There always were vamps who preyed upon anything in trousers and with a frivolous disregard for the probable partnered status of their targets. The vamps are in the workplace, in the community, at pubs and sure they they 'dog' men with status and especially celebrities - where their ruthless, immoral pursuits inevitably attract public attention.

Feminists in their ivory towers have demonstrated how completely out of touch they are by painting such exploitative women as 'victims'. Very few woman could ever agree with that!

In the subject case, crucial aspects of the alleged victim's claims have been dispelled by the accounts of independent witnesses. For example it wasn't possible for men to have climbed in through the very small window as she claimed.

Would the John's case have been screened by the ABC at all if it didn't involve a successful, white, heterosexual man? Most likely not and that says something about the claimed independence of the ABC, especially given that the story was so poorly researched in the breathless haste to bring it to air.

Yabby,
Fancy that! Researches reckon a penis works the same way as a windmill pump. i.e. brings fluids to the surface. next time I have to service the mill, I'll look at it working and smile.

Fractelle,
Never again will I be able to help the missus get the meat ready for freezing by packing in bags and extracting the air.

Banjo

I'll never think of "servicing the mill" in quite the same way either. Now when you tell your missus that you're checking on the mill - just what will she think?

I don't always agree with you, but love to have a laugh and I'm glad you caught the humour on this one.

Cheers

*If you take the simplistic Yabby-evolutionary-biology-is-destiny POV from this, then what have we been pairing off for?*

Clearly the topic is well over your head Fractelle, my claim btw has
always been that biology has a huge role in destiny and its not
simplistic at all, but quite complex. Perhaps just too complicated
for you :)

You are pairing off for good reasons. Human babies need lots of
resources, as do the babies of other species which pair bond.
A female 10'000 years ago, without a mate and kids to feed, would
easily have starved to death. Thats 500 grandmothers back, in
evolutionary terms a mere blip.

*Yet according to Basic Plumbing 101, that's how men have evolved to, er, well if you've read the article, you know.*

Nope, it means that if you screwed the milkman, women do, there is
still plenty of time for your partners sperm to compete, when he
gets home. Women do screw around without being in gangbangs, its
common.

*Even the thought of two men at once is scary.*

To you perhaps. Clearly not to the footie chick in the Sunday Times,
who claims to have screwed over 200 players, sometimes a dozen at
a time.

Women have traded sex for resources for as long as we know. That
means lots of sperm competing. Any evolutionary trait that would
have an advantage, would evolve and become dominant.

Fractelle,
Wonders will never cease, that is now twice that we agree on something. I agreed with your comments about our culture on the other thread and now the article you gave the link to. I do not see how anyone could not see it as funny. Amazing what some Unis research and what jobs some people have. Am still laughing.

In regards to this topic, I agree with yabby. Saw a show on SBS awhile back called 'footy chicks'. If it comes back it is worth a watch to be informed about how some young women throw themselves at topline football players of all codes. They deliberately frequent the pubs, etc. where the players go and compete with each other for attention and not just for socializing either.

"The Blue Cross:"'The Jew-dishery'"

Ginx:"The Blue Cross:

Nice one!!"

Oh dear, Gunky...
Posted by Antiseptic, Monday, 25 May 2009 2:18:57 PM"

You KNEW exactly what I was endorsing..., or did you?

You going to distort this thread, with more pettiness, odious blow-fly?