples' demise !

Hanson didn't and doesn't advocate the return of the White Australia Policy. That's just another in the long line of leftist myths that Paul has fallen for.

What she did say was that the current problems with Australian culture began when the WAP ended, (Incidentally she made the same mistake as other leftists make in crediting Whitlam with ending it. In fact it was unwound by a series of Liberal governments over the 1960's culminating in the reforms instituted by the Holt government. Whitlam merely got rid of the some of the legislation that was, by then, already ignored).

What Hanson (and now a plurality of Australian society) wants is to institute policies that (1) reduces the numbers people allowed into the country and (2) ensure that those who come have a culture that is compatible with Australia's liberal democratic values

" the Albanese government has released its timely response to Aftab Malik's Islamophobia Report"....

“Islamophobia: a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons.”
— Christopher Hitchens

would be a real shame to miss out on the Di Li's, the Gina Rhinehart's and the likes of Tony and Vince Galati's. On the other hand the Bondi killers, the grooming gangs, the perpetual haters and victims in this nation are usually leftist or servants of facist ideology (Islam). The likes of Paul are either pig headed ignorant or just the typical indoctrinated leftist who love to misrepresent and play on words. Not sure what he does not understand about Hamas terrorist and isis brides but I am sure he will deflect as socialist grubs do.

Hi Trumpster,

"leftists make in crediting Whitlam with ending it. In fact it was unwound by a series of Liberal governments over the 1960's culminating in the reforms instituted by the Holt government."

I posted before that; "1966 when the Holt Coalition government repealed the laws around the White Australia Policy, allowing for mixed migration."

Please try to keep up.

Are there parallels with what the antisemitic Joseph Goebbels said about Jews, and what Islamophobic's are saying today about Muslims. Goebbels linked Bolshevism with international Jewry and warned Germans of an alleged Jewish conspiracy to destroy western civilisation. The Lovely Pauline said there was no such thing as a good Muslim. There are right wing ratbags who warn Australians, claiming there is a link between Islam and Marxism, they also claim there is an international Islamic conspiracy to destroy western civilisation, certainly sounds familiar.

Don't know about your folk hero Christopher Hitchens. He seems to be some kind of screwed up right wing radical, who believed Iraq was responsible for 9/11. Got that wrong, maybe he also got it wrong about Islamophobia. I don't think fascists created the word Islamophobia, but they certainly suffer from it.

"Are there parallels with what the antisemitic Joseph Goebbels said about Jews, and what Islamophobic's are saying today about Muslims. "

Since there are no Islamophobes, your question is unanswerable.
Additionally, Goebbels was racist against Jews. But Islam isn't a race.

0 for 2.

"[Christopher Hitchens] who believed Iraq was responsible for 9/11."

False. As in not even close to true.

0 for 3

Hi Trumpster,

"Since there are no Islamophobes" When Pauline Hanson said; "how can you tell me there are good Muslims?" during a February 2026 interview on Sky News. In March 2026, the Australian Senate passed a motion formally censuring Senator Hanson for the remark. If were talking about one or two, or even a million, but to claim 2 billion are all bad, based on their religious beliefs indicates a phobia, Islamophobia.

Then there is that old chestnut that rednecks use; "Islam isn't a race" so I can't be racists when I hate them because of their religion. Your cop out is a technical definition, and Islamophobes can claim they are just bigots. Is that what they are? Bigots.

Again Paul, you don't understand. Its a made up term used to try to suppress free speech. And as usual you fall for it.

Being opposed to the radical Islam (and Hanson's comment was in regard to radical Islamists, not that you'll understand that) isn't a phobia. A phobia is an irrational fear. But opposing radical Islam is neither irrational nor a fear.

"a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons.” Which one are you?

" the Albanese government has released its timely response to Aftab Malik's Islamophobia Report"....

It should however be pointed out that Albo was always going to come down in favour of the Islamists. The Muhammadian vote is vitally important to the ALP and there's not a snow-ball's chance in hell that they would do anything other than grovel and bend the knee to the demands of the Islamic community in Australia.

That, of course, partly explains why they were so anxious to 'move on' when members of that group went on a Jew hunting spree in Bondi. Paper over the racism involved and keep the voting block onside. Its why they had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the Royal Commission into Jew hatred. No votes there.

