The report is essentially correct.

I'm seeing more and more of these cases of scientists and medical experts being brave enough to challenge the so-called consensus on climate and other issues like Covid. I'm not sure if its a case of people becoming more inclined to tell their truths as they find like minded others, or if the errors in climate and covid research become ever more egregious.

Probably a combination of the two.

Another example of what I was talking about...

http://dailysceptic.org/2023/09/14/the-corruption-of-climate-science-in-australia/

Some insight to climate capers.

http://www.science.org/content/article/peak-solar-activity-arriving-sooner-expected-reaching-levels-not-seen-20-years

Nothing in hot weather news about heat from climate change or about heat from solar flares.
Truth could expose their alternative energy marketing caper.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/temps-tipped-to-soar-1015c-above-monthly-averages-as-nsw-warned-of-potentially-severe-heatwave/news-story/c1ef6915a2c3148b02a67af5782c1884?amp

Nothing in hot weather news about heat from climate change or about heat from solar flares.
Truth would expose their alternative energy marketing caper.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/temps-tipped-to-soar-1015c-above-monthly-averages-as-nsw-warned-of-potentially-severe-heatwave/news-story/c1ef6915a2c3148b02a67af5782c1884?amp

I believe the Skeptics report is generally quite correct.
We have a prime example right in front of us in Prof Peter Ridd and
the UN scandal about the Great Barrier reef.