The Forum > Article Comments > Is the Navy talking up China's nuclear submarine threat? > Comments
Is the Navy talking up China's nuclear submarine threat? : Comments
By Marko Beljac, published 12/9/2008Should the Australian Defence Force be structured and sized for going to war against China as an appendage of US Pacific Command?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
Is that a callsign btw?
DMO has only been up and about since 2000. My understanding is that the Sea Sprite project was not DMO initiated or managed nor was the Collins class. The acquisitions process has improved significantly over its predecessor, although there are still problems.
I wonder how it is you believe that the AWACs and Tankers don’t help with the maritime strike capability that you refer to?
And I would have though that the MRH-90 and the Tiger were both no brainers, vital as they are to modern battlefield mobility, surveillance and force protection.
The Collins class, whilst it cost way too much, is now a potent capability and the lack of crews which is limiting its effectiveness should be immediately redressed.