Oh My Dear Trumpster,

"Islamophobia is a recognised word. It is defined as the irrational fear, hatred, or prejudice directed at Islam or Muslims. The term encompasses systemic discrimination, hostility, and negative stereotyping that can lead to violence or social marginalisation."

"Islamophobe" is included the Oxford Dictionary. It is defined as a person who has an irrationally dislike or is prejudice against Islam and Muslims.

"Redneck" is included in the Oxford Dictionary. It is defined as an informal and offensive term for a person living in a rural area (especially in the southern US) who has little education and holds conservative or prejudiced views.

"Fascists" is included in the Oxford Dictionary. It is defined as an extreme right-wing, authoritarian person.

Gee, I would have never believed it, How many times do YOU get a mention in the Oxford Dictionary! And YOU are not the only one.

6-7 is also in the dictionary (word of the year last year).

That doesn't mean it wasn't made up.... just like Islamophobia.

Hi Trumpster, Get It Right.

The word of the year in 2025 was 'AI slop', meaning; "low-quality content created by generative AI which often contains errors."
That's what YOU post on this form 'SLOP'.

You rant and rave about so called WOKE people, a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons.” Which one are you?

"The word of the year in 2025 was 'AI slop',"

Every dictionary group has their own word of the year. 6-7 was Dictionary.com's word of the year. Too complex for you?

"Which one are you?"

No second prizes Paul.

____________________________________________________________________

Meanwhile, getting back to the issue and away from Paul's kindergarten raves, we find that the Albanese government is promising its Muhammadian voting bloc that they'll educate Australian's to embrace Islam....

"Establishing a 12-month Islamophobia Education Taskforce to support education from pre-school through universities, curriculum reviews, and training for police, parliamentarians, and public sector workers."

So pre-schoolers are to indoctrinated. Brave new world. And police also. Maybe the police will be taught the correct form of dhimmitude.

Hi Trumpster,

I do like the Oxford Dictionary word of the year as voted by 30,000 people, 'RAGE BAIT' something we can apply to YOU. Tell YOU the truth and that baits YOU to go into a rage. BTW, where did your word come from the Trumpster Dictionary 6-7 isn't a word, words have letters, not numbers. YOU can thank me later for another education lesson.

NEWS FLASH! The Lovely Pauline from ONE NATION wants a Trump style ICE Outfit, running around Australia rounding up, and shooting people if they "resist" we can assume, citizens and non-citizens alike as part of her MASS DEPORTATION WHITE AUSTRALIA POLICY. Trumpster is that something YOU support? There are a few ratbags on the forum who would be gung-ho with that idea!

A bit off topic however, what is the difference between someone of Caucasian heritage who can not call themselves Indigenous in Australia yet brown people with varied heritage from the Pacific, to Malaysia, Indonesia, japan, China, India & PNG can claim to be indigenous after just one or two Generations ?

Hi Indy,

Caucasian is a myth, just as some on this forum believe they are part of the mythical Aryan race. The term Caucasian was popularised by the 18th century German scientist Johann Friedrich Blumenbach. Based on flawed cranial measurements and the myth that humanity originated in the Caucasus mountains, Blumenbach incorrectly categorised the white race as "Caucasian". What do you consider yourself Caucasian, Aryan, Anglo-Celtic, something else Concrete Jungle Bunny?

As to the second part of your question, “Indigenous” refers to the original or earliest known inhabitants of a specific region or country, prior to colonisation or subsequent waves of settlement. In Australia Aboriginal people are the Indigenous people, about 6% of the worlds population are considered indigenous. People from those places you mentioned, are not indigenous to Australia. Were you "indigenous to that dung heap you lived in before the relos blew the joint to pieces, and your lot scarpered off to Centrelink in Aussie? Just asking, maybe you got blown off from the Caucasus mountains. You don't say.

Well, wouldn't ya know, Caucasian is now superseded by White ? Well, so be it then. Amazing how some racists dig into details when they can't or rather won't answer inconvenient truths !
This explanation by our resident racist actually means that anyone except Whites can claim Aboriginality in Australia even when their bloodline is nowhere near Aborigine or TS islander !

Well Paul... that's a strange way to admit you got it wrong when you asserted (a claim devoid of fact) that 6-7 wasn't declared word of the year.

"Establishing a 12-month Islamophobia Education Taskforce to support education from pre-school ...."

Pre-school? Indoctrination in pre-school? Albo Youth. How perverse can they get? But anything to protect their electoral position is fair game.

I wonder if this is the type of 'education' envisaged to combat 'Islamophobia'. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbyrPUP218Q

The Islamisation of Australia continues and will do so while-ever the ALP is beholden to the Muhammadians for electoral support.

Oh! My Dear Trumpster,

I don't know how to get through to YOU, 6-7 is not a word, Maybe this might help YOU. 6-7=-1 That is an equation, I know the word equation is more that one syllable, so somewhat difficult for a little nong like YOU to pronounce, and beyond your limit of comprehension anyway. Too many big words for a little nong, so just repeat "The cat sat on the mat." If YOU can. On day with my help YOU might graduate kindergarten, before YOU turn 100!

BTW, other than your made up dictionary, where did YOU get 6-7 was the "word" of the year. Certainly not in either the Oxford or Macquarie dictionaries.

News flash, YOU got your phoney word from your favourite rapper, "Skrilla" I though 'Snoop Dogg" was your favourite rapper (until YOU found out he was black)! "67" (pronounced "six-seven"). Popularised by Generation Alpha and a rap song by Skrilla. it is an intentionally nonsensical, ambiguous slang term that kids use as an all-purpose reply, often accompanied by a specific hand gesture. Trumpster, YOU are not Generation Alpha, you're Generation Methuselah, and your favourite rapper is Al Jolson, when YOU discovered he was only putting on 'BLACK FACE". BTW Your specific hand gesture, I say get your hand off it!

"...it is an intentionally nonsensical, ambiguous slang term that kids use as an all-purpose reply."

Google? 'skibidi toilet'

AI Overview
Kids say "skibidi toilet" because it is the name of an incredibly popular, surreal YouTube series about human heads inside toilets fighting robot-headed characters. Children use "skibidi" as catchy slang—often meaning "cool" or "bad" depending on the context—simply because the nonsense word is fun to say.

Hi AC,

"about human heads inside toilets fighting robot-headed characters." Now that is my dear forum friend Trumpster's favourite reading material, he wants to know if its a Dickens classic, and does it come with pictures, and no big words? I'm sure it has a deep and powerful meaning, somewhere down there in the loo. Off fishing now.

I had a mate named Whitey, he's gone now.

He used to tell me his theory about different races all the time, every few months if I remember correctly.

He'd say

'If you're white you're alright
If you're brown you can hang around
But if you're black, you can just f- off.'

I'm not entirely sure if he was racist or not.
It seems brown people were at least somewhat tolerated.

Rest in peace Whitey.

"BTW, other than your made up dictionary,"

Oh dear. Why is this so hard. Now Paul thinks its a made up dictionary. Why do these dills think the way to get out of a hole they've dug is to dig harder?

http://www.dictionary.com/articles/word-of-the-year-2025
http://www.dictionary.com/

Dictioary.com advertises itself as "The Dictionary for the Real World".
The real world? No wonder Paul is lost.

Hi Trumpster,

You poor demented fool. No wounder your vocabulary is limited to one syllable words.

Dictionary.com; While convenient and suitable for general use, by those with a limited knowledge and understanding of the English language, it lacks the scholarly depth or historical tracking required for academic or professional research. For advanced writing or academic work, beyond the elementary level, one suggests consulting primary, publisher-owned lexicographical sources, trusted alternatives with greater precision such as the Oxford and Macquarie dictionaries.

Trumpster, YOU stick with your elementary Play School wordy book, and I will consult those trusted sources of knowledge, like Oxford and Macquarie.

Paul,

That's a strange way to admit you got it all wrong.

As I said, each dictionary has its own word of the year....

Merriam-Webster: “Slop”
Oxford (Oxford University Press): “Rage bait”
Cambridge Dictionary: “Parasocial”
Collins Dictionary: “Vibe coding”
Dictionary.com: “67” (or “six seven”)

But Paul, totalitarian that he is, thinks that only his view is true and everything else is made up.

Its a minor point but indicative of why and how Paul gets so much wrong.

