JF Aus says: "I have a question of my own and I challenge climate science for the answer".

I don't think you'll find any climate scientists in the general discussion area so I doubt your question will be answered here.

I do know that there is a lot of research on line so I suggest you start your search there.

It is an interesting question so get back to us when you have completed your answer.

Hasbeen says: "Guess what, I don't give a damn what researchers might take offense at."

I doubt that researchers in general will be caring about input about their work that is essentially childish name calling.

But somehow I do not think Hasbeen will reduce his emotional name calling when confronted with evidence that challenges his world view.

Here is a life tip Hasbeen -The facts don't care about your feelings.

There is stronger evidence now that snowball Earth resulted from volcanic eruptions and subsequent weathering of the volcanic rock. Is there any chance of better understanding the process and seeing whether it might be used for our benefit? Not on your life as any such proposal would get screamed down by the global boiling catastrophists. Like nuclear power, anything that might work or be economically viable is off the table with these zealots.

"So few if any people in the Artic and mhaze's reference is saying that there is an underestimation of the global warming rate."

It would be the height of naivety to think that the warming would be uniform around the world. AFAIR, all research into previous NATURAL warming periods finds uneven warming around the globe.

So one place warming more or less than another place is really a mere curiosity although of vital importance for the folk in those places.

Nonetheless, the overall conclusion from the paper is that the currently most favoured databases of temperature over estimate the level of warming; that, from USCRN, it is likely that, outside the urban concrete jungles, warming is virtually non-existent this century; and from the publication bias exposed, we are not getting anywhere near the full story.

Its all designed to transfer vast sums from the poor to the rich

"Its all designed to transfer vast sums from the poor to the rich".

Yes. It probably is that simple, and the usual simpletons have fallen for it. The old adage, 'The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer' has never been truer.

The poor are certainly suffering under the 'climate emergency' confidence trick, which is backed by the rich who can afford to pay for it. The difference in the percentage of income the poor pays for electricity compared with the percentage the rich pays is enormous.

The carbon dioxide scam is undoubtedly the worst in history, given its vast effect on so many people, and the fact that the con is being operated by governments.

WTF?

mhaze states "Nonetheless, the overall conclusion from the paper is that the currently most favoured databases of temperature over estimate the level of warming; that, from USCRN, it is likely that, outside the urban concrete jungles, warming is virtually non-existent this century."

Also " we are not getting anywhere near the full story."

It is you who are getting nowhere near the full story.

Quoting from your linked resources:

"All six major global temperature datasets used for analysis in the report agree that the last eight years (2015–22) were the eight warmest on record. The annual global mean surface temperature has increased at an average rate of 0.14 to 0.16 of a degree F (0.08 to 0.09 of a degree C) per decade since 1880, and at a rate more than twice as high since 1981."

More from your linked resources: The July Global Land and Ocean
July Temperature Anomalies have not had a negative value from the mean since 1976 and the negative variation from the mean has not been less than 0.2 degrees since 1935.

As I have said before, mhaze, you do agree with me that warming continues to occur.

Global warming is increasing - that we all agree on that.