josephus,
Like your previous claims that the voice would be able to veto legislation, these new claims don't stand up to even the most basic scrutiny. The voice will have no power to force Australians into anything.

Go to the NIAA site and read the Closing the Gap.
http://www.niaa.gov.au/indigenous-affairs/closing-gap
Quote:
"The Government has committed to work in partnership with Indigenous Australians, recognising that the only way to close the gap is when Indigenous Australians OWN, commit to and drive the outcomes sought, ALONGSIDE all governments.

The National Agreement pushes all parties to deliver on ambitious outcomes and a new way of working in PARTNERSHIP.

On 13 February 2023, the Albanese Government released its first Closing the Gap Implementation Plan (2023 Implementation Plan), led by the Prime Minister and the Minister for Indigenous Australians, the Hon Linda Burney MP. The Implementation Plan responds to the Commonwealth Closing the Gap Annual Report 2022, released on 30 November 2022, and outlines the Commonwealth’s strategic priorities and efforts to close the gap over the next 12 to 18 months."

Note it says. "Partnership with the Government,"

Here is the 10 year plan.

http://www.niaa.gov.au/ctg-actions
This means their race has self-determination by unelected / selected elite representatives in Government.

This means there are a selected few who have self-government powers alongside the Australian elected Government over a race of people within Australia and receive funding from Citizen taxpayers. That is why we are being continually told we are on aboriginal land. It is part of the adjustment program for aboriginal ownership of the land and self-determination by an elite group of aboriginals.

I have now read the above-mentioned article, the mains points of which are:-

. The Voice is wrong in principle and it would be disastrous in practice.

. The Prime Minister is trying to stampede us to vote “yes” based on the vibe.

. Albanese is frogmarching Australians into doing this – without a convention and without a debate.

The Voice is about "separatism", a polite word for apartheid.

In 2020, there were 3,273 registered aboriginal corporations delivering health and other services, and making representations to government. (IPA)

I see many persons are taken in by 'scams' each year in Australia.
That worries me.
It seems education is not teaching these persons to reason.
I see 'the voice' as a scam being perpetrated by interested parties.
Will voters be able to see it for what it is?

It is said a governments response would be 'voluntary', and the voice would have no 'force'.
But can you see a court saying: the people passed this law. There must be an implied 'proviso'; an expectation that a government must act on it?
I truly hope voters will wake up in time.