Hi Trumpster,

"That's a strange way to admit you got it all wrong." I got nothing wrong. As I said to YOU 67 is a number, not a word. Words are made up of consonants and vowels, I wont even try to explain to YOU what they are,that would be too much, such things are above your kindergarten level of understanding, other than to say letters are squiggly little things, never mind. I should have realised that YOU would not be familiar with the number 67, as it is greater than the 24 fingers and toes a person like YOU will have for counting.

Dictionary.com: “67” so this is a "number dictionary", I thought the dictionary YOU used was made up entirely of pictures, Ant, Bat, Cat, Dog, Egg, etc.

screwed up right wing radical, who believed Iraq was responsible for 9/11. Got that wrong,
Paul1405,
Kind of like a punitive expedition after a massacre of Macassar & White Beche-de-mer fishers up near cape York in the 1870's when locals told the police "it was that mob" & after that mob got dealt with very harshly, these same locals turned around & said "no, it was the other mob".
By twisting the truth i.e. lying, they got rid of their enemies & the Police was lumped with more accusations.

"it lacks the scholarly depth or historical tracking required for academic or professional research."

Paul, who two days ago thought Dictionary.com was something I made up, is suddenly an expert on it!!

Keep digging.

Hi Trumpster,

Your English comprehension is phenomenal, who else would believe 6-7 is a word, not me. AND its not even in that pair of useless dictionaries the Oxford or the Macquarie. What is your favourite word 32+97?

"Dictioary.com advertises itself as "The Dictiuary for the Real World".

Well the first thing they should do is learn how to spell the word DICTIONARY. Maybe they should look it up in the Oxford or the Macquarie dictionaries. Not much point in asking YOU how to sell DICTIONARY. YOU would say DICTIONARY, Its spelt 475-987. WHAT A CLOWN!

P/S Dictioary.com (that is pronounced "DICK-AND-HAIRY") should advertise itself as "The Dictiuary for the Real Iliterate". That's YOU

Hi Again Trumpster, Salutations.

I didn't say you made up a dictionary, that would defiantly be beyond your capability. What I said was;

BTW, other than your made up dictionary, where did YOU get 6-7 was the "word" of the year. Certainly not in either the Oxford or Macquarie dictionaries.

Who made it up, I don't know. As I gave YOU lessons in Old English, at which YOU completely failed, I doubt that YOU would be capable of mastering Modern English, since YOU can not tell the difference between words and mathematical equations. Is there any other subject, I'm sure they are plenty, that YOU are completely inept at, and require my tutoring. I am happy to assist, at your convenience, just say the word. Oh! that will be difficult since YOU don't know what words are.

"I didn't say you made up a dictionary...."

Its entirely understandable that many of my posts go over your head. But its beyond parody when your own posts go over your head.

see the white supremacist ploughing into the ' pride' festival in Germany. Hang on surprise it is the Islamist. I am sure all the 'gays' for Palestine will be shocked.

Was the White Australia Policy designed to make Australia all White literally or was it meant to be multicultural with White compatible, non-anti white migrants of various ethnicities ?
What other non-white countries allow Whites to live among them in the same manner many ethnic groups can reside in Australia in unlimited numbers ? How many of the other Nations offer welfare to Whites like Australia does ?

Hi Indy,

Again, not sure what YOU are on about. The White Australia Policy, was designed to keep Australia European, ostensibly British, with laws that discriminated against non-whites. I think YOU know that already. There is plenty of examples of non-white countries where not only did Europeans live among the local population, but controlled the local population, it was called Colonialism. I think YOU know that already as well, Colonial Australia is such a country.

"How many of the other Nations offer welfare to Whites like Australia does?" America, Canada, New Zealand, others.

Gee, we give YOU unlimited aged welfare, and YOU are a migrant. Are you not the lucky one?

... others.
Paul1405,
How many Islamic countries take in European migrants & would they take in European refugees ? As for the aged pension, I have given as much as the average blue collar worker & I still pay tax from my Pension. And, I'm not advocating for Australia to be taken over & Australians to submit to some Dark ages Ideology !

"How many Islamic countries take in European migrants & would they take in European refugees ?"

Islamic countries don't even take in Muhammadian refugees.

Hi Trumpster,

Your lack of knowledge is astounding;

"Islamic countries don't even take in Muhammadian refugees."

