mhaze,

YOU misconstrue, you Paul1405 say Deeming is a Nazi sympathiser, No I did not say that, I said "Nazi associate" Why did YOU substitute the word "sympathiser" for the word "associate". As bad as misquoting.

As for equality, the claim by Jose' was; "Peter Dutton stands on a Liberal principle of equality for all". I gave my opinion that all Liberal governments, Menzies was the first, Morrison's was the last had not demonstrated "equality for all". I said all those Liberal governments had been just the opposite, rather discriminatory. As for the Labor Party there was no claim made that; "Anthony Albanese stands on a Labor principle of equality for all". Now if that was said, i may well offer an opinion, until then Labor is irrelevant to the argument.

Paul, while Moyra Deeming is suing for defamation, I will post your claim so she can include you in the action as she is on my Facebook. You might have to make a legal claim for that statement.

" Deeming is a Nazi sympathiser, No I did not say that, I said "Nazi associate" "

As distinction without a difference.

So if Deeming is a Nazi associate, is Albanese a crime syndicate associate?

"As for equality, the claim by Jose' was"

But then you introduced the attitudes to the White Australia policy for which you were blissfully unaware of the Labor attitude to that policy.

Re aboriginal improvement under Labor...."Silence came the stern reply. I'll take that as proof that you have no evidence and simply asserted as fact something you just wish was true."

mhaze

sympathiser; agree with a sentiment, opinion, or ideology.

associate; a partner or companion.

An associate does not necessarily AGREE, If I have a beer with you down at the pub, your shout of course, my company is worth it, I am associating with you, but not necessarily AGREEING with you.

The Labor Party is as relevant as the Greens, One Nation, the Big Clive Party, Shooters and Hooters Party etc to this argument.

Of course as a one eyed, rusted on, Liberal Party supporter you attempt to deflect from the real issue, which is Jose' claiming "Peter Dutton stands on a Liberal principle of equality for all". When I showed no such principle has existed in Liberal governments in the past.

No deflection mhaze, just agree or disagree with Jose' and his assertion, which I believe is a non existent principle. I would have agreed if Jose' has said; "Peter Dutton stands on a Liberal principle of racism against Aboriginals".

Oh good, we now agree that Deeming doesn't agree with the Nazis.

Now what about Albanese, does he agree with drug smuggling?

I'm not a Liberal supporter (rusted or otherwise). You can't seem to understand that failing to swoon over Labor isn't the same as agreeing with the Libs. I'm a rusted on liberal supporter but not a Liberal supporter. It seems to be a concept that eludes you.

I don't agree with Josephus' assertion. That wasn't my point. I was simply pointing out that your knee-jerk assertions about the White Australia policy were historically incomplete ie that for the first 60 or so years of the 20th century BOTH sides favoured the White Australia policy despite what your reflexive beliefs in ALP mythology might have told you.

Wrong again mhaze,

Either your comprehension is bad, or you are deliberately obtuse, you say "we (you and I) now agree that Deeming doesn't agree with the Nazis" I said; "associate does not necessarily AGREE" that indicates Deeming could agree, I don't know if she does or she doesn't, its a fact she associates with Nazi's.

"Now what about Albanese, does he agree with drug smuggling?" I'm not aware that Albanese agrees with drug smuggling or not, but that's not to say he doesn't. Has he ever made a statement on that subject, I can't recall one. And how does that impact on the so called Liberal Party principle of "equality for all", me thinks you are trying to divert the discussion away from an obvious incorrect assumption by Jose'.

"first 60 or so years of the 20th century BOTH sides favoured the White Australia policy" so they did. Since Jose' only referenced the Liberal Party as having a principle of equality for all, then if its not true, it doesn't make it true by deflecting to the Labor Party.

over to you.