The Forum > Article Comments > Incensed about censorship > Comments
Incensed about censorship : Comments
By Melinda Tankard Reist, published 5/12/2008How many mistakes have the Classification Board made with porn magazines over the years? Someone needs to audit the Board.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
-
- All
Gibo, seriously, RObert just asks questions about some things that some Christians say.
In another thread recently, I mentioned that the Christians on OLO (apart from one or two, occasionally) mostly let each other get away with claiming anything (related to Christianity) and never question each other.
I didn’t think I was ‘hunting’ anyone and I think that RObert is saying something similar. There’s nothing wrong with asking questions about ludicrous statements.
That Runner implies that the posters on OLO who reject the idea of compulsory filters are into child porn says more about his warped mind than about any porn lovers’ minds.
I happen to find porn quite boring to watch and don’t waste time on it, but I wouldn’t judge anyone who enjoys it, let alone dump a compulsory filter in their pc.
I’m so over fundamentalists who continuously tell others how to behave, what to wear, who they can or can’t marry or have sex with or in this case, what they can or cannot watch.
Runner, yes I would agree that addiction to anything is a problem including addiction to porn but not everyone who enjoys porn is addicted. Many watch it occasionally. Much like enjoying a glass of wine or smoking a joint occasionally doesn’t mean one is addicted.
Gibo brings up ONE reasonable argument to think about though- how would we know whether a porn star is really at the legal age?
I hope that there is adequate control on the age of the models/porn stars.
Also, some countries consider 18 the legal age and some countries 16, so when someone watches porn from overseas it might be illegal to watch it in Australia if the girls in the flick are 16.