'Russian losses are unsustainable'
You've been sold a lie, just like 'Russia has run out of missiles' just like all the other lies they sold you.

Maybe eventually they will find WMD's in Iraq at some point?
- If you 'believe' it then who am I to say you're wrong and convince you otherwise?

If Russian losses were as bad as Ukraine claims and the US repeats, there would be civil unrest and opposition to the war in Russia.

All they can do is weak as piss attacks on non-combatants, women and bloggers inside Russia for propaganda purposes and optics of putting up a good fight, did the same by having an innocent dupe drive a truckload of fertiliser over the Kersh Strait bridge, but none of these things are going to take back lost territory.

Were Russia all that capable, it would go in and finish the job now.
Why isn't it doing that?
Why is it holding back?
There is more to this than news reports allow us.

BREAKING NEWS | WAGNER CAPTURES BAKHMUT 20/05/23
http://youtu.be/5Ov4qLlw5ww

Exactly one year to the day since they captured Mariupol.

You wanna know why Ukraine always says that it has a really high success rate hitting Russian drones and missiles?

Did you watch that earlier twitter video
- 32 missiles from a US Patriot in 2 minutes?
That footage tells a story.

To understand why Ukraine has such a high success rate you need to ask yourself
"What happens to all the missiles the Ukrainian air defense fires that miss?"
- They sometimes hit residential buildings.
So you say you have a really high success rate for interception.
(and imply the missiles you fire never miss)

- Then when your own troops unintentionally fire an air defence missile into a residential building;
- You can say "Russia did it! Deliberately. War Crimes."
"Russia is deliberately targeting innocent people"
- And stealing children.

We're all fed garbage.
80% of what the media tells you is propaganda.
One take away is that Ukrainian air defense isn't as great as claimed.
On the other hand, it is great for US weapon exports though, regardless of outcome.

Another is that Russia isn't deliberately targeting residential buildings unless military or military related personnel are in them.

Hi AC,

You might think that you have a greater understanding of truth, but I think that we are all in the peanut gallery.

Bakhmut has been completely demolished, which is why the Ukrainian forces left. How long do you think it will be before the Russians are forced to retreat from it?

"Russia isn't deliberately targeting residential buildings unless military or military related personnel are in them."

The Russian army has less accurate weapons and is renowned for targeting civilians. Remember all the Bucha residents that were murdered? Many ham radio operators heard the Russian commanders issuing orders to kill civilians.

I understand that the Russian media is claiming that the lack of progress in the war is because of poor command and the claim that the Russian army is fighting the entirety of NATO forces. Further, it claims that these forces are nearly all destroyed.

Over the coming months it should become clear what is happening. No amount of propaganda can hide a defeat. If the Ukrainians can effectively cut supplies to Russian troops at the front their task will be much easier. I suspect that this is what they are trying to do.

The Ukrain/Russia affair is bats..t boring. It is now low priority even on the hysterical main stream media.

Tonight, on 7, at 8.30, there is a story about our political class seemingly intending to allow the Chinese Communist Party to destroy an Australian rain forest!

Pay more attention to your own country and the trash ruining it. Let foreigners look after themselves. Ukraine sees Australia and the West only as a source of money and equipment for their political ideology.

Their Little Hitler leader swans around the world, begging and big-noting himself, while his country and people are being destroyed.