The Forum > General Discussion > Civilisations die by suicide, not by murder
Civilisations die by suicide, not by murder
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
Posted by Armchair Critic, Thursday, 13 February 2025 5:27:11 PM
| |
Dear Ttbn,
Sorry if it sounded personal: the "you" in my previous post referred in plural to all those wishing to reserve Australia for its historical mainstream culture - it was not referring in any way to you in person. That culture, a derivative of British culture, includes the English language, but also beer, gambling on horses, certain sports and more, thus one cannot be said to be truly Australian or truly assimilated without adopting all the above. Good that Australians no longer go fox-hunting with the dogs... I suppose that tea-drinking (caffeinated) is still the norm - When I came to Australia, I found that avoiding caffeinated drinks used to keep me a stranger to mainstream Australian culture for over a decade. Thank goodness it changed since and herbal teas are more common now, yet some older Australians could still never accept me if I do not drink their tea. Immigrants, so long as they are peaceful, do not owe assimilation to that or to any other culture because the land does not belong to any culture to begin with, nor ought it be a privilege to settle anywhere on this God-created planet. The British in 1788 (who besides were not even more peaceful toward the natives than Middle-Eastern Muslims today) did not ask the Australian aborigines for the privilege to migrate, nor were expected to assimilate into their culture or speak their languages, so why should it be any different now? «irrespective of the roots and culture of individuals there can be only ONE culture for a secure happy country.» A country can neither be happy nor sad. Only people and some evolved animals can, then within the same country, always some will be happy and others not. As for security, that is an illusion, only the grave is secure. No matter how many cultures there are, one could be happy one moment and slip on a banana peel the next breaking their bones. Posted by Yuyutsu, Thursday, 13 February 2025 5:59:47 PM
| |
Hey Indy,
Israel’s refusal to grant Palestinian refugees right to return has fuelled seven decades of suffering http://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2019/05/israels-refusal-to-grant-palestinian-refugees-right-to-return-has-fuelled-seven-decades-of-suffering/ They can't go home even if they wanted to. Australia's their new 'forever-home' But don't blame me, I didn't do it. [shrugs] Posted by Armchair Critic, Thursday, 13 February 2025 6:13:43 PM
| |
So far the Jew-hating nurses have been sacked and deregistered.
Posted by ttbn, Thursday, 13 February 2025 6:25:25 PM
| |
I was a little surprised that the police were so quick to claim that there was no evidence of harm. Were they the same police who found that the chanters at SOH didn't say anything hateful? Was any investigation of hospital records done to support the claim? Brushing things under the carpet like that is moronic and does nothing to restore public confidence.
It is very upsetting to hear health professionals say things like that, even in jest. Here is a video showing that multiculturalism is alive in Israel and that Arab Israelis are a big part of it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1aOao4BNXE Posted by Fester, Thursday, 13 February 2025 8:10:39 PM
| |
"So far the Jew-hating nurses have been sacked and deregistered."
- As they should be. I don't particularly have a problem with them having anger or resentment towards Jewish people, it's kind of like Australian indigenous having anger and resentment towards the invaders. - There's a certain element of merit in that anger and resentment I think, but there's also a line that you can't cross, and those nurses foolishly crossed it. You shouldn't mess with anyone's health for any reason. Even convicted criminals receive a basic level of healthcare when required. The bigger question is if they ever did anything to undermine anyones health outcomes, they may have just been saying stuff because the man was stirring them up. They have not been charged with a crime, and I wonder if they will be. I expect they will be charged with some kind of racially motivated hate crime, maybe even threats of murder. I'm not sure how I feel about them being charged, for me I think it all depends on whether any evidence of deliberate mistreatment of patients occurred. If they were just talking bs, then I think the total loss of their careers and shame of family and friends might suffice as punishment enough, (I'm sure their qualifications didn't come cheap) but if they did anything at all malicious with their patients, then that's a different thing entirely. They can't work in that profession anymore, so I think any risk towards patients based on what they said has been removed. http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/feb/13/minister-to-meet-staff-at-bankstown-hospital-as-two-nurses-anti-israeli-video-threats-investigated "I wanted to visit Bankstown hospital with David Ossip [the president of the board of deputies] to apologise to the Jewish community. To assure him and the Jewish community that those two individuals don’t reflect the values of NSW Health. But also to convey to the hard-working staff of Bankstown hospital that we acknowledge those vile individuals don’t represent our workforce." [Cont.] Posted by Armchair Critic, Thursday, 13 February 2025 8:34:09 PM
|
Does anyone here know about the Mamilla Pool in the year 614?
Jews purchased 60,000 captured Christians mostly women and children from the Persians for one purpose, - to slaughter them all for fun.
True story.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamilla_Pool
"Following the Persian capture of Jerusalem from the Byzantines in 614, tens of thousands of Christians were massacred by Jews at the pool. Israeli archaeologist Ronny Reich estimates a death toll of 60,000 people before the Persian authorities put an end to the killing.
The eyewitness account of Strategius of St. Sabas narrates: "Jews ransomed the Christians from the hands of the Persian soldiers for good money, and slaughtered them with great joy at Mamilla Pool, and it ran with blood." The Sulha al-Quds, the treaty of Jerusalem's capitulation to Muslim forces in 638, can only be understood in the context of the massacre at Mamilla. In it, the Christian Patriarch Sophronius of Jerusalem required that the Arab ruler Umar protect the people of Jerusalem from the Jews."
God's Chosen People
- Chosen for what exactly - to kill or enslave everyone else?