The Forum > Article Comments > Incensed about censorship > Comments
Incensed about censorship : Comments
By Melinda Tankard Reist, published 5/12/2008How many mistakes have the Classification Board made with porn magazines over the years? Someone needs to audit the Board.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
Posted by runner, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 12:11:42 PM
| |
runner, lust is a natural biological process that is the cause of why people procreate.
Posted by Steel, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 3:20:55 PM
| |
I see yet another child porn bust including a former Victorian QC.
'Child protection operations teams seized more than 15,000 videos and 500,000 images of child abuse which were shared between members of a peer-to-peer network. The images and video included the sexual abuse of children as young as 12 months old.' http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24784454-661,00.html With so many sick judges, artists and priests it is no wonder we have trouble having any sort of child protection in place. It makes me wonder how many of the champions of porn on OLO are into this sick material. As I have said many times enjoy your bit of perversion and don't worry about the innocent children being abused. These same idiots who support porn are likely to oppose a child getting smacked for disobedience. NO wonder our children are not safe. Posted by runner, Thursday, 11 December 2008 11:44:21 AM
| |
"It makes me wonder how many of the champions of porn on OLO are into this sick material." Posted by runner, Thursday, 11 December 2008 11:44:21 AM
I'm hoping that post gets left up. A low even for runner. Will David (Boaz) see fit to chastise his fellow believer for his enthusiastic phrasing or will it be treated as acceptable behaviour for one who cliams to follow christ. Is the comment in keeping with the teaching of christ and the example of the early church as David commented on elsewhere? If nothing else leaving the post up serves as a reminder to all of what kind of person runner is. R0bert Posted by R0bert, Thursday, 11 December 2008 7:28:05 PM
| |
Whats wrong with it RObert?
I would say that all of the champions of porn on OLO were into this sick material. Why would they champion it, if they werent engaged in 'flesh activity' with pictures of naked men and women? I think you just like to chase the christians here on OLO RObert:) Posted by Gibo, Thursday, 11 December 2008 7:56:15 PM
| |
Gibo just before I add you to the list to ask David about.
Are you supporting runners vile suggestion that those who are opposed to censorship of erotic material featuring adults are into child pornography? Your wording is even stronger than runners but it's possible that you have not understood what runner is alleging. Are you accusing those on OLO who take a different view to yourself to adult porn of being users of child porn? R0bert Posted by R0bert, Thursday, 11 December 2008 8:09:04 PM
|
'That’s why I wished that Churches used their donations more wisely, i.e. to purchase (on-line) porn or hire prostitutes whenever priests have ‘the urge’. Because they expect celibacy or can’t express themselves sexually, because they’re deprived of something that is innate, natural and healthy, they end up frustrated monsters.'
You obviously choose not to accept the simple fact that lust leads to more lust. That is why the perverts who use porn have to have something more perverted or bizzare material than before. It would be interesting to find out how many suicide full of guilt and filth after realising that no amount of this crap can satisfy the inner longing of man's soul.To the Catholic churches credit ( of whom I am no fan) they are trying now not to recruit homosexuals to become priests. This will cut down drastically the rate of paedophille in the catholic church. These 'frustrated monsters' are actually bound by their own lust and no doubt often feed on porn and perversion. You seem to either be in denial or have things back the front.