Keith:

You asked me what I thought of "Col babie"s comments: As I have said before, I seriously think that he is a tad unstable, - NO, make that very unstable!

To cut to the chase: he is a tacky, whacky, (Father forgive him for he knows not what he does, ot thinks!) sad sack of introverted crap!

He has exhibited by his rantings that he is well past his use-by date, and should be treated the same way,...thrown out on the rubbish tip!

He indicates, by reading between the lines of his ravings, that he is indeed desperately seeking some form of love or attention to assuage his obvious crazed desire for drop-kicks like Maggie or Sarah!...maybe he was rejected by his Mummy and had to spend lots of time sitting in the corner sucking his thumb and then as he grew older he obviously developed another naughty habit that sent him partially blind and VERY one-eyed!

He is definitely NOT going to change his attitude towards posters on these threads, because he believes he is so right, and will, like a woman spurned, insist on having the very last word ( until the final moments in his Bunker!)

Yad-da-da, Yad-da-da, Yad-da-da!

Thanks for that, Rainier. I've wondered from time to time what Col looks like - in my mind's eye I had him as a kind of cross between Alf Garnett and Victor Meldrew, but I think your picture is probably far more accurate.

Cuphandle” You asked me what I thought of "Col babie"s comments:”

Actually keith asked you what you thought of my “opinions”,

which, will challenge you because it requires you to interpret my comments for the intent behind them to distill my “opinion” on anything.

So keith, you have set the bar too high.

When it comes to rising to an occasion and commenting on someones “opinion”,

cuphandle is better off limbo dancing.

But the underlying reality of cuphandles response is, in her opinion, I should not be allowed to express mine.

Pure and simple, because I dare challenge the machinations of her stagnant mind I am going to be up for anything she can manage to string together.

Not that it bothers me in the least.

CJ I have nothing to help me understands what you may look like.

But it is understandable from reflecting on the sum of your posts

You are completely vacuous,

devoid of any substance and therefore,

completely incapable of reflecting light, necessary to produce any image.

<<I've wondered from time to time what Col looks like - in my mind's eye I had him as a kind of cross between Alf Garnett and Victor Meldrew>>

I always picture him as stocky and bald, with a thick mo, and perpetually angry. I think it's because his descriptions of the way he deals with his children put me in mind of that Austrian bloke who had his kids in the cellar.

The Rouge:

This self-styled God`s gift to the world of literacy has the audacity to criticize other contributors offerings!....just have a look at the mess he makes of his latest stumblings and bumblings in his frantic rush to have the final say in a lost argument, and he says it is hard to make mistakes in composition?.....I rest my case your Honour!

Suggest that you go to bed Dorrie and sleep on it,...but wear boxing gloves, whilst you dream of your beloved Maggie and Sarah!

Confucius say "Man who go to sleep with problem on mind, sure to wake up with solution in hand!"

Col

Wakey wakey - hands off snakey - eggs and bakey.

Oink oink!