The Forum > Article Comments > War: not in my name > Comments
War: not in my name : Comments
By Kellie Tranter, published 18/12/2008Open letter to Stephen Smith: All Australians deserve to know the true picture in Iraq and Afghanistan.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
Posted by runner, Thursday, 18 December 2008 4:19:48 PM
| |
from
http://toarchive.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html >>CLAIM..no transitional's...systematic,gaps/..fossil record. Response:...direct_lineages are_not required!;<<{LOL}>>they could not be verified even if found.<<[LOL}>>What a transitional[fossil]is[in keeping with what the theory of evolution,predicts;is a fossil that shows a mosaic of features from an older and more recent organism<<lol;this redefition of the question is a evolution constant# >>.....We do not expect to find finely detailed sequences of fossils lasting for millions of years..we do find several'fine'gradations of fossils between species and genera,<< YET FAIL TO NAME THEM[no link provided{IE the ONLY proof is within the genus[like wolf/dog][micro-evolution[WITHIN THE SPECIES;[not evolution INTO new genus] >>..many other sequences between higher taxa..very well filled out<<but again not named[how very'scientific'. >>the following are fossil transitions between species and genera/:'Human ancestry...many fossils of human,ancestors,'<< [NONE OF THEM REVEALED[,not even a link]>>'and the differences between species are so gradual..not always clear where to draw the lines between them.'<<{LOL}but note the other[7]'proofs' >>The horns of titanotheres[progressively larger sizes,from nothing to prominence]<<are babies born with horns?[is THIS'nothing'AMBIOGENESIS?] >>A gradual transitional-fossil sequence<<[UNAMED}>>..Several intermediate morphospecies connect the two species<<[you would think that a word like moerpho-species would ring bells[or at least deserve a link?/to be NAMED?] >>The fossi..transitions between species of Phacops ..Planktonic forminifera...punctuated gradualism.>> no kidding fossils preserve delicate plankton but not'delicate'animals[LOL}['punctuated gradulism[=]evolutional LAW?[but the'proof'goes on>>Fossils of[mollusc]species/Cenozoic marine ostracodes/The Eocene primate genus Cantius/callops of the genus Chesapecten[gradual change in one"ear"of their hinge over about 13 million years.The ribs also change/Gryphaea(coiled oysters)become larger and broader but thinner and flatter..<<BUT REMAIN OYSTERS >>The following are fossil transitionals between families,orders,and classes:3rd link[Transitions between fish and tetrapods]GOES to http://toarchive.org/indexcc/CC/CC212.html# >>ClaimCC212;..no transitional fossils between fish/tetrapods[Response:There are several[?}<< several?[good transitional fossils]:the rest are bad?[the PROOF?] >>Most fish have anterior and posterior external nostrils..A fossil shows eight bony fingers..offering'evidence'that fingers developed before land-going tetrapods.<< BUT THEN DISAPPEARED till apes RE-EVOLVED IT?[what they devolved after they'evolved;[onto land?]but back to your'PROOF' >>A,Devonian/humerus#[JOKE HA-HA?}..could push itself up with its forelimbs but could not move it limbs back and forth to walk/Acanthostega,a Devonian fossil,..a fish./Ichthyostega,..'probably'amphibious.../Tulerpeton,.Its shoulders..>>where is the shoulderblade evolving[NEEDED to bear the weight limbs MUST support?]yet,another'link' http://home.entouch.net/dmd/transit.htm no_proof[on my[10th]link] [your lying to your own_kids] Posted by one under god, Thursday, 18 December 2008 5:15:58 PM
| |
opps [SORRY about previous post [i was using any form to meet the 350 word limit, accidentially posted a response to a topic asking people to EXPLAIN evolution]
i wont put up the link[this was a mistake] sorry [but its a real battle out there] with people with closed minds[strangly much like the cl;osed [madeup minds that make these wars] again appoligies for posting in the wrong placxe i will try to post [at the right site] as my hour must be up now anyhow im for no war in my name too im not fighting the other battle [only exposing [rebutting the facts[but im not a diplo-mat] but do know when i done wrong; so 'apollo-guise' yet again back to the war[but not in my name] cheers Posted by one under god, Thursday, 18 December 2008 5:24:13 PM
| |
my goodness "one under god" If brains were electricty you wouldn't light a LED. I bet you are really good looking too.
Posted by Jayb, Thursday, 18 December 2008 6:03:55 PM
| |
How pathetic, unimaginative, and narrow minded is this political analysis about the war in Iraq and war in general. Attorney Tranter is using “accounting” methods, since she lacks imagination, and indeed, “creative accounting” as she is increasing the number of civilian casualties in Iraq by four to one to make her case of ‘War: not in my name’. She is blind to the fact that the attack on 9/11 was a dress rehearsal of what the Islamist fanatics had in store for Western civilization.
With the leaps and bounds of technology and the ever becoming easy way for one to obtain the knowledge to this technology, the terrorists have a great potential in the near future to acquire weapons of mass destruction and indeed nuclear ones that they would use relentlessly against civilians in the West whose casualties would dwarf even her creative accounting figures of civilian casualties in Iraq. In her typical mechanistic thinking as a trained lawyer, she cannot see that both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars were and are PREVENTIVE wars whose goal is to abort the coupling of rogue Islamist states with the holy warriors of Islam that would threaten the foundations of all modern civilized life. I would suggest to her that she sticks to her vocation as an attorney and not delve in the intricate matters of war and peace in which it’s obvious she is completely incompetent and effete. http://kotzabasis3.wordpress.com Posted by Themistocles, Thursday, 18 December 2008 6:31:38 PM
| |
It's a pity this girl is such a good typist. If she weren't so good, just may be her brain would be able to keep up with her fingers.
Perhaps then she msy be able to produce something reasonable well thought out. Posted by Hasbeen, Friday, 19 December 2008 1:13:43 AM
|
'This month in Afghanistan, men on motorcycles threw acid on a group of girls who dared to attend school. One of the girls, a 17-year-old named Shamsia, told reporters from her hospital bed: “I will go to my school even if they kill me. My message for the enemies is that if they do this 100 times, I am still going to continue my studies.”