I say PtB, this is a bit rum auld chap:

"The Holy Romans have a huge number of sincere and honest members, but they have a few absolutely dishonest and totally corrupt members like Father Frank Brennan, and the Attorney General..."

I'd be on the watch for a law suit if you keep that tone up.

'Misguided', maybe.... 'wrong and muddled headed' perhaps... 'well- meaning' if you want to really patronise them both... 'Jesuit' if you really want to be rude...

A feature of any morally complete man, is his willingness to stand up for what he believes in, and an absense of fear. Lawsuits are but one of the tools used by people to intimidate and subjugate, other individuals.

We should have nothing to fear from a lawsuit, if we hold our views honestly, and there was still a venue in which our views could be debated, with a fair and public hearing by a competent independent and impartial tribunal established by law. The Criminal Code Act 1995 defines dishonesty, in S 130.3 and S 130.4 reserves the question of honesty for the trier of fact. That means that if a person is accused of being dishonest, he or she is entitled to expect that a jury will determine whether he or she is a liar.

The passage quoted above, is lifted verbatim from the Covenant’s Article 14. It also states that all persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. Currently serious criminals get juries as of right, civil and minor offenders don’t. Even criminals are sorted into two classes. The first class are those whose crimes are so minimal, that they are not given jury trials as of right, but must submit to a local priest appointed by the State called a Magistrate. Really serious criminals, get a jury trial as of right, but in reality only get a half a dose of justice, because the State Priest steps in then after conviction and imposes the penalty.

This offends the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights because under Christian Law, both sentencing and guilt were the prerogative of a jury. This is represented by S 14 of the Magna Carta, an Act that was still in force in Australia in 1900, when the Judicature was enacted into the Constitution. A copy may be found here.
http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=466

When the true believers become truly believers, then the moral and ethical code represented by the Covenant, which virtually codifies the New Testament of the Holy Bible will be recognized, accepted and enforced, and freedom will reign supreme