Oh good, no need for trial. Foxy has already decided Jones' guilt.

Either way, I hope the truth comes out (no pun intended) before he dies and the whole issue doesn't become another Jimmy Saville case.

Foxy of course is a rampant hypocrite.

AJ is not accused of rape or underage sex, but essentially harassing other men probably decades ago who have failed to come forward or make any complaint to the police against a man in his mid-80s who is essentially retired.

What Foxy is silent on is the conga line of greens accused and some convicted of child rape, and she claims that Shorten is exonerated of the accusation of rape made against him

People might realise that this is not a case of an "ordinary guy" who went astray, and should, on being exposed face the consequences. No, like a couple of others before him, Jones is a person in society who because of his position of power, influence and wealth has avoided justice that any ordinary guy would have been subjected to. The question can be asked, are we all equal under the law? The short answer is no, people like Jones through their position in society are able to avoid the justice of ordinary folk. In my lifetime this is the third case of a very powerful person, in an exalted position being able to avoid the consequences of their actions by exercising power and influence over others. The first was the Liberal Prime Minister McMahon, then years later the conservative cleric Cardinal Pell. Now we add shock jock and conservative power broker Alan Jones to the list.

Some years back, the cops raided a well known boy brothel in Sydney, they arrested several men who were there for the purpose of having sex with underage boys. All except one were arrested, the one who avoided the law, he was a NSW Supreme Court judge. His limousine and driver were discreetly parked a short distance away, the judge was taken home.

Shadowminister,

Correct. But there is no point in trying to get through to evil neo-Communists like that woman.

I'm unashamedly a fan of of Alan Jones: I watch him twice a week on ADH TV. Jones is one of group of conservative commentators on the channel - available by app - who provide an alternative to the Marxist drivel on the mainstream media: Nick Cater, Damien Coory, David Flint, Fred Pawle, Lyle Shelton and others.

I don't care about Alan Jones' sexual predilections (isn't that how his enemies say we should think about other sexual deviants: the gender-benders and the line-up of different genders?). His brain and his politics are the only things of interest to me.

If Jones has committed any crime against people who have made complaints to the media, instead of to the police when the alleged behaviour occurred, the courts are there to deal with it. It's not our business, and it is certainly not the business of a woman who still thinks that Cardinal Pell was guilty after the High Court found that he was not. Her sort are like the pitchfork carriers and witch-burners of the Dark Ages.

Alan Jones's history is well known in Sydney.
I did not decide his guilt. His actions did.
And for that he should fess up. This is not
about his sexual preferences. It's about a
person in a position of power, misusing that
power without given consent.

You guys may not find that distressing. However
so many young men have found it distressing
enough to come forward.

Calling me names for raising this subject -
says more about you than it does about me.
Surely at least some of you can do better than that.