So no links from WTF....pretty much what I expected. We all know what's going on here.

As to my previous mention of Argo...I got it from here: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/chapter-9/

WTF?

Yes we all know what's going on here mhaze.

Nobody is going to hold your hand through this.

The information is there. It is easy to find.

One more time just for use - use the drop down menu from the primary information source the ARGO website.

Extra bonus hint - the topic is ocean warming.

Same old denialist behaviour.

WTF?

mhaze your link takes us to a website that I quoted from on a previous discussion back on 31 July.

In that link there is a graph that shows some of the same detail as the ARGO graphs.

Have you found it yet?

OK WTF, you shot your mouth off making claims that you hoped were right but which you couldn't and can't support with actual data. You claim the data exists but refuse to provide it.

Anyone with a modicum of integrity would either supply the data/link or own up.

Now you are trying to hide the error by referring to other things. There is nothing in the link I provided that supports your claims.

Oh by the way, did you know the third planet in the Alpha Centauri B system is made out of strawberry yoghurt. Oh you want proof? Well its on the NASA website but you'll have to find it yourself - no hand holding here.

Foxy, WTF? there was a time when NASA & particularly the CSIRO were very useful organisations doing important & very useful work. That was the time before the lefts long march through the institutions & their need for tax payer money bastradised them into a mouthpiece for what ever they were told to say.

Only full card carrying members of the useful idiots religion could possibly believe what they say these days. Hell NASA even need private enterprise to launch their satellites today.

WTF?

mhaze

On a discussion thread I started on 31st July relating to ocean warming I provided some information provided by the IPCC 6th Assessment report.

You responded with: " And the Argo project is showing only minor warming at depths and indeed cooling in plenty of locations. You can't build a scare campaign on that, so the IPCC, while mentioning the Argo data, hurries to skip over it."

I begin this discussion by referencing information found not only on the ARGO website but also the AMS website.

mhaze cannot find the information from the ARGO website so suggests the information does not exist even though he initially references ARGO.

Where did he get his information from then?

Well he supplies a link to guess what? - The IPCC 6th Assessment report.

I indicate to mhaze that this website also contains graphical data that reflects some of the AGROS graphical data.

mhaze respons that it does not exist.

mhaze you have referenced both the ARGO project and the IPCC 6th Assessment report to try to back your opinion.

Both of the AGRO wesite and the IPCC 6th Assessment show clear graphical representation of increased ocean warming.

But mhaze cannot find it.

Just because you cannot find information provided by your references does not mean it does not exist.

You reference both AGRO and IPCC and you cannot navigate through them to find information.

Deflection, semantics and denial. I'll add poor research skills as well.