The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Exxon accurately predicted global warming from 1970s

Exxon accurately predicted global warming from 1970s

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. All
WTF?

Fester states: "In the early 70s I remember a book in the school library saying that by 2000 the world would be out of oil and running on nuclear."

Well Fester your unnamed book written by an unnamed author from the school library was wrong we clearly have not run out of oil.

Fester also states "Exxon Mobil treated the prediction appropriately."

If we extend Fester's logic forward then Fester is suggesting that it was appropriate for Exxonmobile to play down the fact that their predictions accurately predicted human-caused global warming.
Posted by WTF? - Not Again, Saturday, 14 January 2023 11:00:14 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
WTF?

ttbe states: "Look how Covid turned out to be a minor inconvenience despite the dire predictions of the Left."

This thread is not about either Covid or your left's predictions about Covid.

Stay on topic or start your own thread.
Posted by WTF? - Not Again, Saturday, 14 January 2023 11:08:45 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
WTF

Predictions are much easier when you go backwards. Clearly you have little experience in reading forecasts, like prospectuses for projects like Sun Cable and other projects, especially green projects. Always sound wonderful, but very often in VA a few years later.
Posted by Fester, Saturday, 14 January 2023 11:18:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi WTF,

Science is exciting because it's not absolute.
New discoveries are consistently being made.
New challenges keep cropping up - ways of thinking
changes. A large percentage of scientists seem to agree
on global warming, its causes, and what actions need to
be taken for the planet to survive.

Who knows what our future holds? Many people predict
nuclear as the answer - others - renewables, and so it goes.

We live and hopefully we learn - both from our mistakes,
and our science, and from predictions. Does money make the
world go round? Well you certainly need it to continue
innovating. Right?
Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 14 January 2023 11:21:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Here we go again !
The current warming period is the eighth known cycle.
This cycle started around 1800 +- a 100 years or so and is known as
the "Little Ice Age" or the Maunder Minimum.
It is believed to be close to peak about now or in the next 100 years or so.
The cycle is variable in length because it is composed of about five
natural cycles.
You may have heard of how the Vikings settled in Greenland around 1000ad
and then had to leave because agriculture became to hard as the cycle
started down towards the Little Ice Age.
Before all that there was the Roman Warming around 00 ad and the
minimum around 450ad.
It has all happened before but it is just a co-incidence that the
Industrial Revolution started during the Little Ice Age.
Maybe they started burning coal because it was so cold, hmmm.
Posted by Bazz, Saturday, 14 January 2023 11:52:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
WTF?

Fester says:" ...reading forecasts, like prospectuses for projects like Sun Cable and other projects, especially green projects."

The directors of Sun Cable are the ones who need to discuss this with their investors.

I'm not one of them so it has nothing to do with me.

This is just another deflection.

Foxy

I agree the future of energy supply and its consequences will be topical for the foreseeable future.

We can only hope that the huge amounts of money at stack don't cause critical scientific information to be hidden from the public by vested interests.
Posted by WTF? - Not Again, Saturday, 14 January 2023 11:54:37 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy