Hello Hasbeen,

Your last post is a little unclear to me.

NASA can get funding from government(the tax payer) which you seem to think is problematic.

NASA can get funding from private enterprise which you seem to think is problematic.

Where else can they get their money from?

WTF?

mhaze

Actually NASA says:'Earth is composed of four main layers, starting with an inner core at the planet's centre, enveloped by the outer core, mantle, and crust.

The inner core is a solid sphere made of iron and nickel metals about 759 miles (1,221 kilometres) in radius. There the temperature is as high as 9,800 degrees Fahrenheit (5,400 degrees Celsius). Surrounding the inner core is the outer core. This layer is about 1,400 miles (2,300 kilometres) thick, made of iron and nickel fluids.

In between the outer core and crust is the mantle, the thickest layer. This hot, viscous mixture of molten rock is about 1,800 miles (2,900 kilometres) thick and has the consistency of caramel. The outermost layer, Earth's crust, goes about 19 miles (30 kilometres) deep on average on land. At the bottom of the ocean, the crust is thinner and extends about 3 miles (5 kilometres) from the seafloor to the top of the mantle."

See how easy research is?

So you are wrong - again.

WTF?

mhaze I misread your post.

Obviously I thought you were talking about Earth.

So that information while correct does not relate to your planet.

However NASA has categorized exoplanets into the following types: Gas giant, Neptunian, super-Earth and terrestrial.

So not your description.

WTF,

Way out of your depth. Making stuff up, refusing to provide evidence. etc etc. Not a good look.

You wrote: "mhaze respons [sic] that it does not exist."

That's not what I said at all. I said there was nothing there that supported your claims. There's plenty there that supported mine. Making stuff up again.

"Obviously I thought you were talking about Earth."
So you 'thought' I was saying the Earth was made of strawberry yoghurt. Wow!! I really should stop doing sarcasm - it flies over the heads of the dull. But its so much fun.

WTF?

mhaze - do you see how it works? I misread and corrected myself.

That's integrity at work for you just there.

So your flippant, deflective claim is easy disproved using the website you referenced. See how easy it is? Just a sad attempt to fail at proving a point.

You are only a few mouse clicks away from finding the information that I did.

I suggest you learn how to use all the functions of search engines and the layout and navigation of websites including their drop down menus.

In future I suggest that you take a little time investigation the information provided by the organisations that you want to reference.

So quoting from the link you provided in an earlier post:

"The heat content of the global ocean has increased since at least 1970, and will continue to increase over the 21st century (virtually certain). The associated warming will likely continue until at least 2300, even for low-emissions scenarios, because of the slow circulation of the deep ocean."

You can see this graphically in the accompanying graph.

WTF,

You made specific claims about ARGO's data. ARGO started in 2000. Relying on a quote that talks about 1970 is utterly beside the point. There was no ARGO in 1970. Do try to keep up or at least be internally consistent in your increasingly inane claims.

Earlier, I formed the working assumption that WTF was in fact a previous poster called ant who also called himself Tony153. ant had finally decamped the group after making a series of claims which he couldn't hope to support with any data. WTF seemed to be a bit more switched on than 'ant' so I figured I was wrong to link the two.

Alas, I've now revised that opinion. Its the same pattern of inane claims that are unsupported by any data, followed by attempts to obfuscate the error.

Welcome back ant.