Multiculturalism - code word for anti-white?

No. multiculturalism is actually multi-coloured.

We owe our accomplishments as a nation to the
contributions of more than 300 different ancestries from
the First Australians to the newest arrivals.
The rich cultural diversity is central to our national
identity.

SR's reference is taking a loooooong time to download. But it is a government site and, while SR believes everything the government tells him, more and more of us do not. Politicians and bureaucrats have proved many times that they cannot be trusted. Some people are slow learners, or they just pick reports and opinions that suit their own bigotry. Still downloading; don't think I'll bother with it, given SR's and the government's unreliability and slipperiness.

'had the Zionists came to Uganda instead, then these Jews would have treated the Ugandan people just as badly as they treat the Palestinians'.

"That is all nonsense of course, which goes against any science".

Why 'Of course'?
- I mean, you are what your history says you are, right?
And Jews, being persecuted for thousands of years by many different peoples... why?

Why would the Ugandan people have gladly given up their land to make room for a Jewish homeland, and been pleased to do so?
- That there wouldn't have been any animosity whatsoever between the Ugandan people that currently populated the land and the Jews that wanted to create their own homeland on it.

I'm not necessarily stating the Jews shouldn't have a homeland.
If they say in their own words that they are not the same as gentiles, and that there has been a history of animosity wherever they've resided, then why wouldn't that same scenario hold true in Uganda, or anywhere?

I've looked back at Israel in Palestine, and basically the reason why this 'People without a land, and a land without a people' idea was put forward was because Israel did not consider these people a 'people' at all.

The author of this book was given many literary prizes and was even nominated for one by the Israeli Prime Minister, so for Yuyutsu to say that it's just 'superstitious fatalism' doesn't entirely add up. Obviously many Jews thought his opinions held merit.

I'm not stating as fact that Jews or Zionists have set out to undermine all other nations through immigration, but when one of them says - 'this is what we need to do' (Attacking other nations 'racial homogeneity'), then it's certainly worth taking a closer look.

I can see it as a viable consideration if they were looking for a way to end persecution and feel safe, and I see it demonstrated today in the way they wish to have significant influence over the governments in which they reside.

I've long said that there's system in place that seeks to destroy any feeling of 'nationalism' and 'national identity', and that it's been replaced with 'globalism' and 'multiculturalism', that they don't seem to care about cultures, but wish to impose a new global generic culture upon all peoples.

That democracy is not about 'national democracy' and letting the people decide what they want, but more about 'international democracy' and rule by UN and international treaty where nations are merely vassal states of the US and globalism.

All the important issues are already decided by international higher ups or else the 2 parties are bi-partisan, and they allow us to fight amongst ourselves in regards to the secondary national issues, that don't really matter, but give us all a sense that we are deciding the future of our country.

But it's not our country, and we don't make the decisions.
We are reminded constantly that we're all immigrants; essentially guests not owners.

If a Jew states
"We have joined your capitalistic world in deliberate emulation and rivalry: yet Jewish socialism and Jewish socialists are the banner bearers of the world’s 'armies of liberation'." and that they have a religious ideology and beliefs (Messianic) that seeks to rule over all nations and peoples.
- Why would I not take that seriously, given Jewish Socialism created the USSR?

Hi Indyvidual
"The problem for Australia in this case is that they’re guaranteed Labor Votes."

I made that argument a long time ago, indyvidual.
- Because the left is far more supportive of immigrants and immigration;
Somebody else made a counter argument that Muslims are not likely to vote for LGBT and progressives, which seem to hold some merit also.

Hi Foxy
"The rich cultural diversity is central to our national identity."
Multicultural Australia is not the same as True-Blue Australia.

First they changed the people and attitudes in government, and then through immigration the government changed the demographics of the people.

I liked true-blue Australia.
Yes we were racist, but I don't think it was racism in a bad way entirely.
(Though I'm sure there were many bad instances as well)
I think it was more about 'assimilation of foreigners into the country they were coming into' rather than the current trend of 'us assimilating into the countries they came from'.

- The path of acceptance in becoming an 'Aussie'

We might work with a Greek bloke.
We'd call him a 'bloody wog' at work for years and he hated it.
Finally 20 years later he loses it.
"Says F--- you Aussies, you're all racist bastards!"
Aussies would be like "We've been wondering when this was going to happen Roberto, we've been waiting for years."
"Calm down mate - You're one of us now!"
"Everyone give a big round of applause for Roberto, he's now officially one of us."

"You bloody bastards, why you do this to me"

Hi AC,

"True Blue," in Australian society depends on who
you ask. It varies and differs town to town,
suburb to suburb, and group to group.

Historically, the Australian population has been
segregated by class, race, and also purpose.
In the colonial era many came for punishment, and others
to rule. As time progressed the social fabric became
homogenised - but only so much as it kept those of
non-Anglo descent at the fringes.

Clearly for some this is still continuing today.