Turkiye an Islamic country, 3.2 million refugees, the majority Muslims from Syria due to civil war, given protection status. Iran an Islamic republic, 1.65 million Muslim refugees. Pakistan Islamic, 1.5 million Muslim refugees.

What an ignorant tosser, YOU have become!

I just want to state that I'm sick of the Cover More insurance ad.
It's completely un Australian and should be banned.

'A flesh coloured fanny-pack'

Are these people for real?
Have they been trying to clean their ears with a nailgun or something?
Do they actually think 'flesh-coloured fanny-pack' will resonate with Australian people?

FYI, we call it a 'beige bumbug' here you stupid Americans.

Hi AC,

Can't say I've seen that particular ad, tend to watch My ABC ad free you know! But I'm the first to agree, a 'flesh coloured fanny-pack' is totally un-Australian, and not in any shape or form part of our Anglo-Celtic heritage! Where as a 'beige bumbug' is certainly in keeping with the true Aussie sprite! Gallipoli, Waltzing Matilda, the flag, the dog on the tuckerbox, QANTAS, meat pies, Holden cars, Kangaroos, Pauline Hanson...I'll have to stop, I'm getting all emotional just thinking about it!

BTW; What is a 'flesh coloured fanny-pack'?

Paul,

Just making the assertion doesn't prove the point.

Yes, Pakistan ended up with lots of Afghan refugees. They promptly deported them. Which is apparently fine and dandy with the usual suspects. Deportation is only bad when the US does it.

Turkey took some Syrian refugees and promptly used them to overthrow the Syrian government whereupon they were encouraged to go home.

The only place the Jordanian Palestinians could find that would take them after Jordan kicked them out was Christian Lebanon.

If the Muslim nations are so good at taking their refugees, why are there millions of them in Europe, the US, Australia and Canada?

Don't worry, I don't expect a considered reply.

Hi Paul
This travesty.
http://youtu.be/BsY8ru3RfjE

Hi Trumpster,

No, Muslim countries (poor third world countries) are not that good at taking the millions of refugees created by Western imperialism. Australia takes in 20,000 (not millions) of refugees annually. America since October 2025, has taken 4,400 refugees in a population of almost 350 million, very few are Muslim refugees.

"Christian Lebanon." with about 30% of Lebanese Christian, now the Zionist with a total annihilation policy are turning Lebanon into a human desert, no one is safe, Christian, Muslim or refugee.

"No, Muslim countries (poor third world countries) are not that good at taking the millions of refugees created by Western imperialism. "

Yes, I know. In your circles its always the west's fault. Of course, the Palestinian refugees in Lebanon were created when they were expelled from Jordan, by Jordan because they tried to overthrow the Jordanian government. But I'm sure you'll convince yourself that was caused by the west.

And the Syrian refugees were caused by a civil war in Syria between the (Muslim) ISIS and the (Russian backed) Syrian government. But I'm sure you'll convince yourself that was caused by the west.

And the Pakistani refugees were caused by internal fighting between Pakistani sects as well as fighting with India. But I'm sure you'll convince yourself that was caused by the west.

The US has a Muhammadian population of about 4 million. At least 25% are refugees.

""Christian Lebanon." with about 30% of Lebanese Christian"

Lebanon was Christian before the refugees from Jordan appeared and created Hezbullah. A bit of historic knowledge wouldn't do you any harm.

"Don't worry, I don't expect a considered reply."

And I didn't get one.

turning Lebanon into a human desert
Paul140,
you certainly have an odd way of looking at the World. Lebanon was a fantastic nation until Palestinians moved there. Israel can & probably will bring Lebanon back to some normalcy Inshallah or God willing ! Look what happened to Iran ? Look what's happening to all around the World & Australia being in the crosshairs now too ! I suppose there will be two Worlds in future, islamic & the West, once the dumb-crap indoctrinated Western pseudo intellectuals are coming to their senses !

Amazing how our resident racist is not answering & simply waits for the threads to come to a close. He does it all the time as everyone here is aware of !

I am one who doesn't think that 'all men are created equal'.
We are born with vastly different mental and physical abilities.
Some will achieve much, and provide a wealth of knowledge and improvement for their society.
And some will just exist, and not do much more than that.
However, it is logical that before the law we must all be treated equally.
And all benefit from the same set of 'rights and privileges' as are enforced by law.
And we should all have the same responsibilities.
And if we as a society decide to allow migration from other societies and cultures, we should be careful.
Not so much discriminative, but bringing in only small numbers of those from countries with vastly different social systems.
It behooves us to manage these numbers, to make for a slow and painless integration.
At the present time we are being 'flooded' by all and sundry.
Society is being pulled this way and that by many conflicting cultures.
And worse. Housing for these people has not been seriously considered.
So it is a disaster.
We need to pause immediately, and work out what we must do to change this state of affairs.

Hi Indy,

Are YOU expecting that poster YOU racially vilified by referring to him as the "CONCRETE JUNGLE BUNNY" to reply. Reply to what, "Look what happened to Iran?" That's not a question, then again YOU said the sh!thole YOU came from was no more, bombed out of existence, I assume by your relatives. I can only imagine that YOU were on the losing side in WW2.

Paul1405,
You really are a sad example of a loser who has to resort to bring up petty accusations because of not having answers. I'll make it easy for you, do you support Australia being a Western nation or a caliphate ?
ps. I don't think I ever accused you or indeed anyone of being a CJB on account of their ethnicity ! If I did please show us.

Hi Indy,

I support Australia as it is, a a progressive liberal democracy, I believe in a secular state, where church and state are separated. No caliphate, no radical Islam, no inquisitions, none of that religious rubbish. Anyone who tried to impose such nonsense should be a-holed! What I don't agree with is those people who try to tar all within a section of the community with the same brush.

What I don't agree with is those people who try to tar all within a section of the community with the same brush.
Paul1405,
Only the race-baiters say so. What most people & rightly so are referring to are incompatible migrants & as they're incompatible it is only natural & perfectly normal that they're tarred with the same brush & so the should be. It's because Australians have been too tolerant for too long that the incompatibles are now exploiting the loopholes to disrupt society. Incompatibles are not only among migrants,.They're also in official circles & they're Australian born citizens who sacrifice Australian society for their own insidious agenda, mostly leftist political. They had it too good for too long ! Decent folk have had enough !

Hi Indy,

If people don't agree with YOU politically, YOU stigmatise them as "incomparable". The majority of Australians at the last federal election didn't agree with YOU. Two party preferred vote was Labor 55/45 over the Coalition. YOU are in the minority, YOU are a migrant, YOU are incompatible, OUT YOU GO!

Paul1405,
The last election wasn't won by Labor, the Coalition was lost by Dutton who would have managed far far better by now than those who got in because of excessive & vile negativity spread about the man & not the party.
Just remember where the votes for Labor came from, not from working Australians ! In my days we were called New Australians, lately many migrants are New Au$tralians ! I just hope that those responsible for selling this once great nation out will get their just dessert !

Hi Indy,

Your assumption have no validity, "Dutton who would have managed far far better by now" I think the economy would be more or less about the same as it is now, under the Coalition. One thing I agree with the Old Fart saying, Labor and the Coalition are similar parties, centre moderate, one slightly left and the other slightly right. Both parties can be categorises as somewhat progressive, whilst supporting the existing economic and social order. With the two parities of government both being centre moderate, it brings a degree of political stability to the country. Transitioning government from one side to the other is orderly and presents no problem, imagine the chaos if the country was run by fragmented radicals from the extreme, both sides competing for power.

if the country was run by fragmented radicals from the extreme, both sides competing for power.
Paul1405,
What do you mean "If" ? Please explain ? Like some other mutt said "Only 60% of the Australian population are made up by minority groups". ?? Or that indigenous leader who said on ABC "If the Government gave us more money we could be financially independent" ! Even the indigenous are now staring to see that the bad White Man is looking after them better than any other ethnic group ever will. Remember Fiji & Colonel Rambuka ?

Hi Indy,

"If the Government gave us more money we could be financially independent". Another racist Goebbelism from YOU, no Aboriginal leader said that on the ABC or anywhere else. In face Aboriginal leaders frequently call for changes that will allow First Nations people to move away from welfare dependency. A bit rich coming from YOU, who is living of the welfare system, and has done so for, how many years is it now! 20.